MLKN · CIK 0000066382
What MillerKnoll, Inc. told the SEC could break it.
2 self-disclosed vulnerabilities, pulled from its own filings — each in the company’s words, with the source. This is the risk register almost nobody reads.
A limited set so far — we surface every cited disclosure we’ve extracted for MLKN. More may follow as additional filings are processed.
In its own words
What could break it.
Commodity & input dependence
- Direct-material commodity exposure — steel (the key commodity), plus aluminum, plastics, textiles and wood particleboard are the largest direct-material costs; results swing with commodity prices (a ~$5.7M cost benefit in FY2025 from lower steel/aluminum)medium
As a furniture manufacturer (Herman Miller, Knoll and related brands), MillerKnoll's cost of goods is sensitive to commodity prices: its largest direct-material costs are for steel — described as a key commodity it consumes — along with aluminum, plastics, textiles and wood particleboard. Movements in these prices flow directly to margins; in fiscal 2025 lower steel and aluminum costs reduced the Company's costs by roughly $5.7 million versus the prior year, illustrating the leverage. Rising steel/aluminum/resin prices (or tariff-driven steel inflation) would pressure gross margin, which the company offsets with pricing and lean manufacturing. Suppliers are multi-sourced and unnamed, so a commodity-input risk rather than an edge. Severity medium.
“The largest of such costs incurred by the Company are for steel, plastics, textiles, wood particleboard and aluminum components.”
Regulatory & policy
- Import tariffs / trade policy raising input costs — tariff-related costs cut FY2025 gross margin by ~30 bps; China tariffs lifted steel costs (China direct materials ~3% of cost of sales); retaliatory-tariff cycle adds further pressuremedium
MillerKnoll faces realized trade-policy cost pressure: tariff-related costs negatively impacted fiscal 2025 gross margin by approximately 30 basis points, and tariffs on imports — most notably from China — have raised the cost of steel, a key commodity it consumes (direct materials purchased from China were an estimated ~3% of consolidated cost of sales in FY2025, limiting but not eliminating the exposure). New U.S. tariffs and the resulting retaliatory-tariff cycle create added cost pressure on globally sourced component parts and finished products; the company is using pricing actions and other mitigation to offset the net impact over time. A quantified, current trade-policy exposure on its global manufacturing supply chain. Severity medium.
“Tariff-related costs negatively impacted gross margin by 30 basis points in the year.”
In the MyPRIA app, this is checked against the companies you actually own.
← World Watch