Back to search
Government OperationsExecutive Branch — Cabinet Departments

USCIS — U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services

10 min read·Updated May 14, 2026

USCIS — U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services

  • 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq. (Immigration and Nationality Act) — Primary statutory framework governing all immigration benefits adjudicated by USCIS; defines visa categories, eligibility criteria, grounds of inadmissibility, naturalization requirements, and asylum standards
  • 8 U.S.C. § 1153 — Preference allocation for family-sponsored and employment-based immigrant visas; determines the annual visa caps and preference categories USCIS adjudicates
  • 8 U.S.C. § 1158 — Asylum; USCIS Asylum Division adjudicates affirmative asylum applications from persons not in removal proceedings
  • 8 U.S.C. § 1427 — Naturalization eligibility requirements (5-year LPR, continuous residence, good moral character, English language and civics knowledge)
  • 6 U.S.C. § 271 — Homeland Security Act; establishes USCIS as a component of DHS with responsibility for adjudicating immigration and naturalization petitions and applications

Key Mechanics

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the DHS component responsible for adjudicating all immigration benefits applications under the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq.) — green cards, work visas, naturalization, asylum, DACA, and related status. Unlike CBP (entry control) or ICE (enforcement and removal), USCIS is a benefits-adjudicating agency: it reviews petitions and applications filed by immigrants, employers, and U.S. citizen/LPR relatives and determines eligibility for lawful immigration status. USCIS is funded almost entirely by application fees rather than congressional appropriations, making it structurally dependent on application volume. Key adjudication functions: (1) Family-based immigration — USCIS adjudicates I-130 petitions establishing qualifying relationships; visa availability is controlled by annual per-country and per-preference caps (8 U.S.C. § 1153); (2) Employment-based immigration — H-1B, L-1, O-1, and EB visa petitions; H-1B subject to annual lottery (85,000 cap); (3) Adjustment of status — I-485 applications converting nonimmigrant to immigrant status; (4) Naturalization — N-400 applications requiring 5-year LPR status, continuous residence, English language, and civics knowledge (§ 1427); (5) Asylum — affirmative asylum applications from persons not in removal proceedings; (6) DACA renewals — administratively under active litigation. USCIS processing backlogs across most categories are measured in years, creating systemic delays for employers and families.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is the DHS component that adjudicates applications for immigration benefits — green cards, work visas, naturalization, asylum, and related status — serving as the administrative gateway through which approximately 8-10 million applicants per year seek to obtain or maintain lawful immigration status in the United States. Unlike CBP (which controls entry) or ICE (which enforces removal), USCIS is primarily a benefits-adjudicating agency: it reviews petitions and applications filed by immigrants, employers, and U.S. citizen relatives and determines eligibility for lawful status under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq.). The agency is funded almost entirely by application fees — not congressional appropriations — making it structurally dependent on application volume for its operating budget, and creating a structural incentive to process applications rather than reduce backlogs. The USCIS backlogs — with some adjustment-of-status applications waiting 5-10+ years, and H-1B lottery visa demand far exceeding the 85,000 annual cap — are among the most consequential administrative failures in U.S. immigration policy, affecting the workforce planning of major technology companies, the family reunification timelines of millions of petitioners, and the humanitarian protection available to asylum seekers.

Organization & Structure

ParameterValue
Statutory basisHomeland Security Act of 2002; Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq.)
Parent departmentDepartment of Homeland Security
HeadDirector (Senate-confirmed)
Employees~19,000
Budget~$4.5 billion (FY 2025; ~97% fee-funded)
Applications received~8-10 million annually
Key programsGreen card (LPR); naturalization; H-1B; asylum; DACA; TPS; refugee status

USCIS was created from the abolished INS's benefits functions in 2003. The Director is Senate-confirmed and reports to the DHS Secretary. USCIS operates through a national network of field offices, application support centers (for biometrics), service centers (processing centers for volume adjudication), and asylum offices. The agency's fee structure — established by regulation, not statute — allows the Director to set fees sufficient to fund operations without appropriated funds, giving the Director administrative flexibility unavailable to most federal agencies.

Key Functions & Authorities

Family-based immigration — the INA's family preference categories (8 U.S.C. § 1153) allow U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents (LPRs) to petition for immigrant visas for qualifying relatives. U.S. citizens may petition for immediate relatives (spouses, minor children, parents) who have no numerical cap; other categories (adult children, siblings) are subject to annual per-country caps that create backlogs of decades for nationals of high-demand countries (Philippines, India, Mexico, China). USCIS adjudicates the I-130 family petition; the State Department then processes the immigrant visa abroad through National Visa Center.

