§7430 — Title 26 Internal Revenue Code | U.S. Code

Summary

If you win a tax dispute with the United States in an IRS appeal or in court, you may be able to get paid back for reasonable IRS administrative costs and reasonable court litigation costs. To get court costs, you must first use all IRS administrative remedies. Costs must only cover amounts charged against the United States. You cannot get costs for parts of the case you unreasonably delayed. To ask the IRS for administrative costs, you must file an application within 91 days after the IRS mails its final decision. “Reasonable litigation costs” include court fees, expert witness expenses (not more than the highest rate paid by the United States), necessary studies or tests, and attorney fees (no more than $125 per hour unless a court finds a special reason to allow more). “Reasonable administrative costs” include IRS fees and similar expenses. People authorized to practice before the Tax Court or the IRS count like lawyers for fee rules, and a court may award higher fees if someone worked for little or no pay. A “prevailing party” is a party that mostly wins the amount in dispute or the key issue and that meets the net-worth and other limits in 28 U.S.C. 2412. The Government need not pay if its position was substantially justified; if the IRS ignored its published guidance in the administrative stage, its position is presumed not justified (this can be rebutted). Administrative awards are paid from federal funds, and Tax Court awards are paid like district court awards. The IRS’s denial of administrative costs can be taken to the Tax Court within 91 days. A taxpayer may make a written “qualified offer” during the qualified offer period (which begins when the first deficiency letter that allows an IRS appeal is sent and ends 30 days before the case is first set for trial); such an offer must remain open until it is rejected, the trial starts, or the 90th day after it was made. If the final tax the taxpayer owes is no more than the amount in that offer, the taxpayer may be treated as the prevailing party and recover costs only from the date of the offer. Some settlements and cases where tax amount is not at issue do not qualify.

Title 26, §7430

Internal Revenue Code — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)In any administrative or court proceeding which is brought by or against the United States in connection with the determination, collection, or refund of any tax, interest, or penalty under this title, the prevailing party may be awarded a judgment or a settlement for—

(1)reasonable administrative costs incurred in connection with such administrative proceeding within the Internal Revenue Service, and

(2)reasonable litigation costs incurred in connection with such court proceeding.

(b)(1)A judgment for reasonable litigation costs shall not be awarded under subsection (a) in any court proceeding unless the court determines that the prevailing party has exhausted the administrative remedies available to such party within the Internal Revenue Service. Any failure to agree to an extension of the time for the assessment of any tax shall not be taken into account for purposes of determining whether the prevailing party meets the requirements of the preceding sentence.

(2)An award under subsection (a) shall be made only for reasonable litigation and administrative costs which are allocable to the United States and not to any other party.

(3)No award for reasonable litigation and administrative costs may be made under subsection (a) with respect to any portion of the administrative or court proceeding during which the prevailing party has unreasonably protracted such proceeding.

(4)An award may be made under subsection (a) by the Internal Revenue Service for reasonable administrative costs only if the prevailing party files an application with the Internal Revenue Service for such costs before the 91st day after the date on which the final decision of the Internal Revenue Service as to the determination of the tax, interest, or penalty is mailed to such party.

(c)For purposes of this section—

(1)The term “reasonable litigation costs” includes—

(A)reasonable court costs, and

(B)based upon prevailing market rates for the kind or quality of services furnished—

(i)the reasonable expenses of expert witnesses in connection with a court proceeding, except that no expert witness shall be compensated at a rate in excess of the highest rate of compensation for expert witnesses paid by the United States,

(ii)the reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, or project which is found by the court to be necessary for the preparation of the party’s case, and

(iii)reasonable fees paid or incurred for the services of attorneys in connection with the court proceeding, except that such fees shall not be in excess of $125 per hour unless the court determines that a special factor, such as the limited availability of qualified attorneys for such proceeding, the difficulty of the issues presented in the case, or the local availability of tax expertise, justifies a higher rate.

(2)The term “reasonable administrative costs” means—

(A)any administrative fees or similar charges imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, and

(B)expenses, costs, and fees described in paragraph (1)(B), except that any determination made by the court under clause (ii) or (iii) thereof shall be made by the Internal Revenue Service in cases where the determination under paragraph (4)(C) of the awarding of reasonable administrative costs is made by the Internal Revenue Service.

(3)(A)For purposes of paragraphs (1) and (2), fees for the services of an individual (whether or not an attorney) who is authorized to practice before the Tax Court or before the Internal Revenue Service shall be treated as fees for the services of an attorney.

