Title 49TransportationRelease 119-73

§10701 Standards for rates, classifications, through routes, rules, and practices

Title 49 › Subtitle SUBTITLE IV— - INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION › Part PART A— - RAIL › Chapter CHAPTER 107— - RATES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— - GENERAL AUTHORITY › § 10701

Last updated Apr 6, 2026|Official source

Summary

Rail carriers must charge fair through-route rates and split joint rates in a way that does not unfairly hurt a participating carrier. A carrier may not charge unfair rates or unfairly steer traffic away from a connecting carrier when the shipper hasn’t picked the route. Carriers can set any rate unless another rule bans it, but if the Board finds the carrier has market dominance under section 10707, that rate must be fair. The Board will weigh traffic that doesn’t add to long-term business value, traffic that barely covers fixed costs, and the mix of commodities, and must keep at least one faster, simpler way to decide if a challenged rate is fair when a full cost study is too expensive.

Full Legal Text

Title 49, §10701

Transportation — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)A through route established by a rail carrier must be reasonable. Divisions of joint rates by rail carriers must be made without unreasonable discrimination against a participating carrier and must be reasonable.
(b)A rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part may not discriminate in its rates against a connecting line of another rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part or unreasonably discriminate against that line in the distribution of traffic that is not routed specifically by the shipper.
(c)Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section and unless a rate is prohibited by a provision of this part, a rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part may establish any rate for transportation or other service provided by the rail carrier.
(d)(1)If the Board determines, under section 10707 of this title, that a rail carrier has market dominance over the transportation to which a particular rate applies, the rate established by such carrier for such transportation must be reasonable.
(2)In determining whether a rate established by a rail carrier is reasonable for purposes of this section, the Board shall give due consideration to—
(A)the amount of traffic which is transported at revenues which do not contribute to going concern value and the efforts made to minimize such traffic;
(B)the amount of traffic which contributes only marginally to fixed costs and the extent to which, if any, rates on such traffic can be changed to maximize the revenues from such traffic; and
(C)the carrier’s mix of rail traffic to determine whether one commodity is paying an unreasonable share of the carrier’s overall revenues,
(3)The Board shall maintain 1 or more simplified and expedited methods for determining the reasonableness of challenged rates in those cases in which a full stand-alone cost presentation is too costly, given the value of the case.

Legislative History

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions

Prior section 10701 and 10701a were omitted in the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, § 102(a). section 10701, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1371; Pub. L. 96–296, § 13(a),
July 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 803; Pub. L. 96–448, title II, § 201(b)(1), (2), Oct. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 1899, 1900; Pub. L. 97–261, § 9(a), Sept. 20, 1982, 96 Stat. 1109; Pub. L. 103–180, § 2(a), (b), (g), Dec. 3, 1993, 107 Stat. 2044, 2047, 2049, related to standards for rates, classifications, through routes, rules, and practices. See section 10701, 13701, 13709, and 15501 of this title. section 10701a, added Pub. L. 96–448, title II, § 201(a), Oct. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 1898; amended Pub. L. 103–272, § 4(j)(19),
July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1369, related to standards for rates for rail carriers. See section 10701 of this title.

Amendments

2015—Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 114–110 amended par. (3) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “The Board shall, within one year after
January 1, 1996, complete the pending Interstate Commerce Commission non-coal rate guidelines proceeding to establish a simplified and expedited method for determining the reasonableness of challenged rail rates in those cases in which a full stand-alone cost presentation is too costly, given the value of the case.” 1996—Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 104–287 substituted “
January 1, 1996” for “the

Effective Date

of this paragraph”.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title. Abolition of Interstate Commerce Commission Interstate Commerce Commission abolished by section 101 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.

Reference

Citations & Metadata

Citation

49 U.S.C. § 10701

Title 49Transportation

Last Updated

Apr 6, 2026

Release point: 119-73