Back to search
Transportation PolicyAviation — Civil Rights & Small Business Programs

Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program — ACDBE Requirements for Federally Funded Airports

9 min read·Updated May 12, 2026

Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program — ACDBE Requirements for Federally Funded Airports

Every major U.S. airport that has received FAA airport development grants since January 1988 must operate an Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) Program — a federally required plan to ensure that small, minority-owned, and women-owned businesses have meaningful opportunities to operate airport concessions: restaurants, retail shops, newsstands, car rental operations, and other service businesses inside airport terminals. The program is authorized by 49 U.S.C. § 47107, which sets a statutory goal that "not less than 10 percent" of concession businesses at federally assisted airports are owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. The implementing regulations at 49 CFR Part 23, administered by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) within the Department of Transportation, govern how airports must structure their ACDBE programs, set participation goals, certify eligible firms, and count participation toward those goals. DOT significantly updated the rules in 2024 (89 FR 24962) and 2025 (90 FR 47978) to strengthen enforcement and align ACDBE certification standards with the parallel DBE program at 49 CFR Part 26.

Current Rule (2026)

ParameterValue
Citation49 CFR Part 23
Issuing agencyFederal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation
Statutory authority49 U.S.C. § 47107; 42 U.S.C. § 2000d (Title VI)
Statutory ACDBE goalNot less than 10% of airport concession businesses
Applies toPrimary airports receiving FAA airport development grants
Personal net worth cap$2,047,000 (adjusted every 2 years)
Quotas/set-asidesProhibited
Last major amendment2025 (90 FR 47978)

What This Rule Does

Part 23 requires primary airports — commercial service airports that handle the largest passenger volumes, including virtually every major U.S. hub — to submit an ACDBE Program Plan to the FAA Regional Civil Rights Office for approval. The plan must explain how the airport will structure its concession opportunities, set numerical goals for ACDBE participation, maintain a certified ACDBE directory, monitor compliance, and report results to the FAA annually.

The program's most important design choice: quotas and set-asides are explicitly prohibited. Instead, airports set aspirational "goals" expressed as a percentage of projected concession revenues — one goal for car rental operations, a separate goal for all other concessions — and then deploy race-neutral and race-conscious "measures" (restructuring concession packages, providing business development assistance, mentor-protégé programs) to reach those goals. If race-conscious measures become necessary, airports may use ACDBE-specific programs, but they cannot reserve concession space exclusively for ACDBE firms.

The statutory 10% figure in § 47107 is a national benchmark, not a per-airport mandate. Each airport sets its own goal based on an analysis of available ACDBE firms in its local market. If no ACDBEs operate in a particular concession category at that airport, the airport cannot simply paper over the gap by assigning the statutory 10% to that category.

Key Mechanics

The certification gateway is 49 CFR Part 23, § 23.31. An ACDBE firm must be (a) a small business under SBA size standards, (b) owned and controlled by one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, (c) managed day-to-day by those owners, and (d) independently eligible under 49 CFR Part 26. Social disadvantage is presumed for Black Americans, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans, Asian Pacific Americans, Subcontinent Asian Americans, and women — but the airport or DOT can rebut the presumption with evidence. Economic disadvantage turns on the owner's personal net worth (PNW), which must not exceed $2,047,000 (§ 23.33), with the owner's primary residence equity and their stake in the firm excluded from the calculation. DOT adjusts this cap every two years for inflation.

A practical shortcut: § 23.37 allows cross-certification. If you already hold a DBE certificate under 49 CFR Part 26 from your state's Unified Certification Program (UCP), you are presumed eligible for ACDBE status. Airports cannot demand a separate ACDBE application from a firm holding a current DBE certificate.

Goal-setting works on a two-track structure under § 23.41. Airports calculate one overall ACDBE goal for car rental concessions (measured as a share of total car rental gross receipts) and a separate goal for all other concessions (food, retail, news/gifts, ground transport, etc.). The two-track structure exists because car rental markets have very different competitive dynamics and ACDBE availability than food-and-beverage or retail concessions. Under §§ 23.47–23.49, car rental gross receipts include only vehicle rental fees paid by airport customers — fleet financing and wholesale vehicle sales are excluded.

