Title 35PatentsRelease 119-73

§311 Inter partes review

Title 35 › Part PART III— - PATENTS AND PROTECTION OF PATENT RIGHTS › Chapter CHAPTER 31— - INTER PARTES REVIEW › § 311

Last updated Apr 6, 2026|Official source

Summary

Someone who does not own a patent can ask the Patent Office to start an inter partes review to challenge that patent. The Patent Office Director must set filing fees. The fees must be reasonable and based on the total cost of the review. A challenger may ask to cancel one or more patent claims only by using the kinds of arguments in section 102 or section 103, and only based on prior art that is patents or printed publications. The petition must be filed after the later of two dates: 9 months after the patent was granted, or, if a post‑grant review was started under chapter 32, after that post‑grant review ends.

Full Legal Text

Title 35, §311

Patents — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)Subject to the provisions of this chapter, a person who is not the owner of a patent may file with the Office a petition to institute an inter partes review of the patent. The Director shall establish, by regulation, fees to be paid by the person requesting the review, in such amounts as the Director determines to be reasonable, considering the aggregate costs of the review.
(b)A petitioner in an inter partes review may request to cancel as unpatentable 1 or more claims of a patent only on a ground that could be raised under section 102 or 103 and only on the basis of prior art consisting of patents or printed publications.
(c)A petition for inter partes review shall be filed after the later of either—
(1)the date that is 9 months after the grant of a patent; or
(2)if a post-grant review is instituted under chapter 32, the date of the termination of such post-grant review.

Legislative History

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

Amendments

2013—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 112–274 struck out “or issuance of a reissue of a patent” after “grant of a patent”. 2011—Pub. L. 112–29 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to request for inter partes reexamination. 2002—Pub. L. 107–273, § 13202(c)(1), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113, which enacted this section. Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–273, § 13202(a)(1)(A), substituted “third-party requester” for “person”. Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–273, § 13202(a)(1)(B), substituted “The” for “Unless the requesting person is the owner of the patent, the”.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

of 2013 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 112–274 effective Jan. 14, 2013, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after such date, see section 1(n) of Pub. L. 112–274, set out as a note under section 5 of this title.

Effective Date

of 2011 Amendment Pub. L. 112–29, § 6(c)(2), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 304, provided that: “(A) In general.—The

Amendments

made by subsection (a) [enacting section 319 of this title and amending this section and sections 312 to 318 of this title] shall take effect upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011] and shall apply to any patent issued before, on, or after that

Effective Date

. “(B) Graduated implementation.—The Director [Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office] may impose a limit on the number of inter partes reviews that may be instituted under chapter 31 of title 35, United States Code, during each of the first 4 1-year periods in which the

Amendments

made by subsection (a) are in effect, if such number in each year equals or exceeds the number of inter partes reexaminations that are ordered under chapter 31 of title 35, United States Code, in the last fiscal year ending before the

Effective Date

of the

Amendments

made by subsection (a).”

Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 29, 1999, and applicable to any patent issuing from an original application filed in the United States on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4608(a)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as an

Effective Date

of 1999 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.

Regulations

Pub. L. 112–29, § 6(c)(1), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 304, provided that: “The Director [Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office] shall, not later than the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011], issue

Regulations

to carry out chapter 31 of title 35, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a) of this section.” Applicability of Filing Deadline Pub. L. 112–274, § 1(d)(1), Jan. 14, 2013, 126 Stat. 2456, provided that: “section 311(c) of title 35, United States Code, shall not apply to a petition to institute an inter partes review of a patent that is not a patent described in section 3(n)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act [Pub. L. 112–29] (35 U.S.C. 100 note).” Report to Congress Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, subtitle F, § 4606], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–571, required the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to submit to Congress a report on possible inequities of certain inter partes reexamination proceedings no later than 5 years after Nov. 29, 1999.

Reference

Citations & Metadata

Citation

35 U.S.C. § 311

Title 35Patents

Last Updated

Apr 6, 2026

Release point: 119-73