Employment-based immigration — USCIS adjudicates employer petitions for employment-based immigrant visas (EB-1 through EB-5) and nonimmigrant work visas (H-1B for specialty occupation workers, L-1 for intracompany transferees, O-1 for extraordinary ability, TN for Canada/Mexico professionals). The H-1B cap (65,000 regular cap + 20,000 advanced degree exemption) is dramatically oversubscribed: in recent years, USCIS receives 400,000-600,000 H-1B registrations for the 85,000 slots, requiring a random selection lottery. The EB-5 immigrant investor program (10,000 annual visas) requires investments in job-creating enterprises; USCIS adjudicates investor petitions under complex USCIS regulations.

Naturalization — USCIS administers naturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1427: applicants must have been LPRs for 5 years (3 for spouses of U.S. citizens), demonstrate good moral character, pass English and civics tests, and take the Oath of Allegiance. USCIS administers approximately 800,000-1 million naturalization ceremonies annually. Naturalized citizenship is the most protected immigration status — it can be revoked only through denaturalization proceedings in federal court based on fraud or illegal procurement.

Asylum (affirmative) — USCIS's Asylum Division adjudicates affirmative asylum applications — applications filed by individuals already in the United States who are not in removal proceedings. (Defensive asylum is adjudicated by EOIR immigration judges in DOJ.) Affirmative asylum applicants have 1 year from entry to apply; USCIS asylum officers conduct interviews and determine whether the applicant has a well-founded fear of persecution on a protected ground (race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or particular social group). USCIS's affirmative asylum backlog has grown to 1+ million cases, with wait times of 5+ years.

DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) — the Obama administration's 2012 DACA program, administered by USCIS, defers removal action for approximately 600,000 noncitizens brought to the United States as children and grants them 2-year renewable work authorization. DACA's legal status has been contested through a decade of litigation: the Trump administration rescinded it in 2017 (stayed by the Supreme Court in DHS v. Regents, 2020); the Biden administration attempted to codify it by regulation (challenged in Texas v. United States); the Fifth Circuit found the regulatory DACA unlawful but stayed the ruling for current recipients. USCIS continues to process DACA renewals under court orders.

Temporary Protected Status (TPS) — TPS is a temporary immigration benefit granted by the DHS Secretary to nationals of designated countries experiencing armed conflict, natural disasters, or other extraordinary conditions. Approximately 600,000-700,000 individuals have TPS; major designations include El Salvador, Honduras, Haiti, Venezuela, Ukraine, and Yemen. TPS holders receive deportation deferral and work authorization but not a path to permanent residence. TPS designations have been used extensively and are frequently contested when administrations attempt to terminate them.

Implementing Regulations — IRCA and LIFE Act Legalization (8 CFR Part 245a)

The largest legalization program in U.S. history is implemented at 8 CFR Part 245a — Adjustment of Status to That of Persons Admitted for Temporary or Permanent Resident Status Under Section 245A of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Section 245A was added to the INA by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), which offered a path to legal permanent residence for undocumented immigrants who had resided continuously in the United States since before January 1, 1982. IRCA's legalization resulted in approximately 2.7 million people obtaining lawful status — the largest single amnesty in U.S. history. Part 245a also implements the LIFE Act Legalization (Legal Immigration Family Equity Act, 2000), which reopened the legalization window for members of certain class-action lawsuits (CSS, LULAC, Zambrano) who were denied IRCA legalization in the original program. Key provisions:

  • § 245a.1 — Definitions: the INA § 245A applicant must demonstrate continuous residence in unlawful status since before January 1, 1982 through May 4, 1988; the Act amended by IRCA defines "unlawful status" — certain visa overstays, entries without inspection, and other categories qualify; brief, casual, and innocent departures from the U.S. do not break continuous residence

  • § 245a.11 — LIFE Act eligibility (LPR adjustment): to adjust to full LPR status under LIFE Legalization, an eligible alien must demonstrate: (a) previous membership in the qualifying class-action lawsuits (CSS v. Meese, LULAC v. INS, or Zambrano v. INS); (b) continuous residence since before January 1, 1982; (c) admissibility to the United States; and (d) absence of criminal disqualifiers

  • § 245a.12 — LIFE Act filing window: the LIFE Legalization application period opened June 1, 2001 and closed June 4, 2003; applications filed after that date are ineligible; this finite window created a significant deadline pressure for potential LIFE Act applicants

  • § 245a.13 — Status during pendency: when an eligible alien submits a prima facie application for adjustment under § 245a, the Service may grant employment authorization and protection from deportation while the application is pending; this interim protection prevented applicants from being removed during the adjudication process

  • § 245a.14 — Class membership determination: for LIFE Legalization, the Service first determines whether the alien filed a written claim for class membership in one of the qualifying lawsuits before the relevant claim deadline; class membership proof typically involves court records or agency records from the original lawsuit proceedings

  • § 245a.15 — Continuous residence standard: the applicant must prove continuous residence in unlawful status since before January 1, 1982 through May 4, 1988; acceptable proof includes rent receipts, utility bills, employment records, school records, medical records, and affidavits; the Service evaluates totality of evidence given that undocumented immigrants often have limited documentation of their presence