(B)The court may award reasonable attorneys’ fees under subsection (a) in excess of the attorneys’ fees paid or incurred if such fees are less than the reasonable attorneys’ fees because an individual is representing the prevailing party for no fee or for a fee which (taking into account all the facts and circumstances) is no more than a nominal fee. This subparagraph shall apply only if such award is paid to such individual or such individual’s employer.

(4)(A)The term “prevailing party” means any party in any proceeding to which subsection (a) applies (other than the United States or any creditor of the taxpayer involved)—

(i)which—

(I)has substantially prevailed with respect to the amount in controversy, or

(II)has substantially prevailed with respect to the most significant issue or set of issues presented, and

(ii)which meets the requirements of the 1st sentence of section 2412(d)(1)(B) of title 28, United States Code (as in effect on October 22, 1986) except to the extent differing procedures are established by rule of court and meets the requirements of section 2412(d)(2)(B) of such title 28 (as so in effect).

(B)(i)A party shall not be treated as the prevailing party in a proceeding to which subsection (a) applies if the United States establishes that the position of the United States in the proceeding was substantially justified.

(ii)For purposes of clause (i), the position of the United States shall be presumed not to be substantially justified if the Internal Revenue Service did not follow its applicable published guidance in the administrative proceeding. Such presumption may be rebutted.

(iii)In determining for purposes of clause (i) whether the position of the United States was substantially justified, the court shall take into account whether the United States has lost in courts of appeal for other circuits on substantially similar issues.

(iv)For purposes of clause (ii), the term “applicable published guidance” means—

(I)regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, information releases, notices, and announcements, and

(II)any of the following which are issued to the taxpayer: private letter rulings, technical advice memoranda, and determination letters.

(C)Any determination under this paragraph as to whether a party is a prevailing party shall be made by agreement of the parties or—

(i)in the case where the final determination with respect to the tax, interest, or penalty is made at the administrative level, by the Internal Revenue Service, or

(ii)in the case where such final determination is made by a court, the court.

(D)In applying the requirements of section 2412(d)(2)(B) of title 28, United States Code, for purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii) of this paragraph—

(i)the net worth limitation in clause (i) of such section shall apply to—

(I)an estate but shall be determined as of the date of the decedent’s death, and

(II)a trust but shall be determined as of the last day of the taxable year involved in the proceeding, and

(ii)individuals filing a joint return shall be treated as separate individuals for purposes of clause (i) of such section.

(E)(i)A party to a court proceeding meeting the requirements of subparagraph (A)(ii) shall be treated as the prevailing party if the liability of the taxpayer pursuant to the judgment in the proceeding (determined without regard to interest) is equal to or less than the liability of the taxpayer which would have been so determined if the United States had accepted a qualified offer of the party under subsection (g).

(ii)This subparagraph shall not apply to—

(I)any judgment issued pursuant to a settlement; or

(II)any proceeding in which the amount of tax liability is not in issue, including any declaratory judgment proceeding, any proceeding to enforce or quash any summons issued pursuant to this title, and any action to restrain disclosure under section 6110(f).

(iii)If this subparagraph applies to any court proceeding—

(I)the determination under clause (i) shall be made by reference to the last qualified offer made with respect to the tax liability at issue in the proceeding; and

(II)reasonable administrative and litigation costs shall only include costs incurred on and after the date of such offer.

(iv)This subparagraph shall not apply to a party which is a prevailing party under any other provision of this paragraph.

(5)The term “administrative proceeding” means any procedure or other action before the Internal Revenue Service.

(6)The term “court proceeding” means any civil action brought in a court of the United States (including the Tax Court and the United States Court of Federal Claims).

(7)The term “position of the United States” means—

(A)the position taken by the United States in a judicial proceeding to which subsection (a) applies, and

(B)the position taken in an administrative proceeding to which subsection (a) applies as of the earlier of—

(i)the date of the receipt by the taxpayer of the notice of the decision of the Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals, or

(ii)the date of the notice of deficiency.

(d)(1)An award for reasonable administrative costs shall be payable out of funds appropriated under section 1304 of title 31, United States Code.

(2)An award for reasonable litigation costs shall be payable in the case of the Tax Court in the same manner as such an award by a district court.

(e)For purposes of this section, in the case of—

(1)multiple actions which could have been joined or consolidated, or

(2)a case or cases involving a return or returns of the same taxpayer (including joint returns of married individuals) which could have been joined in a single court proceeding in the same court,

(f)(1)An order granting or denying (in whole or in part) an award for reasonable litigation or administrative costs under subsection (a) in a court proceeding, may be incorporated as a part of the decision or judgment in the court proceeding and shall be subject to appeal in the same manner as the decision or judgment.

