NYSE Gets Nod to Trade More Debt Securities—Brokers Rejoice Quietly
Published Date: 3/4/2025
Notice
Summary
The SEC approved the New York Stock Exchange’s request to update a special rule that lets certain unregistered debt securities trade on its bond system. Now, these debt securities can be traded if their company or parent company has stock listed on any national exchange, not just the NYSE. This change opens up more trading options without affecting costs or timing for traders and companies.
Analyzed Economic Effects
4 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
More unregistered bonds can trade on NYSE Bonds
As of February 26, 2025, the SEC amended a prior order so that debt securities not registered under the Exchange Act may trade on NYSE Bonds if the issuer or the issuer's parent has a class of common or preferred equity registered under Section 12(b) and listed on any national securities exchange (not just the NYSE). This change amends and supersedes the November 16, 2006 exemption and expands which companies’ unregistered debt can be traded on NYSE Bonds.
Debt removed if related equity delists
The NYSE must monitor daily for delistings of an issuer’s equity (or the parent’s equity if the issuer is a wholly-owned subsidiary). If those equity securities are delisted, the NYSE must ensure the issuer’s debt securities no longer trade on NYSE Bonds to meet the exemption’s conditions.
May increase price transparency for bond investors
The SEC said the amended exemption could encourage more trading of debt securities on national exchanges and that, to the extent that happens, it may promote greater price transparency for those debt securities. That could give investors clearer access to trade prices and bid/ask information when those debts trade on NYSE Bonds.
NYSE must label and notify listed vs traded bonds
The NYSE must identify on its website and on NYSE Bonds whether a debt security is 'listed' or only 'traded', notify members before trading begins, publish a press release about the mixed trading, and obtain corporate action data from ICE Data Services. These steps aim to help market participants understand which debt securities are trading under the exemption.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-20466, Adviser and Regulated Fund Custody Rules; Crypto Custody Rules
The SEC is updating rules for how investment advisers and funds handle crypto assets, making sure they keep these digital investments safe and properly reported. These changes affect advisers, funds, and anyone managing crypto securities, aiming to modernize rules and improve transparency. Comments on the proposal are open until December 7, 2026, so get ready to weigh in!
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-03431, Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.; Notice of Request for Extension of Time
Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline asked for more time—until August 29, 2025—to finish a gas pipeline project in Kansas because local approval is still pending. This delay affects the project’s original deadline of February 28, 2025, but no extra costs were mentioned yet. People can comment or get involved within 15 days if they want to weigh in on the extension.
Next: 2025-03433, Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 239
The Securities and Exchange Commission is asking to keep Rule 239 going, which helps certain clearing agencies share info about security-based swaps with market players. This rule mostly affects six clearing agencies, who spend about 2 hours updating info 20 times a year. No big money changes here, but they want your thoughts on making the process easier and clearer.