Title 28Judiciary and Judicial ProcedureRelease 119-73

§2261 Prisoners in State custody subject to capital sentence; appointment of counsel; requirement of rule of court or statute; procedures for appointment

Title 28 › Part PART VI— - PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS › Chapter CHAPTER 154— - SPECIAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEDURES IN CAPITAL CASES › § 2261

Last updated Apr 6, 2026|Official source

Summary

Applies to federal cases filed by state prisoners who face the death penalty, but only when two things happen. First, the U.S. Attorney General must say the state has a system to provide lawyers for post-conviction review. Second, the prisoner must have had a lawyer appointed under that system, must have validly given up a lawyer, must have hired a lawyer, or must have been found able to pay for one. The state system must offer a lawyer to every death-row prisoner. A court must either appoint a lawyer if the prisoner cannot afford one or cannot decide, find after a hearing that the prisoner knowingly refused a lawyer, or deny appointment if the prisoner can pay. A post-conviction lawyer cannot be the trial lawyer unless both agree. Poor performance by a post-conviction lawyer alone does not win federal relief, but the court can replace counsel at any time.

Full Legal Text

Title 28, §2261

Judiciary and Judicial Procedure — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)This chapter shall apply to cases arising under section 2254 brought by prisoners in State custody who are subject to a capital sentence. It shall apply only if the provisions of subsections (b) and (c) are satisfied.
(b)This chapter is applicable if—
(1)the Attorney General of the United States certifies that a State has established a mechanism for providing counsel in postconviction proceedings as provided in section 2265; and
(2)counsel was appointed pursuant to that mechanism, petitioner validly waived counsel, petitioner retained counsel, or petitioner was found not to be indigent.
(c)Any mechanism for the appointment, compensation, and reimbursement of counsel as provided in subsection (b) must offer counsel to all State prisoners under capital sentence and must provide for the entry of an order by a court of record—
(1)appointing one or more counsels to represent the prisoner upon a finding that the prisoner is indigent and accepted the offer or is unable competently to decide whether to accept or reject the offer;
(2)finding, after a hearing if necessary, that the prisoner rejected the offer of counsel and made the decision with an understanding of its legal consequences; or
(3)denying the appointment of counsel upon a finding that the prisoner is not indigent.
(d)No counsel appointed pursuant to subsections (b) and (c) to represent a State prisoner under capital sentence shall have previously represented the prisoner at trial in the case for which the appointment is made unless the prisoner and counsel expressly request continued representation.
(e)The ineffectiveness or incompetence of counsel during State or Federal post-conviction proceedings in a capital case shall not be a ground for relief in a proceeding arising under section 2254. This limitation shall not preclude the appointment of different counsel, on the court’s own motion or at the request of the prisoner, at any phase of State or Federal post-conviction proceedings on the basis of the ineffectiveness or incompetence of counsel in such proceedings.

Legislative History

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

Amendments

2006—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–177, § 507(a), added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: “This chapter is applicable if a State establishes by statute, rule of its court of last resort, or by another agency authorized by State law, a mechanism for the appointment, compensation, and payment of reasonable litigation expenses of competent counsel in State post-conviction proceedings brought by indigent prisoners whose capital convictions and sentences have been upheld on direct appeal to the court of last resort in the State or have otherwise become final for State law purposes. The rule of court or statute must provide standards of competency for the appointment of such counsel.” Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 109–177, § 507(b), struck out “or on direct appeal” after “at trial”.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

of 2006 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 109–177 applicable to cases pending on or after Mar. 9, 2006, with special rule for certain cases pending on that date, see section 507(d) of Pub. L. 109–177, set out as a note under section 2251 of this title.

Effective Date

Pub. L. 104–132, title I, § 107(c), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1226, provided that: “Chapter 154 of title 28, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)) shall apply to cases pending on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 1996].”

Reference

Citations & Metadata

Citation

28 U.S.C. § 2261

Title 28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure

Last Updated

Apr 6, 2026

Release point: 119-73