Title 22 › Chapter 94— IRAN THREAT REDUCTION AND SYRIA HUMAN RIGHTS › Subchapter V— MISCELLANEOUS › § 8772
Allows certain financial assets held in the United States by a foreign securities intermediary to be used to satisfy judgments against Iran. If the U.S. asset is blocked (or would be if located in the U.S.) and equals in value an Iranian asset held abroad (including assets of Iran’s central bank or other agencies), a court can order it turned over for judgments against Iran. The rule overrides conflicting state laws and can apply even if sovereign immunity would normally block recovery. Before turning over any asset, the court must decide whether Iran really has the beneficial ownership and that no one else has a constitutionally protected property interest under the Fifth Amendment. The court must consider claims by anyone other than Iran, but it does not treat a foreign intermediary’s normal custodial holding as ownership. Applies only to the assets listed in two Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran cases: Case No. 10 Civ. 4518 (BSJ) (GWG) — assets restrained and subject to court orders dated June 27, 2008, and extended June 23, 2009; May 10, 2010; and June 11, 2010 while they remain restrained — and Case No. 13 Civ. 9195 (LAP). Definitions: “blocked asset” = assets seized or frozen under specified U.S. laws, with limited exclusions; “financial asset” and “securities intermediary” = terms from the Uniform Commercial Code (financial asset includes cash); “Iran” = the Iranian government, its central bank, and agencies; “person”/“entity” = individual or organization; “terrorist party” and “United States” are as defined in the cited laws.
Full Legal Text
Foreign Relations and Intercourse — Source: USLM XML via OLRC
Legislative History
Reference
Citation
22 U.S.C. § 8772
Title 22 — Foreign Relations and Intercourse
Last Updated
Apr 5, 2026
Release point: 119-73not60