Government Finally Notices Contractors Might Have Conflicts of Interest
Published Date: 1/15/2025
Proposed Rule
Summary
The Department of Defense, GSA, and NASA want to update rules to stop companies from having conflicts of interest when working on government contracts. These changes will help make sure contractors play fair and don’t get an unfair advantage. If you’re involved in federal contracts, get ready to follow new guidelines and share your thoughts by March 17, 2025.
Analyzed Economic Effects
7 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 6 costs, 1 mixed.
Potential Significant Impact on Small Entities
The agencies state that the proposed rule may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, because it applies to acquisitions exceeding the SAT and to commercial services. The rule will require disclosures, mitigation plans, and updates to agency procedures that affect small contractors.
New Offeror OCI Disclosure Duty
If you bid on federal contracts (solicitations exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and many commercial services), you must now include an OCI disclosure with your proposal under FAR 52.203-XX. The disclosure must list relevant OCI information (including active limitations on future contracting and client/industry relationships), state professional standards or procedures you follow, confirm you have disclosed all relevant facts, explain how you will address any OCI (for example, a mitigation plan or limitation on future contracting), and update disclosures when facts change.
Postaward OCI Disclosure Requirement
If you win a federal contract that may involve organizational conflicts of interest, FAR 52.203-DD will require you to promptly disclose any new or newly discovered OCI during contract performance. The rule warns that some newly reported OCIs may lead to contract termination, and the clause must be flowed down to subcontracts exceeding the SAT when work may create an OCI.
Mitigation Plans Must Be Incorporated
When an OCI can be handled by an acceptable mitigation plan, FAR 52.203-MM will require the contractor to submit the mitigation plan before award and have that plan incorporated into the contract. The clause covers changes to the plan and consequences for noncompliance, and must flow down to subcontracts exceeding the SAT where work is covered by the mitigation plan.
Limits on Future Contracting Can Be Imposed
Contracting officers may address some OCIs by imposing a FAR 52.203-LL limitation on future contracting that precludes the contractor (or affiliates) from entering certain future contracts for a specified duration or until a specific event. The contracting officer must fill in the nature and duration of the limitation and ensure the duration is sufficient to neutralize the OCI but no longer than necessary; the clause flows down to subcontracts exceeding the SAT.
Representations on Unequal Access to Information
FAR 52.203-AA will require offerors to state before submitting an offer whether they or affiliates had unequal access to information that could give an unfair advantage, describe steps they propose to resolve it, and represent that agreed mitigation measures were implemented. Offerors must also confirm that any firewall used was not breached or check a box and explain if it was not implemented or breached.
Expanded and Clarified OCI Definitions
The FAR definition of organizational conflicts of interest is revised to explicitly include 'unequal access to information,' 'impaired objectivity,' and 'biased ground rules' and adds definitions for affiliate/entity, firewall, impaired objectivity, biased ground rules, and unequal access to information. The change aims to clarify when an OCI exists and to give examples.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-11942 — Receipt of Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities-February 2026
The EPA just announced new requests to change rules about pesticide leftovers on foods like fruits and veggies. Farmers, food makers, and shoppers should know these changes could affect what’s allowed on their produce. You’ve got until July 15, 2026, to share your thoughts before any decisions are made—so don’t miss out!
2026-12006 — Whistleblower Award Determination
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is updating its whistleblower award rules to make the process faster, clearer, and fairer for people who report violations. These changes, inspired by similar SEC rules, aim to boost whistleblower confidence and improve how claims are handled. Comments on the proposal are open until July 15, 2026, so now’s the time to weigh in!
2026-11971 — Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Distribution Transformers
The Department of Energy is checking how new energy-saving rules for distribution transformers, set to start in 2029, might affect U.S. factories and the supply of important materials. They want to make sure these rules don’t cause unfair costs or delays, especially since transformers are key for national security. If you have ideas or info, you can share them by July 15, 2026.
2026-11994 — Request for Information; Comprehensive Review of the Essential Health Benefits Framework and Typical Employer Plan Standard
CMS wants your thoughts on the Essential Health Benefits (EHB) rules that decide what health care must be covered by insurance plans. This review affects people buying health insurance and employers offering plans, aiming to make sure benefits match typical employer plans and keep costs fair. Comments are open until July 15, 2026, and could lead to changes that impact what’s covered and how much you pay.
2026-11957 — Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace; Chicago/Rockford, IL
The FAA wants to update the airspace rules around Chicago/Rockford, IL to keep flights safe and smooth. This affects pilots flying under instrument rules and helps the airport follow the latest safety standards. If you have thoughts, speak up by July 30, 2026—no costs or delays expected from these changes.
2026-11946 — Revocation of Class E Airspace; Lake Geneva, WI
The FAA is planning to remove the Class E airspace around Lake Geneva, Wisconsin, because the local airport has closed and its instrument flight procedures were canceled. This change affects pilots flying in that area, making the airspace rules simpler. If you want to share your thoughts, you have until July 30, 2026, to comment—no costs or fees involved!
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2024-31420 — Safety Zone; Cable Laying Corridor, Atlantic Ocean, Virginia Beach, Virginia
The Coast Guard wants to create a temporary safety zone along a 12-mile stretch off Virginia Beach where a cable-laying barge will be working. Boats and people can’t enter this moving zone unless they get special permission, keeping everyone safe from hazards. Comments on this plan are open until January 29, 2025, so locals and mariners can share their thoughts before it kicks in.
Next: 2024-31626 — Air Plan Approval; Kansas; Annual Emission Inventory and Fees
The EPA is proposing to approve Kansas’s updated rules for tracking pollution and charging fees to keep their air permit program running smoothly. These changes add a new fee category and update existing fees, making sure Kansas stays in sync with federal rules without affecting air quality. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until February 14, 2025, to speak up!