Sponsored By: Senator Mike Lee
Introduced
Senate-confirmed appointment for the Chief of the Forest Service. This bill would require the President to nominate, with the advice and consent of the Senate, a Chief who has substantial experience and demonstrated competence in forest and natural resources management.
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
If enacted, the President would have to nominate the Chief of the Forest Service and get Senate approval. The nominee would need substantial experience in forest and natural resources management. Any nomination sent to the Senate would be jointly referred to the Senate Agriculture Committee and the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. That joint-referral rule would be added to Senate rules, but the Senate could still change its rules. The President would have to send a nomination within 30 days of enactment, even if an incumbent is serving.
Free Policy Watch
Pick a topic. PRIA runs your household against live legislation and sends you a free personalized readout.
Pick a topic to get started
Mike Lee
UT • R
Cynthia Lummis
WY • R
Sponsored 3/13/2025
John Curtis
UT • R
Sponsored 3/13/2025
Tim Sheehy
MT • R
Sponsored 3/13/2025
John Barrasso
WY • R
Sponsored 3/13/2025
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govSurfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph — ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Appropriations package that would fund Treasury and IRS while imposing rulemaking limits and detailed DC policy constraints, affecting taxpayers, community lenders, and DC residents.
The federal government runs two closely related conservation-workforce pipelines on public lands: the Youth Conservation Corps YCC and the Public Lands Corps PLC. YCC is a summer employment program fo
The Uruguay Round Agreements Act URAA of 1994 19 U.S.C. §§ 3501–3624 implemented U.S. membership in the World Trade Organization WTO and incorporated the Uruguay Round trade agreements — the broadest
The World Trade Center Health Program is a federally funded health benefits program that provides free medical monitoring and treatment to those who were exposed to the toxic dust, debris, and fumes f
Workers' compensation is the United States' primary workplace injury system — a no-fault insurance program where employees who are injured on the job receive medical coverage and partial wage replacem
Take It Personal
Take the PRIA Score to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in
S3752 — SAVE America Act
Would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship and a tangible photo ID to register and vote in federal elections. It would create a nationwide verification system using DHS SAVE, Social Security Administration checks, and state DMV and other databases and would expand removal rules, private lawsuits, and criminal penalties for registration violations. - Voters and registrants: People seeking to register for federal office would need to present listed documents such as a U.S. passport, REAL ID showing citizenship, naturalization certificate, or certified birth records. Those without documents could use a uniform affidavit under penalty of perjury as an alternative. - State and election agencies: Motor vehicle agencies and voter registration offices would have to collect and verify documentary proof and regularly cross-check SAVE, SSA, and state records. Federal departments would be required to provide verification data on request and, where practicable, within 24 hours to support verification. - Voting process and enforcement: In-person voters would need a tangible photo ID and absentee voters would include an ID copy with requests and ballots. The bill would add a mechanism to remove registrants verified as noncitizens and broaden private rights of action and criminal penalties for assisting improper registration.
S587 — Death Tax Repeal Act of 2025
Repeal of the estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes. This bill would eliminate those transfer taxes for decedents dying and GST transfers occurring after enactment and would overhaul the gift tax to raise the lifetime exemption and add a new tiered rate schedule. - Families and heirs: Heirs of people who die after enactment would no longer face the federal estate tax or the generation-skipping transfer tax. - Donors and trusts: The lifetime gift exemption would rise to $10 million, indexed for inflation, and gift tax rates would be rewritten into brackets that range from 18% up to 35% for the largest gifts. Trust transfers would be treated as taxable gifts unless the trust is wholly owned by the donor or the donor's spouse. - Implementation and timing: The changes would apply to gifts made and transfers occurring on or after enactment and include a transition rule that treats the calendar year of enactment as two separate periods for certain tax provisions.
S485 — Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2025
This bill would create a new system centered on congressional approval and budgeting of major federal rules and would bring significant guidance documents and existing major rules into a stricter oversight, planning, and publication regime. - It would require Congress to pass a joint resolution of approval before a "major rule" could take effect, and a "major rule" would include any action with an annual economic effect of $100 million or large effects on families, workers, employment, or competition. - Agencies would have to send Congress and the Comptroller General a full rule package with cost–benefit analyses and related materials, and the Office of Management and Budget Director would set incremental regulatory cost allowances (defaulting to zero) while the Comptroller General must report on major-rule submissions within 15 days. - Major rules would automatically expire after 10 years unless reapproved, and the Director would review at least 10 percent of eligible rules each year; the bill also creates a private right of action to challenge agency compliance and limited judicial review and agency affirmative defenses.
S186 — No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2025
Blocks federal funding for abortions and for health plans that cover abortion. The bill would permanently ban the use of federal funds for abortions or for any health plan paid for in whole or in part with federal money and would bar abortions in federal facilities or by federal employees. - Families and marketplace enrollees would not be able to use premium tax credits or cost‑sharing reductions to buy plans that include abortion. They could purchase a separate abortion-only plan but would receive no federal subsidy for that coverage. - People who receive care in federal facilities and anyone served by federal employees would not get abortions paid for with federal funds. The bill extends funding restrictions to federal trust funds and the District of Columbia. Exceptions are preserved for rape, incest, and life‑threatening conditions. - Employers and insurers would face new rules. Plans that include abortion would be excluded from the small employer health insurance credit. Qualified health plans and marketplace materials would have to prominently disclose whether they cover abortion and any separate surcharge for that coverage.
S6 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
This bill would require health care practitioners to give the same standard of care and immediate hospital admission for infants born alive after an abortion. It would also create mandatory reporting rules and civil and criminal penalties for failures. - Health care practitioners: Would have to provide the same professional care any newborn at the same gestational age would receive and ensure immediate hospital admission. Violations can lead to fines or up to 5 years in prison. - Clinic and hospital staff: Anyone who knows a practitioner failed to meet the care rules must immediately report that failure to state or federal law enforcement. - Mothers: The woman on whom the abortion was performed could not be prosecuted under this law and may sue providers for violations. - Civil remedies: A successful suit can win verifiable damages for injuries, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. - Homicide exposure: Intentionally killing or attempting to kill an infant born alive would be prosecuted as murder.
S5 — Laken Riley Act
This law requires DHS to detain certain non-U.S. nationals charged with burglary, theft, larceny, shoplifting, assault on an officer, or crimes causing death or serious bodily injury. It also creates a new route for states to sue federal officials over immigration detention, parole, removal, inspection, and visa decisions that harm state interests. - Non-U.S. nationals charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admitting to those crimes and who are unlawfully present or lack required admission documents are designated for detainer-based custody. Definitions of burglary, theft, larceny, shoplifting, assault, and serious bodily injury follow the law where the act occurred. - State governments can file for injunctive relief against federal decisions or alleged failures that cause harm to the state or its residents, including financial harm greater than $100. Those suits may seek to block or compel actions on releases, parole limits, visa issuance, asylum inspections, and failures to detain. - DHS must issue detainers and promptly take custody if an eligible individual is not already held by federal, state, or local authorities. The act alters detention provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act to add these conduct-based disqualifications.
