Nasdaq Files Boring By-Law Tweaks to Stay Delaware Compliant
Published Date: 10/1/2025
Notice
Summary
Nasdaq MRX, LLC wants to update the official rules and documents of its parent company, Nasdaq, Inc., to match new Delaware laws and modern business practices. These changes affect how Nasdaq runs things behind the scenes but won’t cost extra or change trading. The updates are set to happen soon after approval and aim to keep Nasdaq sharp and up-to-date.
Analyzed Economic Effects
10 provisions identified: 9 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
Limits Officer Monetary Liability
The Certificate would let Nasdaq limit covered officers' monetary liability for breaches of the duty of care (similar to existing director exculpation). This change was approved by Nasdaq's Board on April 23, 2025 and by Nasdaq stockholders on June 11, 2025, and implements the authority in Delaware law (8 Del. C. Section 102(b)(7)).
Universal Proxy Compliance: Missed Steps Can Bar Nominees
Nasdaq would add a rule that if a Proposing Person uses Rule 14a-19 (the SEC universal proxy rule) but then fails to comply with specified parts of that rule, Nasdaq may disregard the proposed nominee and any received proxies or votes. The By-Laws also require, on request, that a Proposing Person deliver reasonable evidence of compliance no later than five business days before the meeting.
Narrower Info Requests for Director Nominees
Nasdaq would narrow what information it may require from a proposed director nominee. The By-Laws change limits requests to information reasonably needed to determine whether the nominee is qualified under Nasdaq's Certificate, By-Laws, exchange rules, or applicable law.
Remove 'Acting in Concert' Language
Nasdaq proposes deleting the phrase "acting in concert" from advance-notice and special-meeting provisions and replacing it with terms like "knowingly coordinating." The change is intended to stop plaintiffs from using the old phrase to find litigation targets.
Clarify 'Affiliate' and 'Competitor' Terms
The By-Laws would add parentheticals clarifying key terms: an "affiliate" is as shown on Nasdaq's most recent Form 10-K, and "principal competitor" is defined as for purposes of Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914. These clarifications apply to several advance-notice requirements.
Limit on Nominees When Board Size Grows
If the number of directors to be elected at an annual meeting increases effective at that meeting, a Proposing Person may not nominate more nominees than the number of directors to be elected. The By-Laws would add this explicit limit to Section 3.1(d).
Remove 'Sole Discretion' and 'Binding' Board Language
Nasdaq would delete language saying certain Board determinations are "in its sole discretion" or "binding on the Corporation and the stockholders" across multiple By-Laws sections. The change aligns the By-Laws with practice and addresses legal challenges to finality language.
Allow Universal-Proxy Nominees Into Proxy Materials
The By-Laws would make an exception to proxy-access exclusivity so that nominees included pursuant to, and in compliance with, Section 14a-19 of the Exchange Act (the SEC universal proxy rule) may be included in the Corporation's proxy materials.
Give Committees Broader Authority Under Delaware Law
Nasdaq would opt into Section 141(c)(2) of Delaware law and remove certain By-Laws limitations on committee actions, bringing committee authority into conformity with Delaware law and giving committees greater flexibility (including as to stock-related actions).
Remove Cap on Issuer Directors
The By-Laws would delete the current limit that the Board may include at least one but not more than two Issuer Directors, thereby removing the cap on how many Issuer Directors can serve on the Board.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
2026-10373, Registered Offering Reform
The SEC wants to make it easier and cheaper for more companies to sell their stocks and bonds to the public. They’re opening up special forms and benefits to more businesses, updating rules to be more modern, and cutting red tape by overriding some state rules. If you’re a company planning to raise money, these changes could speed things up and save you money, with feedback due by July 27, 2026.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-19177, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws of Its Parent Corporation, Nasdaq, Inc.
Nasdaq GEMX is updating the official rules and documents of its parent company, Nasdaq, Inc., to match new Delaware laws and modern business practices. These changes affect how Nasdaq runs things behind the scenes but won’t cost extra or change trading right now. The updates aim to keep Nasdaq sharp, legal, and ready for the future.
Next: 2025-19179, Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Ordering Window Deposit Requirement in Colocation Note 8
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is changing the rules about deposits for ordering power in its Mahwah Data Center. This update tweaks the deposit requirements during the 90-day ordering window, making it clearer and more efficient for users who need colocation services. The change takes effect immediately, so anyone using these services should pay attention to the new deposit rules and timing.