§7292 — Title 38 Veterans' Benefits | U.S. Code

Summary

After the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims decides a case, any party can ask the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review legal questions the Veterans court used in its decision. To start that review, the party must file a notice of appeal with the Veterans Claims court within the same time and in the same way as appeals from U.S. district courts to U.S. courts of appeals. You cannot ask for review of a refusal to reopen the schedule of disability ratings under 38 U.S.C. 1155, and pure factual findings are not open for review. If a judge or panel in the Veterans Claims court finds a controlling legal question where reasonable people can disagree and that immediate review would help end the case, the judge must tell the chief judge. The chief judge can certify the question, and then any party may ask the Federal Circuit to decide it by filing a petition within 10 days after certification. The Federal Circuit has the only power to review challenges to statutes, regulations, or their interpretations and to interpret constitutional or statutory provisions as needed. It must decide legal questions and can set aside a relied-on regulation or interpretation if it is arbitrary or capricious, violates the Constitution, exceeds legal authority, or did not follow required procedures. The Federal Circuit may not review factual findings or how a law applies to the facts of a case, except for constitutional issues. The court can affirm, change, reverse, or send the case back. Its judgment is final unless the Supreme Court reviews it by certiorari under 28 U.S.C. 1254, and review procedures follow the Supreme Court’s rules under 28 U.S.C. 2072.

Title 38, §7292

Veterans' Benefits — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)After a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims is entered in a case, any party to the case may obtain a review of the decision with respect to the validity of a decision of the Court on a rule of law or of any statute or regulation (other than a refusal to review the schedule of ratings for disabilities adopted under section 1155 of this title) or any interpretation thereof (other than a determination as to a factual matter) that was relied on by the Court in making the decision. Such a review shall be obtained by filing a notice of appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims within the time and in the manner prescribed for appeal to United States courts of appeals from United States district courts.

(b)(1)When a judge or panel of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, in making an order not otherwise appealable under this section, determines that a controlling question of law is involved with respect to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion and that there is in fact a disagreement between the appellant and the Secretary with respect to that question of law and that the ultimate termination of the case may be materially advanced by the immediate consideration of that question, the judge or panel shall notify the chief judge of that determination. Upon receiving such a notification, the chief judge shall certify that such a question is presented, and any party to the case may then petition the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to decide the question. That court may permit an interlocutory appeal to be taken on that question if such a petition is filed with it within 10 days after the certification by the chief judge of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Neither the application for, nor the granting of, an appeal under this paragraph shall stay proceedings in the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, unless a stay is ordered by a judge of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims or by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

(2)For purposes of subsections (d) and (e) of this section, an order described in this paragraph shall be treated as a decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

(c)The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction to review and decide any challenge to the validity of any statute or regulation or any interpretation thereof brought under this section, and to interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, to the extent presented and necessary to a decision. The judgment of such court shall be final subject to review by the Supreme Court upon certiorari, in the manner provided in section 1254 of title 28.

(d)(1)The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall decide all relevant questions of law, including interpreting constitutional and statutory provisions. The court shall hold unlawful and set aside any regulation or any interpretation thereof (other than a determination as to a factual matter) that was relied upon in the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit finds to be—

(A)arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law;

(B)contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity;

(C)in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or in violation of a statutory right; or

(D)without observance of procedure required by law.

(2)Except to the extent that an appeal under this chapter presents a constitutional issue, the Court of Appeals may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case.

(e)(1)Upon such review, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall have power to affirm or, if the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims is not in accordance with law, to modify or reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims or to remand the matter, as appropriate.

(2)Rules for review of decisions of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims shall be those prescribed by the Supreme Court under section 2072 of title 28.

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

Amendments

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–330 inserted “a decision of the Court on a rule of law or of” after “the validity of” in first sentence. 1998—Subsecs. (a), (b), (d)(1), (e). Pub. L. 105–368 substituted “Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims” for “Court of Veterans Appeals” wherever appearing. 1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4092 of this title as this section. Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–83, § 5(c)(1), substituted “1155” for “355”. Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 102–83, § 4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted “Secretary” for “Administrator”. Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–54 amended subsec. (c) as in effect immediately before the enactment of Pub. L. 102–40 by substituting “United States Court” for “United States Courts”. 1989—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 101–94 struck out “statute or” before “regulation”.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

of 2002 Amendment Pub. L. 107–330, title IV, § 402(b), Dec. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 2832, provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply with respect to any appeal— “(1) filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 6, 2002]; or “(2) pending with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit as of the date of the enactment of this Act in which a decision has not been rendered as of that date.”

Effective Date

of 1998 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 105–368 effective on first day of first month beginning more than 90 days after Nov. 11, 1998, see section 513 of Pub. L. 105–368, set out as a note under section 7251 of this title.

Effective Date

of 1989 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 101–94 effective as if included in Pub. L. 100–687, div. A, see section 302(c) of Pub. L. 101–94, set out as a note under section 5701 of this title.

§7292 Review by United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Summary

Title 38, §7292

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

Amendments

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

Effective Date

Effective Date

Citations & Metadata