What lululemon athletica inc. told the SEC could break it.

Lululemon's fabric sourcing is geographically concentrated — 34% Taiwan, 29% China Mainland, 10% South Korea, 10% Vietnam in 2025 — exposing it to Taiwan geopolitical/military-conflict risk for technical fabrics.

“A significant portion of our technical fabrics originates from Taiwan, and any military conflict, trade embargo, or disruption affecting that region could materially impact our ability to source materials and fulfill customer orders.”

New 2025 U.S. tariffs (10% baseline plus higher country rates) and elimination of the de minimis exemption (Aug 2025; statutory repeal by July 2027) reduced Lululemon's 2025 gross profit by ~$275M, with continued impact expected — many U.S. e-commerce orders ship from Canadian DCs that lost the exemption.

“The unmitigated impact of increased tariffs and the removal of the de minimis exemption resulted in a reduction to gross profit for 2025 of approximately $275 million.”

Lululemon owns no manufacturing and relies on a limited number of vendors — ~51 product vendors, five of which made 47% of products (largest 15%) in 2025, and top-five fabric suppliers made 48% (largest 20%) — mostly without long-term contracts.

“We obtain our fabrics and produce our products through a limited number of suppliers. We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. ... Product manufacturing - We work with approximately 51 vendors, five of which produced 47% of our products in 2025, with the largest manufacturer producing 15%.”

China Mainland was 16% of 2025 net revenue (growing 29%), concentrating both growth and geopolitical/consumer exposure; U.S. political polarization has also raised the risk of brand boycotts and public-pressure campaigns.

“Political polarization in the United States has also led to increased consumer activism, brand boycotts, and public pressure campaigns targeting companies based on their perceived political or social positions.”