Participation only counts toward goals when it is real. § 23.55's commercially useful function (CUF) requirement says an ACDBE must actually provide or manage the concession service with its own employees and resources. An arrangement where an ACDBE receives a fee for lending its certification to a non-disadvantaged operator — without actually running the business — does not count. FAA reviewers and DOT Office of Civil Rights auditors scrutinize CUF compliance closely during program reviews.

§ 23.75 protects ACDBE market access at the structural level by prohibiting airports from entering long-term exclusive concession agreements (generally longer than 7 years) in any category without FAA approval. This directly targets the industry practice of awarding 20-to-30-year master concession contracts to large national operators, which historically crowded out smaller, ACDBE-eligible firms.

When an airport falls short of its ACDBE goal, § 23.57's good faith efforts standard applies. The airport is not automatically penalized if it can document genuine attempts: actively recruiting ACDBE firms, breaking up concession packages into smaller lots accessible to smaller businesses, providing technical assistance and financing support, and structuring contract provisions that create real entry points. Documented good faith efforts are the airport's primary defense in an FAA compliance review.

How It Affects You

If you own a small business and qualify as socially and economically disadvantaged: ACDBE certification can open the door to one of the most lucrative commercial real estate markets in the country — airport terminal space. A single food-and-beverage concession at a large hub airport can generate millions of dollars in annual revenue. The path: apply for DBE certification through your state's UCP (find your state's UCP at DOT's website), which simultaneously qualifies you for ACDBE status. The ACDBE certification shares its framework with the broader federal small business contracting system — see Small Business Contracting for the parallel 8(a), HUBZone, and WOSB programs. You will need to document your ownership structure, demonstrate day-to-day control of the business, and show that your personal net worth falls below $2,047,000 (excluding your home equity and your stake in the business). Once certified and listed in the airport's ACDBE directory, you can respond to concession solicitations and be counted toward the airport's ACDBE participation goals.

If you manage or operate an airport: Part 23 compliance is not optional — it is a condition of continued FAA airport development funding. Airport improvement construction projects funded by FAA grants carry separate labor obligations under the Davis-Bacon prevailing wage rules — a parallel federal requirement that applies to construction workers on the same grant-funded projects. Your ACDBE program plan needs updating every three years, or sooner if concession revenues or the local ACDBE market shifts materially. The 2025 rule update (§ 23.81, effective October 3, 2025) added a mandatory systematic reevaluation of every firm currently in your certified ACDBE directory. You must work with your UCP to notify certified firms, collect updated documentation, and remove firms that no longer meet standards. Airports that allow stale certifications to remain on their directory risk FAA findings of noncompliance. On the contract side, review any master concession agreements coming up for renewal against the long-term exclusive agreement rules (§ 23.75) before signing extensions.

If you are a large national concessionaire (HMSHost, Delaware North, SSP America, and similar operators): ACDBE compliance obligations flow through your master concession agreements with airports. The airport's ACDBE goal applies to the entire concession program, and airports count on master concessionaires to help meet it — either through certified ACDBE subcontractors, certified ACDBE-operated locations within your portfolio, or other counted participation. The commercially useful function rule (§ 23.55) means that nominal partnerships — paying an ACDBE a small fee to attach its name to your operation — will not pass scrutiny. ACDBEs must actually operate the concession. FAA auditors review CUF compliance and airports face enforcement consequences if their master concessionaire's ACDBE counting does not hold up.

The ACDBE program rests on two statutory pillars. 49 U.S.C. § 47107 ("Project grant application approval conditioned on assurances about airport operations") conditions FAA airport development grants on an airport sponsor's assurance that small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals will account for "not less than 10 percent" of concession businesses at the airport. This provision also grants DOT the rulemaking authority to set implementing regulations — which DOT has exercised through 49 CFR Part 23. The section also requires airports to maintain an approved airport layout plan, prohibits unreasonable exclusive rights, and empowers the Secretary to impose civil penalties equal to double any illegally diverted airport funds. 42 U.S.C. § 2000d (Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in programs receiving federal financial assistance; because airport concessions operate within a federally funded airport, Title VI applies. The ACDBE program must be structured to remedy documented past discrimination in airport concessions without creating new discrimination — which is why quotas are prohibited and why race-conscious measures require specific justification.

