NYSE Ditches Yearly Meetings for Closed-End Funds
Published Date: 6/17/2025
Notice
Summary
The New York Stock Exchange wants to change its rules so that closed-end funds don’t have to hold yearly shareholder meetings anymore. This affects closed-end funds registered under the 1940 Act and could save them time and money. The change was proposed on June 6, 2025, and is now open for public comments before it can take effect.
Analyzed Economic Effects
4 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
Newly‑Listed Closed‑End Funds Exempted
The NYSE proposes that closed-end funds (CEFs) that list after approval would not have to hold annual shareholder meetings under Section 302.00 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The filing was made on June 6, 2025; existing CEFs listed before approval would still be required to hold annual meetings, and new funds could still voluntarily include annual meetings in their bylaws.
Aimed to Reduce Activism and Reopen IPO Market
The Exchange states removing the annual meeting requirement for newly‑listed CEFs could reduce activist targeting using discount arbitrage and help re-open the listed CEF IPO market; the filing notes there were zero listed CEF IPOs in 2023 and three in 2024. The Exchange says this change would remove an activist threat and encourage capital formation for new listed CEFs.
Existing CEFs Keep Meeting Requirement
CEFs that are already listed on the NYSE before the rule is approved would remain subject to the Exchange's annual shareholder meeting requirement. The Exchange says this approach preserves existing voting rights for current shareholders.
Business Development Companies Not Included
The Exchange explicitly does not propose to exempt business development companies (BDCs) from the annual shareholder meeting requirement; the exemption is limited to closed-end funds registered under the 1940 Act. BDCs listed under Section 102.04B would remain subject to Section 302.00.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
2026-10373, Registered Offering Reform
The SEC wants to make it easier and cheaper for more companies to sell their stocks and bonds to the public. They’re opening up special forms and benefits to more businesses, updating rules to be more modern, and cutting red tape by overriding some state rules. If you’re a company planning to raise money, these changes could speed things up and save you money, with feedback due by July 27, 2026.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-11099, Joint Industry Plan; Notice of Filing of Amendment to the National Market System Plan Establishing Procedures Under Rule 605 of Regulation NMS To Reflect Recent Amendments to Rule 605 of Regulation NMS
The big stock market players like FINRA and major exchanges are updating their rules to match recent changes made by the SEC. These updates will make reporting clearer and more modern, helping everyone understand how trades are tracked. The changes kick in soon and won’t cost anyone extra but will keep the system running smoothly and fairly.
Next: 2025-11101, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend MRX's Pricing Schedule Regarding a Complex Order Market Maker Fee Discount
Nasdaq MRX is giving Market Makers a bigger discount on fees when they trade complex orders against Priority Customer orders from their own affiliated members or entities. This change kicks in right away and helps Market Makers save money on both Penny and Non-Penny options. If you’re a Market Maker linked to Priority Customers, expect lower fees starting now!