The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (a), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Codification As originally enacted subsec. (a) contained references to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Act
June 25, 1936, substituted “the district court of the United States for the District of Columbia” for “the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia”, and act
June 25, 1948, as amended by act
May 24, 1949, substituted “United States District Court for the District of Columbia” for “district court of the United States for the District of Columbia”. Pub. L. 100–181 struck out reference to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Previously, such reference had been editorially eliminated as superfluous in view of
section 132(a) of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, which provides that “There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district”, and
section 88 of Title 28 which provides that “the District of Columbia constitutes one judicial district”.
2010—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–203, § 929E(a), inserted after second sentence “In any action or proceeding instituted by the Commission under this subchapter in a United States district court for any judicial district, a subpoena issued to compel the attendance of a witness or the production of documents or tangible things (or both) at a hearing or trial may be served at any place within the United States. Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall not apply to a subpoena issued under the preceding sentence.” Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 111–203, § 929P(b)(1), added subsec. (c). 1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–353 inserted “except as provided in
section 77p of this title with respect to covered class actions,” after “Territorial courts,” in first sentence and substituted “Except as provided in
section 77p(c) of this title, no case” for “No case” in penultimate sentence. 1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–181 substituted “United States and” for “United States, the”, struck out “, and the United States District Court for the District of Columbia” after “Territory”, and substituted “
section 1254, 1291, 1292, and 1294 of title 28” for “
section 128 and
240 of the Judicial Code, as amended (U.S.C., title 28, secs. 225 and 347)”. See Codification note above. 1970—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 91–452 struck out subsec. (c) which related to immunity from prosecution of any individual compelled to testify or produce evidence, documentary or otherwise, after claiming his privilege against self-incrimination. 1954—Subsec. (a). Act Aug. 10, 1954, inserted “offer or” before “sale” in second sentence.
of 2010 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see
section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an
of 1998 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 105–353 not to affect or apply to any action commenced before and pending on Nov. 3, 1998, see
section 101(c) of Pub. L. 105–353, set out as a note under
section 77p of this title.
of 1970 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 91–452 effective on sixtieth day following Oct. 15, 1970, see
section 260 of Pub. L. 91–452, set out as an
note under
section 6001 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
of 1954 AmendmentAmendment by act Aug. 10, 1954, effective 60 days after Aug. 10, 1954, see note under
section 77b of this title.
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–452 not to affect any immunity to which any individual is entitled under this section by reason of any testimony given before the sixtieth day following Oct. 15, 1970, see
section 260 of Pub. L. 91–452, set out as an
note under
section 6001 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§ 1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under
section 78d of this title.