← All companies

SWBI · CIK 0001092796

What Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. told the SEC could break it.

Smith & Wesson's disclosures cluster around how concentrated and how regulated its operations are. It sells mostly through distributors — its top five accounted for about 45% of net sales in fiscal 2025 — and it makes everything in just four plants across three locations, with key components for most products and its core R&D housed at a single Springfield, Massachusetts site, so a disruption there (or in its ongoing $114 million-plus relocation) could impair production. Surrounding all of it is the regulation specific to firearms: extensive federal and state rules plus export controls under which the State Department licenses international sales, Congress can block any export-controlled sale of $1 million or more, and new BIS rules tightened exports in May 2024 — while, like other manufacturers, it also faces raw-material and tariff cost pressure from the April 2025 reciprocal tariffs.

4 self-disclosed vulnerabilities, pulled from its own filings — each in the company’s words, with the source. This is the risk register almost nobody reads.

In its own words

What could break it.

Commodity & input dependence

  • raw materials (steel, wood, lead, brass, plastics) with alternative sources, plus exposure to tariffs already imposed on certain products (April 2025 reciprocal tariffs)medium

    Smith & Wesson uses numerous raw materials — steel, wood, lead, brass and plastics — to produce and test its products (with alternative sources available), but it is exposed to protectionist trade restrictions and is currently subject to tariffs on certain of its products, with more products potentially becoming tariffed in the future; the April 2025 worldwide reciprocal tariffs and retaliatory measures, together with raw-material/component price increases and shortages, could raise costs and pressure margins.

    We are currently subject to tariffs on certain of our products, and other of our products could become subject to tariffs in the future.

    SEC filing →As of 2025

Customer concentration

  • top five U.S. commercial distributors = ~45% of net sales (no individual ≥10%; sales flow ~91% through federal firearm licensees to consumers)medium

    Smith & Wesson sells primarily through distributors, and its top five U.S. commercial distributors together accounted for approximately 45%, 46% and 44% of net sales in fiscal 2025/2024/2023; although the company believes losing one would not be material (since the non-exclusive distributors share dealer customers and volume would reallocate), this distributor concentration still channels the large majority of its sales through a handful of intermediaries, and ~91% of net sales flow through federal firearm licensees to domestic consumers.

    Our top five commercial distributors in the United States accounted for a total of 45%, 46%, and 44% of our net sales for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.

    SEC filing →As of 2025

Other disclosures

  • facility concentration / Relocation execution risk — only four facilities in three locations; key components produced at the single Springfield, MA facilitymedium

    Smith & Wesson operates in only four manufacturing facilities across three locations (Maryville TN, Springfield MA, and Houlton ME), and it produces key components for most products — plus houses principal R&D/engineering — at its single Springfield facility, so a disruption at any critical site could materially impair production; this is compounded by execution risk from its ongoing Relocation (a cost-plus construction contract with a $114.0M guaranteed minimum, $158.0M of related capex spent through April 30, 2025) that may not realize expected benefits.

    We operate in only four facilities located in three locations, and our success depends on our ability to operate each facility efficiently. We produce key components for most of our products at our Springfield facility, which also houses our principal research, development, engineering, and design functions.

    SEC filing →As of 2025

Regulatory & policy

  • extensive firearms regulation and export controls — State Department licensing, Congressional block of $1M+ export sales, May 2024 BIS rulesmedium

    Smith & Wesson's firearms business is subject to extensive federal/state regulation and to export controls: international transactions require U.S. government licenses (which are discretionary), Congress may block a proposed export-controlled firearms sale valued at $1 million or more, and new Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) rules effective May 2024 further restrict exports — so political or regulatory decisions beyond its control can prevent it from obtaining export licenses or completing profitable contracts.

    Congress may block a proposed sale of firearms that are export controlled by the Department of State valued at $1 million or more. Consequently, we may not be able to obtain export licenses or complete profitable contracts as a result of political or other reasons that are beyond our control.

The hidden graph

Who it depends on, and who depends on it.

Relationships surfaced from filings — including ones disclosed by the other side, which is how the non-obvious ones come to light.

Its suppliers

  • The Christman Company

    The parties to the Construction Contract agreed that Christman will perform and complete the Work (as defined therein) on a cost-plus basis for a guaranteed minimum price of $ 114.0 million, including contingencies.

    Cited →

In the MyPRIA app, this is checked against the companies you actually own.

← World Watch