PRIA, Government Policy, Made Personal

Summary

Groups of two or more common carriers may not take joint actions that hurt fair dealing or block others from doing business. They cannot join in a boycott or refuse to work with someone in an unreasonable way. They must not together limit the use of intermodal services or new technology. They may not use predatory tactics to push out or keep out other carriers, including carriers that are not in the group, ocean tramps, or bulk carriers. They cannot bargain with non-ocean carriers about rates or services for ocean carriers in the United States unless those talks and any agreements do not break antitrust laws and fit the goals of this part; however, they may set and publish a joint through rate. The same antitrust rule applies to negotiating for certain covered services, and they may not negotiate with tug or towing providers about U.S. rates or services. They must not deny or cut to below a reasonable amount the pay owed to an ocean freight forwarder in U.S. export trade. They cannot split up shippers among group carriers or stop a carrier from seeking cargo from a shipper, except as allowed by section 40303(d), required by law, or agreed to by a shipper in a service contract. For service contracts, they may not unfairly discriminate in rates or give undue preference or impose undue disadvantage on a place or person because the person is a shippers’ association or an ocean transportation intermediary.

Title 46, §41105

Shipping, Source: USLM XML via OLRC

A conference or group of two or more common carriers may not—

(1)boycott or take any other concerted action resulting in an unreasonable refusal to deal;

(2)engage in conduct that unreasonably restricts the use of intermodal services or technological innovations;

(3)engage in any predatory practice designed to eliminate the participation, or deny the entry, in a particular trade of a common carrier not a member of the conference, a group of common carriers, an ocean tramp, or a bulk carrier;

(4)negotiate with a non-ocean carrier or group of non-ocean carriers (such as truck, rail, or air operators) on any matter relating to rates or services provided to ocean common carriers within the United States by those non-ocean carriers, unless the negotiations and any resulting agreements are not in violation of the antitrust laws and are consistent with the purposes of this part, except that this paragraph does not prohibit the setting and publishing of a joint through rate by a conference, joint venture, or association of ocean common carriers;

(5)negotiate with a tug or towing vessel service provider on any matter relating to rates or services provided within the United States by those tugs or towing vessels;

(6)with respect to a vessel operated by an ocean common carrier within the United States, negotiate for the purchase of certain covered services, unless the negotiations and any resulting agreements are not in violation of the antitrust laws and are consistent with the purposes of this part, except that this paragraph does not prohibit the setting and publishing of a joint through rate by a conference, joint venture, or association of ocean common carriers;

(7)deny in the export foreign commerce of the United States compensation to an ocean freight forwarder or limit that compensation to less than a reasonable amount;

(8)allocate shippers among specific carriers that are parties to the agreement or prohibit a carrier that is a party to the agreement from soliciting cargo from a particular shipper, except as—

(A)authorized by section 40303(d) of this title;

(B)required by the law of the United States or the importing or exporting country; or

(C)agreed to by a shipper in a service contract;

(9)for service pursuant to a service contract, engage in any unjustly discriminatory practice in the matter of rates or charges with respect to any locality, port, or person due to the person’s status as a shippers’ association or ocean transportation intermediary; or

(10)for service pursuant to a service contract, give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage or impose any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage with respect to any locality, port, or person due to the person’s status as a shippers’ association or ocean transportation intermediary.

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Historical and Revision Notes

Revised SectionSource (U.S. Code)Source (Statutes at Large) 4110546 App.:1709(c).Pub. L. 98–237, § 10(c), Mar. 20, 1984, 98 Stat. 77; Pub. L. 105–258, title I, § 109(b), Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1910; Pub. L. 105–383, title IV, § 424(b), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3441. In paragraph (5), the words “ocean freight forwarder” are substituted for “ocean transportation intermediary, as defined by section 1702(17)(A) of this Appendix” because the definition of “ocean transportation intermediary” in section 1702(17)(A) contains a definition of “ocean freight forwarder” which is restated as a separate definition.

Editorial Notes

Amendments

2018—Pars. (5) to (10). Pub. L. 115–282 added pars. (5) and (6) and redesignated former pars. (5) to (8) as (7) to (10), respectively.

§41105 Concerted Action