SEC extends rule letting money funds pause payouts during crises
Published Date: 3/3/2025
Notice
Summary
The SEC is asking to keep Rule 22e-3, which lets money market funds pause redemptions during a board-approved liquidation to protect investors. This rule affects money market funds and helps them manage tough times without rushing sales. No new costs or deadlines are added, but the rule’s extension keeps things smooth and safe for fund shareholders.
Analyzed Economic Effects
4 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
Funds Can Pause Redemptions to Liquidate
If you own shares in a money market fund, Rule 22e-3 lets the fund suspend redemptions and postpone payment of proceeds while it undergoes a board-approved liquidation. This is an exemption from section 22(e), which otherwise limits postponing payment or suspending redemption rights to seven days.
Clear Eligibility Tests for Suspension
Rule 22e-3 sets specific tests a money market fund must meet before suspending redemptions: (i) at the end of a business day the fund has invested less than 10% of total assets in weekly liquid assets or (for government or retail funds) the fund's computed price per share rounded to the nearest one percent has deviated from the board-established stable price and the board determines such a deviation is likely; (ii) the board, including a majority of disinterested directors, irrevocably approves liquidation; and (iii) the fund notifies the Commission before suspending redemptions.
Conduit Funds May Also Pause Redemptions
If you hold shares of a registered investment company that owns money market fund shares under section 12(d)(1)(E) (a ‘‘conduit fund’’), that conduit fund may suspend redemptions if the underlying money market fund suspends redemptions under Rule 22e-3. A conduit fund that relies on the exemption must provide prompt notice of the suspension to the Commission.
Small Annual Notice Burden on Funds
Money market funds or conduit funds that rely on Rule 22e-3 must notify the Commission by electronic mail before suspending redemptions; notices are not kept confidential. The Commission estimates, for PRA purposes, one fund would file such a notice per year, taking about one hour of in-house attorney time at an estimated cost of $511 and total external costs of $584 annually.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
2026-10373, Registered Offering Reform
The SEC wants to make it easier and cheaper for more companies to sell their stocks and bonds to the public. They’re opening up special forms and benefits to more businesses, updating rules to be more modern, and cutting red tape by overriding some state rules. If you’re a company planning to raise money, these changes could speed things up and save you money, with feedback due by July 27, 2026.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-03336, Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF and Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF To Permit Staking of the Ether Held by the Trusts
NYSE Arca wants to update the Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETFs so they can earn extra rewards by staking the Ether they hold. This change affects investors in these ETFs and could boost returns without extra cost. The proposal was filed in February 2025 and is now open for public comments before any final decision.
Next: 2025-03350, Order Granting Temporary Exemptive Relief, Pursuant to Sections 17A and 36(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, From Certain Aspects of Rule 17ad-22(e)(6)(i) and Section 19(g)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
The SEC is giving some clearing agencies extra time before they have to follow new rules about how they handle margin (money held as a safety net) for U.S. Treasury securities. This temporary break helps these agencies get ready to separate margin amounts properly between direct and indirect participants. The new rules were supposed to start by March 31, 2025, but now there’s a short delay to keep things smooth and safe.