S1092119th CongressWALLET

WIPPES Act

Sponsored By: Senator Jeff Merkley

Passed Senate

Summary

This bill would require mandatory Do Not Flush labeling for many premoistened wipes and similar products. It sets detailed packaging and visibility rules for the symbol and the words "Do Not Flush," assigns enforcement to the Federal Trade Commission, and prevents states from imposing different label rules.

Show full summary
  • Families and consumers: Would make packages show a clear Do Not Flush symbol and the label notice where wipes are dispensed and bans any claim that a covered product is flushable.
  • Manufacturers and brands: Covered entities must follow packaging-specific placement rules and meet visibility standards such as a minimum size of 2% of the principal display panel and high contrast for the symbol and notice.
  • Retailers and bulk sellers: Outer and inner retail packaging must carry the symbol and notice, with limited exemptions for very small or individually wrapped products.
  • Federal enforcement and guidance: The Federal Trade Commission may enforce violations as unfair or deceptive acts under the FTC Act and must issue guidance within 180 days in consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency, the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
  • States: No State or local government may require Do Not Flush labeling that is not identical to the federal requirements.
  • Timing: The rules would apply to a covered entity one year after enactment and would not apply to products packaged or sold before that date.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

3 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Clear Do Not Flush labels on wipes

If enacted, makers and sellers would need clear Do Not Flush labels on covered wipes. Labels would go on the main display and be visible each time a wipe is dispensed. Round canisters could put the notice on a flip lid that covers at least 8% of the lid. Film packs and rigid tubs would follow placement rules for the main and dispensing sides. Each symbol and the words Do Not Flush would be at least 2% of the main panel. Colors would need high contrast of at least 70%, except for embossed flip‑lid markings. Small packs under 3 by 3 inches would need a prominent, visible label. Covered products would not be allowed to claim they are flushable, in words or by hint. These requirements would start one year after enactment.

National wipe-label rules and FTC enforcement

If enacted, breaking these rules would count as an unfair or deceptive act under the FTC Act. The FTC would enforce using its full powers and penalties. The FTC would issue compliance guidance within 180 days, after consulting EPA, FDA, and CPSC. Guidance would not be binding, and cases would need a specific violation of the statute. States and cities would not be allowed to set different Do Not Flush label rules. Enforcement would begin one year after enactment.

Which wipes these rules would cover

If enacted, the bill would define which wipes are covered. It would cover premoistened, nonwoven baby or diapering wipes sold at retail. It would also cover household or personal care wipes with petrochemical fibers that are likely to be flushed. Examples include antibacterial, disinfecting, bathroom and toilet cleaning, makeup removal, feminine and adult hygiene, hand sanitizing, and body cleansing wipes. It would define who is responsible for labels, including makers, suppliers, and retailers that control the package. It would define the Do Not Flush words and symbol and the main display panel based on package shape. These definitions would apply starting one year after enactment.

Free Policy Watch

You just read the policy. Now see what it costs you.

Pick a topic. PRIA runs your household against live legislation and sends you a free personalized readout.

Pick a topic to get started

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Jeff Merkley

OR • D

Cosponsors

  • Susan Collins

    ME • R

    Sponsored 3/24/2025

  • Richard Blumenthal

    CT • D

    Sponsored 3/24/2025

  • Angus King

    ME • I

    Sponsored 3/24/2025

  • Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

    MA • D

    Sponsored 3/24/2025

  • Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA]

    WA • D

    Sponsored 3/24/2025

  • Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/24/2025

  • Ron Wyden

    OR • D

    Sponsored 3/24/2025

  • Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

    NH • D

    Sponsored 3/24/2025

  • Sen. Warren, Elizabeth [D-MA]

    MA • D

    Sponsored 3/27/2025

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov

Live Policy Activity

Live

Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph — ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.

Live · 8h ago15,853Bills1,439Wiki4 signals surfaced
Now TrackingHR8495
Moving· 6 days in stage

Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2027

Rep. Joyce, David P. [R-OH-14] (R-OH)
IntroducedApr 24
Cmte Reported
Passed Origin Chbr
Passed Second Chbr
Resolving Diffs
Enrolled
Became Law
Current StageIntroduced· 6d

Appropriations package that would fund Treasury and IRS while imposing rulemaking limits and detailed DC policy constraints, affecting taxpayers, community lenders, and DC residents.

How These Connect

· reasoned by PRIA's knowledge graph
Graph Connectionextracted100% confidence
Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 20273 U.S.C. § 106 — Assistance and services for the Vice President

vernment, $8,000,000, to remain available until expended. Special Assistance to the President salaries and expenses For necessary expenses to enable the Vice President to provide assistance to the President in connection with specially assigned functions; services as authorized by 5 U.S.C. 3109 and 3 U.S.C. 106, including subsistence expenses as authorized by 3 U.S.C. 106, which shall be expended and accounted for as provided in that section; and hire of passenger motor vehicles, $6,015,000.

Graph Connectionextracted100% confidence
A bill to appoint a Geothermal Ombudsman and establish a Geothermal Permitting Task Force from within the Bureau of Land Management, and for other purposes.30 U.S.C. § 1002 — Lands subject to geothermal leasing

.--The term ``geothermal energy project'' means a project wholly or partially located on public land that uses geothermal energy to generate heat or electricity. (3) Public land.--The term ``public land'' means lands subject to geothermal leasing under section 3 of the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1002). (4) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Interior. (5) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means the Geothermal Permitting Task Force established under subsection (c). (b) Geothermal Ombudsman.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 60 days after the date of ena

Back to Legislation

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Take the PRIA Score to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in