PRIA Logo™
Title 7 — AgricultureRelease 119-73not60

§292 Monopolizing or Restraining Trade and Unduly Enhancing Prices Prohibited; Remedy and Procedure

Title 7 › Chapter 12— ASSOCIATIONS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS PRODUCERS › § 292

Last updated Apr 3, 2026|Official source

Summary

The Secretary of Agriculture must accuse any association he believes is monopolizing or restraining trade across state lines or with other countries so much that it raises the price of an agricultural product unfairly. He must give the association a written complaint with a hearing date and place at least 30 days later. The association can appear at that hearing and try to show why it should not be ordered to stop. Evidence is taken under rules the Secretary makes, put in writing, and kept as the official record. If the Secretary decides the association is causing the problem, he must issue a written order telling it to stop. If the association asks or does not obey for 30 days, the Secretary must file the order and the records in the federal district court where the association’s main office is and tell the Attorney General and the association. The court can approve, change, or cancel the order, issue temporary or permanent injunctions, or give other relief. What the Secretary found counts as initial proof, but either side may offer more evidence. The Department of Justice handles enforcement. Complaints and notices may be handed to any officer or agent running the association’s business or to its lawyer, and that service binds the association and its officers and members.

Full Legal Text

Title 7, §292

Agriculture — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

If the Secretary of Agriculture shall have reason to believe that any such association monopolizes or restrains trade in interstate or foreign commerce to such an extent that the price of any agricultural product is unduly enhanced by reason thereof, he shall serve upon such association a complaint stating his charge in that respect, to which complaint shall be attached, or contained therein, a notice of hearing, specifying a day and place not less than thirty days after the service thereof, requiring the association to show cause why an order should not be made directing it to cease and desist from monopolization or restraint of trade. An association so complained of may at the time and place so fixed show cause why such order should not be entered. The evidence given on such a hearing shall be taken under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of Agriculture may prescribe, reduced to writing, and made a part of the record therein. If upon such hearing the Secretary of Agriculture shall be of the opinion that such association monopolizes or restrains trade in interstate or foreign commerce to such an extent that the price of any agricultural product is unduly enhanced thereby, he shall issue and cause to be served upon the association an order reciting the facts found by him, directing such association to cease and desist from monopolization or restraint of trade. On the request of such association or if such association fails or neglects for thirty days to obey such order, the Secretary of Agriculture shall file in the district court in the judicial district in which such association has its principal place of business a certified copy of the order and of all the records in the proceeding, together with a petition asking that the order be enforced, and shall give notice to the Attorney General and to said association of such filing. Such district court shall thereupon have jurisdiction to enter a decree affirming, modifying, or setting aside said order, or enter such other decree as the court may deem equitable, and may make rules as to pleadings and proceedings to be had in considering such order. The place of trial may, for cause or by consent of parties, be changed as in other causes. The facts found by the Secretary of Agriculture and recited or set forth in said order shall be prima facie evidence of such facts, but either party may adduce additional evidence. The Department of Justice shall have charge of the enforcement of such order. After the order is so filed in such district court and while pending for review therein the court may issue a temporary writ of injunction forbidding such association from violating such order or any part thereof. The court may, upon conclusion of its hearing, enforce its decree by a permanent injunction or other appropriate remedy. Service of such complaint and of all notices may be made upon such association by service upon any officer or agent thereof engaged in carrying on its business, or on any attorney authorized to appear in such proceedings for such association, and such service shall be binding upon such association, the officers, and members thereof.

Legislative History

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Restriction on Use of Funds Respecting Study, Investigation, or Prosecution of any Agricultural Cooperative or Study or Investigation of any Agricul­tural Marketing OrdersFor provisions restricting the use of funds authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 41 et seq. of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, for fiscal year 1980, 1981, or 1982, for the purpose of conducting any study, investigation, or prosecution of any provisions of this chapter, see section 20 of Pub. L. 96–252, set out as a note under section 57c of Title 15.

Reference

Citations & Metadata

Citation

7 U.S.C. § 292

Title 7 — Agriculture

Last Updated

Apr 3, 2026

Release point: 119-73not60