Designation of English as the Official Language of the United States Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Aderholt
Introduced
Summary
Designates English as the official language of the United States. This bill would set a uniform English-language framework for federal conduct and naturalization while carving out narrow exceptions for other-language use.
Show full summary
- Immigrants and naturalization applicants: The bill would require naturalization ceremonies to be conducted in English and direct the Department of Homeland Security to propose a uniform English test within 180 days. The standard would be grounded in the ability to read the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and laws made under the Constitution.
- Federal agencies and officials: The bill would require official government functions to be conducted in English and impose an affirmative obligation on federal officials to preserve and promote English. It lists seven specific exceptions, including language teaching, protections under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, national security, public health, the Census, victims' and defendants' rights, and technical terms of art.
- Individuals and courts: The bill would add rules of construction that favor English-language texts when laws are ambiguous and state that ambiguities must not deny rights or state powers. It would also create a private right of action allowing someone harmed by a violation to sue for relief.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
5 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 2 costs, 2 mixed.
English required for federal work
If enacted, the federal government would have to use English for official work. This would cover laws, hearings, regulations, publications, orders, programs, and policies. There would be seven exceptions: language teaching; special education (IDEA); national security, foreign affairs, trade, tourism, or commerce; public health and safety; the Census; rights of crime victims or defendants; and terms of art. People with limited English could see fewer translations for official services. The rule would start 180 days after enactment.
Tougher English test for citizenship
If enacted, the Department of Homeland Security would have to propose one English test within 180 days. The test would check if applicants can read and generally understand the Declaration, the Constitution, and U.S. laws in English. Exceptions would be rare, such as asylum cases. All naturalization ceremonies would be conducted in English.
New right to sue over language
If enacted, people injured by a violation of the official-language rules could sue. They could bring civil actions, including under federal court procedures in title 28, chapter 151. What relief they get would depend on court decisions. This right would begin 180 days after enactment.
Employers could require English at work
If enacted, courts would presume English-language workplace rules are lawful. Public and private employers could more easily require English on the job. If a law’s English text is unclear, courts would resolve it to avoid denying people’s rights and to respect state powers. The rule would start 180 days after enactment.
Federal push to promote English
If enacted, federal officials would have to preserve and promote English. They would encourage more chances for people to learn English. The bill does not set funding or specific programs. The rule would start 180 days after enactment.
Free Policy Watch
You just read the policy. Now see what it costs you.
Pick a topic. PRIA runs your household against live legislation and sends you a free personalized readout.
Pick a topic to get started
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Aderholt
AL • R
Cosponsors
Norman
SC • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]
TN • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Rep. Graves, Sam [R-MO-6]
MO • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Rep. Hamadeh, Abraham J. [R-AZ-8]
AZ • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Rep. Gosar, Paul A. [R-AZ-9]
AZ • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Strong
AL • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Rep. Moore, Barry [R-AL-1]
AL • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Rogers (AL)
AL • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Rep. Palmer, Gary J. [R-AL-6]
AL • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Miller (IL)
IL • R
Sponsored 3/4/2025
Rep. Dunn, Neal P. [R-FL-2]
FL • R
Sponsored 4/7/2025
Jack
GA • R
Sponsored 6/9/2025
Rep. Smith, Adrian [R-NE-3]
NE • R
Sponsored 6/10/2025
Rep. Steube, W. Gregory [R-FL-17]
FL • R
Sponsored 7/7/2025
Rep. McCormick, Richard [R-GA-7]
GA • R
Sponsored 8/26/2025
Loudermilk
GA • R
Sponsored 9/17/2025
Rep. Gill, Brandon [R-TX-26]
TX • R
Sponsored 2/9/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govTake It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Take the PRIA Score to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in