Two related statutes complete the picture. 49 U.S.C. § 47113 ("Minority and disadvantaged business participation") requires that at least 10 percent of the funds available each fiscal year under 49 U.S.C. § 48103 (the Airport Improvement Program appropriation) go to small businesses owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals or to qualified HUBZone small businesses. This 10% set-aside applies to airport construction and improvement contracts — distinct from the § 47107 ACDBE requirement that covers airport concession businesses. The Secretary must establish uniform certification rules for states and airport sponsors, including on-site visits, interviews, license and ownership checks, bonding and financial checks, and review of equipment and past work. 49 U.S.C. § 332 established a DOT Minority Resource Center to assist minority entrepreneurs — including women, per the statute's definition — in securing work on U.S. railroad maintenance and improvement projects. While § 332 targets rail, it reflects the same congressional policy framework authorizing DOT to run minority business assistance programs across transportation modes. For minority business development support outside the transportation context, see Minority Business Development Agency.

Pending Legislation

Congress has periodically introduced bills to expand or streamline the DBE/ACDBE framework, though most have not advanced to enactment. Recent examples from the DB record:

  • H.R. 7866 (117th Congress, 2022) — Giving Disadvantaged Businesses Opportunities for Success Act. Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit. Would have made adjustments to DBE eligibility and opportunity access; no floor vote.
  • H.R. 7149 (117th Congress, 2022) — Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Supportive Services Expansion Act. Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation. Focused on expanding technical assistance and supportive services for DBE/ACDBE firms.
  • H.R. 6514 (115th Congress, 2018) — Streamlining Small Disadvantaged Businesses Act. Referred to the House Committee on Small Business. Sought to reduce administrative burden in the certification process.
  • H.R. 4453 (114th Congress, 2016) — Would have amended the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to require review of disadvantaged small business contract numbers at airports with DBE programs. Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
  • H.R. 4326 (114th Congress, 2016) — Small and Disadvantaged Business Enhancement Act of 2016. Passed the House and received in the Senate; referred to Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee.

The recurring legislative activity reflects an ongoing debate about whether the current DBE/ACDBE framework effectively creates real opportunities or generates paperwork without changing market outcomes. For comparison, the federal government runs a separate concession program on public lands — see National Park Concessions — which operates under different statutory authority (54 U.S.C. § 101911 et seq.) and does not carry a parallel minority business participation requirement.

Recent Rulemakings

2024 amendment (89 FR 24962) — Realigned the ACDBE program with DOT's contemporaneous updates to 49 CFR Part 26 (the broader DBE program). Key changes: DOT can now adjust the PNW cap every two years administratively, without a new rulemaking; monitoring and reporting requirements were strengthened; mentor-protégé program provisions were updated.

2025 amendment (90 FR 47978) — Added § 23.81, the mandatory ACDBE reevaluation process effective October 3, 2025. Airports and UCPs must affirmatively identify all currently certified ACDBE firms, issue notice, and process updated documentation submissions. The goal is to purge stale certifications and ensure the ACDBE directory accurately reflects firms that currently qualify. Size standard references were also updated to align with current SBA tables.

Pending Action

No active notice-and-comment rulemakings are pending as of early 2026. The FAA is monitoring implementation of the October 2025 reevaluation mandate (§ 23.81) and may issue compliance guidance if airports and UCPs encounter difficulty completing the systematic review. Airport industry groups and ACDBE advocates have raised questions about how DOT will calculate the next biennial PNW cap adjustment (expected 2026), particularly given the elevated inflation of the 2022–2024 period. Any upward adjustment to the cap would expand the pool of owners who qualify as economically disadvantaged; a large adjustment could face legal challenge from industry groups that argue the program stretches its statutory bounds.

At My Address

See how Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program — ACDBE Requirements for Federally Funded Airports plays out in your area

Pull up the federal-data report for any U.S. ZIP — federal spending, environmental risk, hospitals, schools, your reps, all on one page.

Enter your address