42 U.S.C. § 18743: Critical minerals mining…

Summary

Creates programs to fund research and pilot projects to make the U.S. supply of critical minerals and metals stronger and less dependent on risky foreign sources. The Secretary, working with the Director of the National Science Foundation, must give competitive research awards to colleges, National Laboratories, nonprofits, or consortia (including those that work with industry). Funded projects can cover new mining and mapping methods, cleaner processing and recycling, better end-to-end design from mine to device to recycling, long-term study of reclaimed mine sites, use of AI and machine learning for exploration and sorting, isotope and geology studies, and student training. A federal Critical Minerals Subcommittee must coordinate science and technology work across agencies, advise on research and workforce needs, encourage recycling and trade with allies, improve mapping and data, make a strategic plan, report to Congress, and identify rules that limit mining. Key defined terms (one line each): critical mineral — term defined elsewhere in law; critical minerals and metals — includes host minerals; Director — head of the National Science Foundation; Foundation — National Science Foundation; end-to-end — covers the whole mineral life cycle from mining to disposal or recycling; foreign entity of concern — foreign groups or firms flagged for terrorism, sanctions, espionage, or actions harmful to U.S. security; National Laboratory — defined elsewhere; recycling — reusing materials from spent products; secondary recovery — getting minerals from discarded products or mining waste. The Secretary must also run a grant program for U.S. pilot projects to process, recycle, or develop critical minerals and metals. No single grant may be over $10,000,000. The Secretary must favor projects likely to be economically viable, award at least 30 percent of funds each year to secondary recovery projects, prefer domestic processing, and ensure no grant sends minerals to a foreign entity of concern for processing. Congress authorized $100,000,000 for each fiscal year 2021 through 2024 for this grant program.

Title 42, §18743

The Public Health and Welfare, Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)Definitions

In this section: (1) Critical mineral

(2)Critical minerals and metals

The term “critical minerals and metals” includes any host mineral of a critical mineral.

(3)Director (4) End-to-end

The term “Director” means the Director of the Foundation.

(5)Foreign entity of concern

The term “foreign entity of concern” means a foreign entity that is—

(A)designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the Secretary of State under section 1189(a) of title 8;

(B)included on the list of specially designated nationals and blocked persons maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury (commonly known as the SDN list);

(C)owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of a government of a foreign country that is a covered nation (as defined in section 2533c(d) of title 10);

(D)alleged by the Attorney General to have been involved in activities for which a conviction was obtained under—

(i)chapter 37 of title 18 (commonly known as the “Espionage Act”);

(ii)section 951 or 1030 of title 18;

(iii)chapter 90 of title 18 (commonly known as the “Economic Espionage Act of 1996)”;

(iv)the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.);

(v)section 224, 225, 226, 227, or 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2274, 2275, 2276, 2277, and 2284);

(vi)the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.); or

(vii)the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); or

(E)determined by the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, to be engaged in unauthorized conduct that is detrimental to the national security or foreign policy of the United States.

(6)Foundation

The term “Foundation” means the National Science Foundation.

(7)Institution of higher education

The term “institution of higher education” has the meaning given the term in section 1001 of title 20.

(8)National Laboratory

The term “National Laboratory” has the meaning given the term in section 15801 of this title.

(9)Recycling

The term “recycling” means the process of collecting and processing spent materials and devices and turning the materials and devices into raw materials or components that can be reused either partially or completely.

(10)Secondary recovery

The term “secondary recovery” means the recovery of critical minerals and metals from discarded end-use products or from waste products produced during the metal refining and manufacturing process, including from mine waste piles, acid mine drainage sludge, or byproducts produced through legacy mining and metallurgy activities.

(b)Critical minerals mining and recycling research and development

(1)In general

In order to support supply chain resiliency, the Secretary, in coordination with the Director, shall issue awards, on a competitive basis, to eligible entities described in paragraph (2) to support basic research that will accelerate innovation to advance critical minerals mining, recycling, and reclamation strategies and technologies for the purposes of— (A)

(B)eliminating national reliance on minerals and mineral materials that are subject to supply disruptions.

(2)Eligible entities

Entities eligible to receive an award under paragraph (1) are the following:

(A)Institutions of higher education.

(B)National Laboratories.

(C)Nonprofit organizations.

(D)Consortia of entities described in subparagraphs (A) through (C), including consortia that collaborate with private industry.

(3)Use of funds

Activities funded by an award under this section may include—

(A)advancing mining research and development activities to develop new mapping and mining technologies and techniques, including advanced critical mineral extraction and production—

(i)to improve existing, or to develop new, supply chains of critical minerals; and

(ii)to yield more efficient, economical, and environmentally benign mining practices;

(B)advancing critical mineral processing research activities to improve separation, alloying, manufacturing, or recycling techniques and technologies that can decrease the energy intensity, waste, potential environmental impact, and costs of those activities;

(C)advancing research and development of critical minerals mining and recycling technologies that take into account the potential end-uses and disposal of critical minerals, in order to improve end-to-end integration of mining and technological applications;

(D)conducting long-term earth observation of reclaimed mine sites, including the study of the evolution of microbial diversity at those sites;

(E)examining the application of artificial intelligence for geological exploration of critical minerals, including what size and diversity of data sets would be required;

(F)examining the application of machine learning for detection and sorting of critical minerals, including what size and diversity of data sets would be required;

(G)conducting detailed isotope studies of critical minerals and the development of more refined geologic models; or

(H)providing training and research opportunities to undergraduate and graduate students to prepare the next generation of mining engineers and researchers.

(c)Critical minerals interagency subcommittee

(1)In general

In order to support supply chain resiliency, the Critical Minerals Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Council (referred to in this subsection as the “Subcommittee”) shall coordinate Federal science and technology efforts to ensure secure and reliable supplies of critical minerals to the United States.

