HR3564119th Congress

The Nuclear First-Strike Security Act of 2025

Sponsored By: Representative Rep. Peters, Scott H. [D-CA-50]

Introduced

Summary

Limits presidential use of funds for a U.S. first-use nuclear strike. It bars spending on a first-use nuclear attack unless the President finds the strike is in the United States' best interests and the Secretary of Defense submits a certification to congressional leaders within seven days before the strike, with three narrow exceptions.

Show full summary
  • For the President and the Department of Defense: makes federal funding for a first-use nuclear strike conditional on a presidential determination that the strike is in the United States' best interests.
  • For Congress and oversight: requires the Secretary of Defense to certify the legality and validity of the President's decision to the Speaker, House leaders, and Senate leaders no more than seven days before the strike. Exceptions cover a congressional declaration of war, a response to a nuclear attack, and a launch-on-warning scenario.
  • For allies and military planning: defines who counts as an "ally" (NATO members, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Australia) and defines "first-use nuclear strike," "launch-on-warning scenario," and "nuclear attack" to guide when the restriction applies.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

New guardrails on first-use nuclear strikes

If enacted, this bill would limit spending to carry out a first-use nuclear strike. The President would have to decide it is in the best interests of the United States, and within seven days before any strike the Secretary of Defense would need to certify to the Speaker, the House Majority and Minority Leaders, and the Senate Majority and Minority Leaders that the decision is valid and legal. That certification would not be required if Congress has declared war, if responding to a nuclear attack on the United States or an ally, or in a launch-on-warning scenario. The bill would define who counts as an ally (NATO, Japan, South Korea, Australia) and what counts as a launch-on-warning (U.S. systems detect a missile headed to the United States or an ally) and a nuclear attack (one or more nuclear detonations on U.S. or allied territory). It would define "first-use" as using nuclear weapons when the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have not jointly confirmed to the President that the other country already carried out a nuclear attack on the United States or an ally.

Free Policy Watch

You just read the policy. Now see what it costs you.

Pick a topic. PRIA runs your household against live legislation and sends you a free personalized readout.

Pick a topic to get started

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Rep. Peters, Scott H. [D-CA-50]

CA • D

Cosponsors

  • Rep. Ryan, Patrick [D-NY-18]

    NY • D

    Sponsored 5/21/2025

  • Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]

    PA • D

    Sponsored 5/21/2025

  • Rep. Levin, Mike [D-CA-49]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/4/2025

  • Rep. Foster, Bill [D-IL-11]

    IL • D

    Sponsored 6/23/2025

  • Rep. McDonald Rivet, Kristen [D-MI-8]

    MI • D

    Sponsored 6/26/2025

  • Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]

    NV • D

    Sponsored 7/14/2025

  • Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-14]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 7/14/2025

  • Rep. Pappas, Chris [D-NH-1]

    NH • D

    Sponsored 7/17/2025

  • Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

    IL • D

    Sponsored 8/22/2025

  • Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]

    IL • D

    Sponsored 8/22/2025

  • Rep. Sorensen, Eric [D-IL-17]

    IL • D

    Sponsored 8/29/2025

  • Rep. Bera, Ami [D-CA-6]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 9/4/2025

  • Liccardo

    CA • D

    Sponsored 9/4/2025

  • Rep. Harder, Josh [D-CA-9]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 10/24/2025

  • Rep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7]

    VA • D

    Sponsored 10/24/2025

  • Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10]

    VA • D

    Sponsored 10/24/2025

  • Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 11/7/2025

  • Whitesides

    CA • D

    Sponsored 11/17/2025

  • Riley (NY)

    NY • D

    Sponsored 11/18/2025

  • Mannion

    NY • D

    Sponsored 1/9/2026

  • Rep. Tran, Derek [D-CA-45]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 2/23/2026

  • Rep. Vasquez, Gabe [D-NM-2]

    NM • D

    Sponsored 4/9/2026

  • Lee (NV)

    NV • D

    Sponsored 4/9/2026

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Take the PRIA Score to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in