(2)A decision granting or denying (in whole or in part) an award for reasonable administrative costs under subsection (a) by the Internal Revenue Service shall be subject to the filing of a petition for review with the Tax Court under rules similar to the rules under section 7463 (without regard to the amount in dispute). If the Secretary sends by certified or registered mail a notice of such decision to the petitioner, no proceeding in the Tax Court may be initiated under this paragraph unless such petition is filed before the 91st day after the date of such mailing.

(3)An order of the Tax Court disposing of a petition under paragraph (2) shall be reviewable in the same manner as a decision of the Tax Court, but only with respect to the matters determined in such order.

(g)For purposes of subsection (c)(4)—

(1)The term “qualified offer” means a written offer which—

(A)is made by the taxpayer to the United States during the qualified offer period;

(B)specifies the offered amount of the taxpayer’s liability (determined without regard to interest);

(C)is designated at the time it is made as a qualified offer for purposes of this section; and

(D)remains open during the period beginning on the date it is made and ending on the earliest of the date the offer is rejected, the date the trial begins, or the 90th day after the date the offer is made.

(2)For purposes of this subsection, the term “qualified offer period” means the period—

(A)beginning on the date on which the first letter of proposed deficiency which allows the taxpayer an opportunity for administrative review in the Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals is sent, and

(B)ending on the date which is 30 days before the date the case is first set for trial.

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Inflation Adjusted Items for Certain YearsFor inflation adjustment of certain items in this section, see Revenue Procedures listed in a table under section 1 of this title.

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions

A prior section 7430 was renumbered section 7437 of this title.

Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–25 substituted “Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals” for “Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals” wherever appearing. 2018—Subsec. (c)(6). Pub. L. 115–141 substituted “United States Court of Federal Claims” for “United States Claims Court”. 2017—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 115–97 substituted “for ‘calendar year 2016’ in subparagraph (A)(ii)” for “for ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph (B)” in concluding provisions. 2000—Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(7) [title III, § 319(25)(A)], substituted “Attorneys’ ” for “Attorneys” in heading. Subsec. (c)(3)(B). Pub. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(7) [title III, § 319(25)(B)], substituted “attorneys’ fees” for “attorneys fees” wherever appearing. 1998—Subsec. (b)(4), (5). Pub. L. 105–206, § 6012(h), redesignated par. (5) as (4). Subsec. (c)(1)(B)(iii). Pub. L. 105–206, § 3101(a), substituted “$125” for “$110” and inserted “the difficulty of the issues presented in the case, or the local availability of tax expertise,” before “justifies a higher rate”. Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 105–206, § 3101(b), added concluding provisions and struck out former concluding provisions which read as follows: “Such term shall only include costs incurred on or after the earlier of (i) the date of the receipt by the taxpayer of the notice of the decision of the Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals, or (ii) the date of the notice of deficiency.” Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 105–206, § 3101(c), substituted “attorneys” for “attorney’s” in heading and amended text of par. (3) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “For purposes of paragraphs (1) and (2), fees for the services of an individual (whether or not an attorney) who is authorized to practice before the Tax Court or before the Internal Revenue Service shall be treated as fees for the services of an attorney.” Subsec. (c)(4)(B)(iii), (iv). Pub. L. 105–206, § 3101(d), added cl. (iii) and redesignated former cl. (iii) as (iv). Subsec. (c)(4)(D). Pub. L. 105–206, § 6014(e), substituted “subparagraph (A)(ii)” for “subparagraph (A)(iii)” in introductory provisions. Subsec. (c)(4)(E). Pub. L. 105–206, § 3101(e)(1), added subpar. (E). Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 105–206, § 3101(e)(2), added subsec. (g). 1997—Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 105–34, § 1285(b), added par. (5). Subsec. (c)(4)(D). Pub. L. 105–34, § 1453(a), added subpar. (D). Subsec. (f)(2). Pub. L. 105–34, § 1285(c), substituted “the filing of a petition for review with” for “appeal to” and inserted at end “If the Secretary sends by certified or registered mail a notice of such decision to the petitioner, no proceeding in the Tax Court may be initiated under this paragraph unless such petition is filed before the 91st day after the date of such mailing.” Subsec. (f)(3). Pub. L. 105–34, § 1285(a), added par. (3). 1996—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 104–168, § 703(a), inserted at end “Any failure to agree to an extension of the time for the assessment of any tax shall not be taken into account for purposes of determining whether the prevailing party meets the requirements of the preceding sentence.” Subsec. (b)(3), (4). Pub. L. 104–168, § 704(a), redesignated par. (4) as (3) and struck out former par. (3) which read as follows: “(3) Exclusion of declaratory judgment proceedings.— “(A) In general.—No award for reasonable litigation costs may be made under subsection (a) with respect to any declaratory judgment proceeding. “(B) Exception for section 501(c)(3) determination revocation proceedings.—Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to any proceeding which involves the revocation of a determination that the organization is described in section 501(c)(3).” Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 104–168, § 702(a)(3), inserted closing provisions “In the case of any calendar year beginning after 1996, the dollar amount referred to in clause (iii) shall be increased by an amount equal to such dollar amount multiplied by the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for such calendar year, by substituting ‘calendar year 1995’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. If any dollar amount after being increased under the preceding sentence is not a multiple of $10, such dollar amount shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $10.” Subsec. (c)(1)(B)(iii). Pub. L. 104–168, § 702(a)(1), (2), substituted “$110” for “$75” and struck out “an increase in the cost of living or” before “a special factor,”. Subsec. (c)(2)(B). Pub. L. 104–168, § 701(c)(1), substituted “paragraph (4)(C)” for “paragraph (4)(B)”. Subsec. (c)(4)(A). Pub. L. 104–168, § 701(a), redesignated cls. (ii) and (iii) as (i) and (ii), respectively, and struck out former cl. (i) which read as follows: “which establishes that the position of the United States in the proceeding was not substantially justified,”. Subsec. (c)(4)(B). Pub. L. 104–168, § 701(b), added subpar. (B). Former subpar. (B) redesignated (C). Subsec. (c)(4)(C). Pub. L. 104–168, § 701(c)(2), substituted “Any determination under this paragraph” for “Any determination under subparagraph (A)”. Pub. L. 104–168, § 701(b), redesignated subpar. (B) as (C). 1988—Pub. L. 100–647, § 6239(a), substituted “costs” for “court costs” in section catchline and amended text generally, revising and restating provisions so as to include costs and fees in administrative proceedings. Subsec. (c)(2)(A)(iii). Pub. L. 100–647, § 1015(i), amended cl. (iii) generally. Prior to amendment, cl. (iii) read as follows: “meets the requirements of section 504(b)(1)(B) of title 5, United States Code (as in effect on the date of the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and applied by taking into account the commencement of the proceeding described in subsection (a) in lieu of the initiation of the adjudication referred to in such section).” 1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–514, § 1551(f), inserted “(payable in the case of the Tax Court in the same manner as such an award by a district court)” in concluding provisions. Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–514, § 1551(a), (b), redesignated pars. (2) to (4) as (1) to (3), respectively, added par. (4), and struck out former par. (1), maximum dollar amount, which read as follows: “The amount of reasonable litigation costs which may be awarded under subsection (a) with respect to any prevailing party in any civil proceeding shall not exceed $25,000.” Subsec. (c)(1)(A). Pub. L. 99–514, § 1551(c), amended subpar. (A) generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (A) read as follows: “The term ‘reasonable litigation costs’ includes— “(i) reasonable court costs, “(ii) the reasonable expenses of expert witnesses in connection with the civil proceeding, “(iii) the reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, or project which is found by the court to be necessary for the preparation of the party’s case, and “(iv) reasonable fees paid or incurred for the services of attorneys in connection with the civil proceeding.” Subsec. (c)(2)(A). Pub. L. 99–514, § 1551(d), substituted “was not substantially justified” for “was unreasonable” in cl. (i), and added cl. (iii). Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 99–514, § 1551(e), added par. (4). Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 99–514, § 1551(g), struck out subsec. (f), termination, which read as follows: “This section shall not apply to any proceeding commenced after December 31, 1985.” 1984—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 98–369 inserted reference to United States Claims Court.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

July 30, 1996, see section 701(d) of Pub. L. 104–168, set out as a note under section 6404 of this title. Pub. L. 104–168, title VII, § 702(b),

July 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 1464, provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply in the case of proceedings commenced after the date of the enactment of this Act [

July 30, 1996].” Pub. L. 104–168, title VII, § 703(b),

July 30, 1996].” Pub. L. 104–168, title VII, § 704(b),

Summary

Title 26, §7430

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions

Amendments

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

Effective Date

Amendments

Effective Date

Amendments

Effective Date

Effective Date

Amendments

Effective Date

Amendments

Amendments

Effective Date

Amendments

Amendments

Effective Date

Effective Date

Amendments

Amendments

Citations & Metadata