Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Enhance the Correlation Calculation for Bond Haircut Models and Make Other Changes
Published Date: 2/3/2026
Notice
Summary
The Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC) is updating how it calculates bond risk to make it smarter and more accurate. These changes affect financial firms that use FICC’s bond clearing services and could improve how much money they need to set aside for safety. The updates are proposed now, and the public can comment before they take effect.
Analyzed Economic Effects
4 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 4 costs, 0 mixed.
Use Alternate Vendor Correlations
FICC proposes to allow the use of index data from an alternate vendor to calculate correlations for short-term bond maturity buckets (Treasury 0–6 months, Treasury 6–12 months, and TIPS 0–12 months) when the designated vendor does not provide index data. Previously, correlations for those buckets were manually set to zero; changing this may increase Required Fund Deposits and Segregated Customer Margin Requirements for FICC Members.
Some Members Face Multi‑Million Dollar Hikes
At the Member Margin Portfolio level over the impact study period, FICC found the average start-of-day VaR Charge would have increased by about $0.22 million (0.09%). The largest average percentage increase for any Member Margin Portfolio would have been about 14.52% ($0.38 million) and the largest average dollar increase about $5.91 million (0.79%). If Margin Proxy were deployed, the average increase would be about $0.42 million (0.16%), with the largest percentage increase about 23.18% ($0.59 million) and the largest dollar increase about $17.35 million (0.34%).
Aggregate VaR Charges Increase
FICC's impact study for September 1, 2024 through August 31, 2025 found that, if the change had been in place, the average increase to aggregate VaR Charges at GSD would have been about $46 million (0.09%), with the largest increase about $85 million (0.15%). If Margin Proxy were deployed, the average increase would have been about $88 million (0.16%), with the largest increase about $163 million (0.38%).
Higher Margins Could Burden Weaker Firms
FICC states that increases in Required Fund Deposits and/or Segregated Customer Margin Requirements resulting from this change could burden participants that have lower operating margins or higher costs of capital than other participants. FICC notes the burden could affect competition among participants.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
2026-10373, Registered Offering Reform
The SEC wants to make it easier and cheaper for more companies to sell their stocks and bonds to the public. They’re opening up special forms and benefits to more businesses, updating rules to be more modern, and cutting red tape by overriding some state rules. If you’re a company planning to raise money, these changes could speed things up and save you money, with feedback due by July 27, 2026.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-02111, Newspapers Used for Publication of Legal Notices by the Intermountain Region: Utah, Nevada, Parts of Idaho and Wyoming
The Forest Service just announced which newspapers in Utah, Nevada, Idaho, and Wyoming will publish their legal notices starting now. This helps folks know where to find important info about forest projects and how to share their thoughts or objections on time. If you live or work near these forests, keep an eye on these papers to stay in the loop—no surprises, just clear updates!
Next: 2026-02113, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Repeal the Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Adopt a Certificate of Formation and Company Agreement
Nasdaq BX is switching things up by changing from a corporation to a Texas limited liability company called Nasdaq Texas, LLC. This means new official papers, a new name, and a new office address, but no big changes to how it runs day-to-day. The change is already in effect, so members and investors should take note now!