  • § 245a.16 — Continuous physical presence: separately from continuous residence, applicants must prove continuous physical presence from November 6, 1986 (IRCA enactment date) through May 4, 1988; brief absences (for emergencies, humanitarian reasons) may be excused by the Service

  • § 245a.17 — Citizenship skills: applicants must meet the requirements of INA § 312(a) — minimum English language proficiency and knowledge of U.S. civics, history, and government — or qualify for an exemption (age 65+, or physical/developmental disability); the original IRCA program accepted enrollment in English and civics education classes in lieu of demonstrated proficiency at application time

  • § 245a.18 — Ineligibility grounds: aliens convicted of a felony or three or more misdemeanors are ineligible; aliens who assisted in persecution of others on account of race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group are ineligible; security-related grounds of inadmissibility apply

    IRCA's legalization program is one of the most significant immigration policy events in modern U.S. history. The 2.7 million IRCA legalizations — combined with 1 million agricultural worker legalizations under IRCA's separate Special Agricultural Worker (SAW) program — transformed the legal status of a significant portion of the country's undocumented population in 1986–1988. The long-term policy debate over whether IRCA's employer sanctions (the other major component, making it illegal to hire undocumented workers) actually reduced unauthorized immigration or simply pushed it underground has continued for decades. Part 245a's application period has long since closed for new IRCA filers; the regulation now primarily governs the residual adjudication of applications filed before the deadlines and the ongoing administration of status adjustments for LIFE Act class members.

How It Affects You

<!-- pria:personalize type="impact" -->

If you are a citizen or voter: U.S. citizens who want to petition for immigrant relatives must interact with USCIS; processing times determine how quickly family reunification occurs. Naturalization — the final step in the legal immigration process — is USCIS-administered. USCIS fee changes and application backlogs affect constituent services in congressional offices, which receive substantial case work on delayed USCIS applications.

If you are a business or regulated entity: Employers that sponsor H-1B workers for specialty occupation positions must navigate USCIS's lottery system, petition processing, and requests for evidence (RFEs) that can delay work authorization. USCIS's I-9 employment verification requirements apply to all U.S. employers; E-Verify (voluntary federal electronic verification system) is USCIS-administered. Large technology companies, financial firms, and healthcare systems are the largest H-1B sponsors; their workforce planning depends on USCIS processing times and lottery results.

If you work at a federal agency: USCIS coordinates with the State Department (consular processing of immigrant visas); DOJ's EOIR (defensive asylum and removal cases involving USCIS benefit applications); DOL (labor condition applications for H-1B petitions, which USCIS receives after DOL certification); and CBP (admission of visa holders at ports of entry). USCIS fee rule changes require OMB review; major policy changes go through notice-and-comment rulemaking.

If you are a journalist, researcher, or policy analyst: USCIS publishes quarterly processing time reports for each application type and office, the primary source for tracking backlogs. Annual immigration statistics (yearbook) compile data on LPR admissions, naturalizations, and nonimmigrant admissions by category and nationality. The USCIS Policy Manual (published online) is the authoritative adjudicator guidance; policy memoranda are published as they are issued. The Migration Policy Institute, National Immigration Forum, and American Immigration Lawyers Association track USCIS policy developments closely.

<!-- /pria:personalize -->

Recent Developments

  • 2025 — The Trump administration issued an executive order terminating humanitarian parole programs for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans (CHNV) and directed USCIS to revoke parole grants for approximately 530,000 beneficiaries, generating litigation; the administration also sought to end birthright citizenship via executive order (immediately challenged as unconstitutional); USCIS began terminating DACA renewals for recipients with certain contacts with law enforcement.
  • 2024 — USCIS finalized a major fee rule increasing application fees by an average of 26% (some forms increasing substantially more) to address the agency's structural funding deficit; the rule took effect in April 2024.
  • 2023 — USCIS experienced its highest-ever application receipts: 11 million applications received, driven by affirmative asylum applications, DACA renewals, and employment-based backlogs; processing times for many benefit types remained 18-24+ months.
  • 2022 — The Keeping Families Together parole program and other humanitarian parole programs expanded USCIS's role in adjudicating parole requests — a temporary status that is a statutory tool of the Secretary, not a separate benefit category — dramatically; the programs became a target of Republican litigation and the 2025 terminations.
  • 2012 — DACA was announced by the Obama administration and implemented by USCIS through a policy memorandum (not a rule) in June 2012; the program has been continuously operative (with interruptions due to litigation) since, making it one of the most consequential immigration policy decisions in recent decades.

At My Address

See how USCIS — U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services plays out in your area

Pull up the federal-data report for any U.S. ZIP — federal spending, environmental risk, hospitals, schools, your reps, all on one page.

Enter your address