2026-02112Notice

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Enhance the Correlation Calculation for Bond Haircut Models and Make Other Changes

Published Date: 2/3/2026

Notice

Summary

The Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC) is updating how it calculates bond risk to make it smarter and more accurate. These changes affect financial firms that use FICC’s bond clearing services and could improve how much money they need to set aside for safety. The updates are proposed now, and the public can comment before they take effect.

Analyzed Economic Effects

4 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 4 costs, 0 mixed.

Use Alternate Vendor Correlations

FICC proposes to allow the use of index data from an alternate vendor to calculate correlations for short-term bond maturity buckets (Treasury 0–6 months, Treasury 6–12 months, and TIPS 0–12 months) when the designated vendor does not provide index data. Previously, correlations for those buckets were manually set to zero; changing this may increase Required Fund Deposits and Segregated Customer Margin Requirements for FICC Members.

Some Members Face Multi‑Million Dollar Hikes

At the Member Margin Portfolio level over the impact study period, FICC found the average start-of-day VaR Charge would have increased by about $0.22 million (0.09%). The largest average percentage increase for any Member Margin Portfolio would have been about 14.52% ($0.38 million) and the largest average dollar increase about $5.91 million (0.79%). If Margin Proxy were deployed, the average increase would be about $0.42 million (0.16%), with the largest percentage increase about 23.18% ($0.59 million) and the largest dollar increase about $17.35 million (0.34%).

Aggregate VaR Charges Increase

FICC's impact study for September 1, 2024 through August 31, 2025 found that, if the change had been in place, the average increase to aggregate VaR Charges at GSD would have been about $46 million (0.09%), with the largest increase about $85 million (0.15%). If Margin Proxy were deployed, the average increase would have been about $88 million (0.16%), with the largest increase about $163 million (0.38%).

Higher Margins Could Burden Weaker Firms

FICC states that increases in Required Fund Deposits and/or Segregated Customer Margin Requirements resulting from this change could burden participants that have lower operating margins or higher costs of capital than other participants. FICC notes the burden could affect competition among participants.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Key Dates

Published Date
2/3/2026

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Securities and Exchange Commission
Source: View HTML
Back to Federal Register

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in