Title 48 › Chapter 18— MICRONESIA, MARSHALL ISLANDS, AND PALAU › Subchapter I— MICRONESIA AND MARSHALL ISLANDS › Part A— Approval and Implementation of Original Compact › § 1904
Approves the Compact and says the Secretary of State must include a full, yearly report on human rights in the Federated States of Micronesia and the Marshall Islands in the Department of State’s human rights reports. It says naturalized citizens of those countries do not automatically get the Compact’s U.S. entry, work, and residence rights if U.S. officials reasonably infer their citizenship was gained mainly to get those rights. Congress supports FSM and RMI rules that limit long-term land ownership to their own citizens. It also understands FSM and RMI will not allow other governments or nongovernmental groups to carry out the activities listed in section 314(a) of the Compact. The law is not meant to hurt U.S. territories or the State of Hawaii. Starting one year after January 14, 1986, and each year after that, a governor of any U.S. territory or Hawaii may report by February 1 to the Secretary of the Interior about Compact impacts. The Secretary will review and send the reports and Administration comments to Congress, and, on request, help pay for a Micronesian census for affected places at intervals no greater than 5 years after each decennial U.S. census, with total funds for that purpose limited to $300,000 per year. Reports must list harms, recommend fixes, and focus on trade, taxes, immigration, labor, wages, social services, infrastructure, and the environment. Immigration data must include how many used the rights in section 141(a). Reports must include views from Hawaii, the territories, FSM, RMI, and Palau. Congress promises to act quickly and helpfully if harms appear. Funds may be provided after September 30, 1985 to cover costs to Hawaii, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands from increased demand on education and social services caused by immigrants from FSM and RMI. Congress also states it is not responsible for foreign loans or debt taken by FSM or RMI. Clarifies fisheries rules: the U.S. does not recognize FSM or RMI control over highly migratory fish when those fish are outside their territorial sea. Compact money may not be used by FSM or RMI to enforce against U.S. vessels fishing those species outside the territorial sea unless there is a licensing agreement. U.S. officials will apply the Magnuson‑Stevens Act and the Fishermen’s Protective Act for any actions affecting U.S. vessels fishing highly migratory species outside those territorial seas. For those laws, Compact funds count as foreign assistance, Presidential certification under section 5 of the Fishermen’s Protective Act must include a report to Congress, and such certification has no effect if Congress acts within 60 days. The terms “vessel of the United States,” “fishing,” and “highly migratory species” mean what they mean in the cited laws. The United States’ policy is to seek a regional licensing agreement for U.S. tuna vessels with Pacific governments and to promote regional fisheries development; when such an agreement goes to the Senate, the Secretary of State must send a proposed long‑term regional fisheries program covering exploration, harvesting, gear, monitoring, training, and assistance.
Full Legal Text
Territories and Insular Possessions — Source: USLM XML via OLRC
Legislative History
Reference
Citation
48 U.S.C. § 1904
Title 48 — Territories and Insular Possessions
Last Updated
Apr 5, 2026
Release point: 119-73not60