(2)Purposes

The purposes of the Subcommittee shall be—

(A)to advise and assist the National Science and Technology Council, including the Committee on Homeland and National Security of the National Science and Technology Council, on United States policies, procedures, and plans relating to critical minerals, including—

(i)Federal research, development, and deployment efforts to optimize methods for extractions, concentration, separation, and purification of conventional, secondary, and unconventional sources of critical minerals, including research that prioritizes end-to-end integration of mining and recycling techniques and the end-use target for critical minerals;

(ii)efficient use and reuse of critical minerals, including recycling technologies for critical minerals and the reclamation of critical minerals from components, such as spent batteries;

(iii)addressing the technology transitions between research or lab-scale mining and recycling and commercialization of these technologies;

(iv)the critical minerals workforce of the United States; and

(v)United States private industry investments in innovation and technology transfer from federally funded science and technology;

(B)to identify emerging opportunities, stimulate international cooperation, and foster the development of secure and reliable supply chains of critical minerals, including activities relating to the reuse of critical minerals via recycling;

(C)to ensure the transparency of information and data related to critical minerals; and

(D)to provide recommendations on coordination and collaboration among the research, development, and deployment programs and activities of Federal agencies to promote a secure and reliable supply of critical minerals necessary to maintain national security, economic well-being, and industrial production.

(3)Responsibilities

In carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2), the Subcommittee may, taking into account the findings and recommendations of relevant advisory committees—

(A)provide recommendations on how Federal agencies may improve the topographic, geologic, and geophysical mapping of the United States and improve the discoverability, accessibility, and usability of the resulting and existing data, to the extent permitted by law and subject to appropriate limitation for purposes of privacy and security;

(B)assess the progress toward developing critical minerals recycling and reprocessing technologies;

(C)assess the end-to-end lifecycle of critical minerals, including for mining, usage, recycling, and end-use material and technology requirements;

(D)examine, and provide recommendations for, options for accessing and developing critical minerals through investment and trade with allies and partners of the United States;

(E)evaluate and provide recommendations to incentivize the development and use of advances in science and technology in the private industry;

(F)assess the need for, and make recommendations to address, the challenges the United States critical minerals supply chain workforce faces, including—

(i)aging and retiring personnel and faculty;

(ii)public perceptions about the nature of mining and mineral processing; and

(iii)foreign competition for United States talent;

(G)develop, and update as necessary, a strategic plan to guide Federal programs and activities to enhance—

(i)scientific and technical capabilities across critical mineral supply chains, including a roadmap that identifies key research and development needs and coordinates ongoing activities for source diversification, more efficient use, recycling, and substitution for critical minerals; and

(ii)cross-cutting mining science, data science techniques, materials science, manufacturing science and engineering, computational modeling, and environmental health and safety research and development; and

(H)report to the appropriate committees of Congress on activities and findings under this subsection.

(4)Mandatory responsibilities

In carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2), the Subcommittee shall, taking into account the findings and recommendations of relevant advisory committees, identify and evaluate Federal policies and regulations that restrict the mining of critical minerals.

(d)Grant program for processing of critical minerals and development of critical minerals and metals

(1)Establishment

The Secretary, in consultation with the Director, the Secretary of the Interior, and the Secretary of Commerce, shall establish a grant program to finance pilot projects for— (A)

(B)the development of critical minerals and metals in the United States

(2)Limitation on grant awards

A grant awarded under paragraph (1) may not exceed $10,000,000.

(3)Economic viability

In awarding grants under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give priority to projects that the Secretary determines are likely to be economically viable over the long term.

(4)Secondary recovery

In awarding grants under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall seek to award not less than 30 percent of the total amount of grants awarded during the fiscal year for projects relating to secondary recovery of critical minerals and metals.

(5)Domestic priority

In awarding grants for the development of critical minerals and metals under paragraph (1)(B), the Secretary shall prioritize pilot projects that will process the critical minerals and metals domestically.

(6)Prohibition on processing by foreign entity of concern

In awarding grants under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall ensure that pilot projects do not export for processing any critical minerals and metals to a foreign entity of concern.

(7)Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out the grant program established under paragraph (1) $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024.

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

section 2533c(d) of title 10, referred to subsec. (a)(5)(C), was renumbered section 4872(d) of title 10 by Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1870(d)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4286, as amended by Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, § 1701(t)(2)(B), (C), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2150. The Arms Export Control Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(5)(D)(iv), is Pub. L. 90–629, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1320, which is classified principally to chapter 39 (§ 2751 et seq.) of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see

Short Title

note set out under section 2751 of Title 22 and Tables. The Export Control Reform Act of 2018, referred to in subsec. (a)(5)(D)(vi), is subtitle B (§§ 1741–1781) of title XVII of div. A of Pub. L. 115–232, Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2208, which is classified principally to chapter 58 (§ 4801 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see

Short Title

note set out under section 4801 of Title 50 and Tables. The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(5)(D)(vii), is title II of Pub. L. 95–223, Dec. 28, 1977, 91 Stat. 1626, which is classified generally to chapter 35 (§ 1701 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see

Short Title

note set out under section 1701 of Title 50 and Tables.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Wage Rate RequirementsFor provisions relating to rates of wages to be paid to laborers and mechanics on projects for

Construction

, alteration, or repair work funded under div. D or an amendment by div. D of Pub. L. 117–58, including authority of Secretary of Labor, see section 18851 of this title.

§18743 Critical Minerals Mining and Recycling Research

Summary

Title 42, §18743

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

Short Title

Short Title

Short Title

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Construction

Citations & Metadata