← All companies

FSTR · CIK 0000352825

What L.B. Foster Company told the SEC could break it.

L.B. Foster's largest disclosed risk is a long-tail environmental liability: it is a potentially responsible party at an EPA harbor Superfund site whose selected remedy the EPA estimates at roughly $1.1 billion on a net-present-value basis ($1.7 billion undiscounted), with cleanup expected to take as long as 13 years. As a steel-sourcing manufacturer selling across Brazil, Canada, China, India, Mexico, the UK and the EU, it is also exposed to US steel and aluminum tariffs and retaliatory foreign measures that raise costs and create operational uncertainty. And certain divisions depend on a few suppliers — its Protective Coatings unit predominantly on two epoxy-coating suppliers and Rail Products on a limited number — so losing one could materially hurt operations.

3 self-disclosed vulnerabilities, pulled from its own filings — each in the company’s words, with the source. This is the risk register almost nobody reads.

In its own words

What could break it.

Litigation

  • EPA harbor-site environmental remediation liability (Superfund)high

    L.B. Foster is a PRP at an EPA harbor site whose selected remedy the EPA estimates at ~$1.1B NPV ($1.7B undiscounted) over as long as 13 years, exposing the Company to material long-tail environmental liability.

    The net present value and undiscounted costs of the selected remedy throughout the harbor site are estimated by the EPA to be approximately $ 1.1 billion and $ 1.7 billion, respectively, and the remedial work is expected to take as long as 13 years to complete.

    SEC filing →As of 2026

Regulatory & policy

  • steel/aluminum tariffs and retaliatory trade measuresmedium

    U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum and retaliatory foreign tariffs create cost and operational uncertainty for L.B. Foster, which sources steel and sells into Brazil, Canada, China, India, Mexico, the UK and the EU.

    The US government has imposed tariffs on certain foreign goods, including steel and aluminum, and has indicated the possibility of additional tariffs on other goods. In response, several foreign governments have imposed retaliatory tariffs on US goods. Uncertainties surrounding tariffs, trade agreements, or any potential trade disputes could cause disruptions in our operations and increase our costs.

Supplier concentration

  • Protective Coatings division dependent on two epoxy-coating suppliers; Rail on limited suppliersmedium

    Certain L.B. Foster divisions depend on a small number of suppliers — Protective Coatings is predominantly reliant on two epoxy-coating suppliers and Rail Products on a limited number — so losing one could materially harm operations.

    In our Rail Products business unit, we rely on a limited number of suppliers for key products that we sell to our customers. Our Protective Coatings division is predominately dependent on two suppliers of epoxy coating.

    SEC filing →As of 2026

In the MyPRIA app, this is checked against the companies you actually own.

← World Watch