2026-06963Proposed RuleWallet

Treasury Pushes Stablecoin Firms Toward Bank Compliance

Published Date: 4/10/2026

Proposed Rule

Summary

The Treasury is proposing new rules that treat stablecoin issuers like banks when it comes to fighting money laundering and terrorism funding. These rules require stablecoin companies to have strong programs to catch bad actors and follow sanctions. Comments are open until June 9, 2026, and these changes could mean more compliance costs for stablecoin businesses.

Analyzed Economic Effects

8 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 7 costs, 1 mixed.

Stablecoin Issuers Treated Like Banks

If you run a permitted payment stablecoin issuer (PPSI), the rule says you will be treated as a "financial institution" under the Bank Secrecy Act and thus subject to all Federal laws about economic sanctions, preventing money laundering, customer identification, and due diligence.

Required AML Program Elements

PPSIs must maintain an effective anti-money laundering (AML) program that includes appropriate risk assessments, designation of an officer to supervise the program, retention of appropriate records, monitoring and reporting of suspicious transactions, and enhanced due diligence for higher-risk activity.

Technical Controls: Block, Freeze, Reject

The rule requires PPSIs to have technical capabilities, policies, and procedures to block, freeze, and reject specific or impermissible transactions that violate Federal or State law, rules, or regulations.

Sanctions Compliance Program Requirement

PPSIs must maintain an effective economic sanctions compliance program, including verification of sanctions lists consistent with Federal law, and have the capability to comply with lawful orders such as freezing or seizing stablecoins.

Subject to OFAC Enforcement and Penalties

Because OFAC administers and enforces U.S. economic sanctions, PPSIs will be subject to OFAC enforcement tools, including blocking transactions and the possibility of civil money penalties for sanctions violations.

Proposal Recognizes Upfront Compliance Costs

The proposal and public comments acknowledge that applying BSA, AML, and sanctions requirements to PPSIs could create meaningful upfront compliance costs, particularly for new or previously unregulated entrants, and the NPRM notes clearer rules could lower long-term friction.

Primary vs. Secondary Market Definitions

The proposal defines a "primary market" (PPSI directly interacting with users for issuance, redemption, repurchase, burning, reissuing, and custodial services) and a "secondary market" (activity not directly involving the PPSI except via a smart contract). FinCEN and OFAC will use these categories to describe activity and set the parameters of obligations.

Customer Identification Program (CIP) to Follow

The GENIUS Act requires PPSIs to maintain a customer identification program, and the proposal states the customer identification program requirement is expected to be the subject of a separate rulemaking.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Key Dates

Published Date
Comments Due
4/10/2026
6/9/2026

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Treasury Department
Foreign Assets Control Office
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register