Fed Plans Zero Interest on New Payment Accounts
Published Date: 5/26/2026
Proposed Rule
Summary
The Federal Reserve is proposing a change to how it treats special-purpose payment accounts, called Payment Accounts, by not paying interest on the money held in them. This update affects banks with master accounts and these new Payment Accounts but won’t change reserve requirements, which stay at zero. If you want to share your thoughts, you have until July 27, 2026, to comment!
Analyzed Economic Effects
5 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 3 costs, 1 mixed.
Fed won't pay interest on Payment Accounts
If your institution opens a Payment Account at a Federal Reserve Bank, the Reserve Banks would not pay interest on balances held in that Payment Account under the proposed revisions to Regulation D. This change is explicit in the proposal and would treat Payment Accounts differently than master accounts for interest purposes.
Payment Account holders barred from EBAs
Under the proposal, a Payment Account holder would not be allowed to participate in an excess balance account (EBA). EBAs currently pay interest on participant balances, so Payment Account holders would lose the option to hold balances in an interest-paying EBA.
Closing Balance Limit of up to $1 billion
The Board proposes that each Payment Account would be subject to a Closing Balance Limit set by the Reserve Bank based on expected payment activity, and that limit would not exceed $1,000,000,000. Reserve Banks would review an individual Payment Account's Closing Balance Limit at least annually and could allow temporary exceedances in unusual circumstances (with Board consultation if the Temporary Closing Amount exceeds $1 billion).
Reserve requirements remain at zero
The proposal would not change reserve requirement ratios; they would remain set at zero percent, consistent with prior Board actions (reserve ratios have been zero since March 2020).
Payment Accounts are optional access
Payment Accounts would be a new, optional way for institutions to request Federal Reserve accounts and services; no existing account holders would be forced to change accounts, and institutions could still request a master account or access services via a correspondent. The Board states Payment Accounts are optional and would not impose mandatory requirements on small entities.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-08298, Regulatory Capital Rule: Community Bank Leverage Ratio Framework
Starting July 1, 2026, community banks get a break! The minimum leverage ratio drops from 9% to 8%, making it easier for smaller banks to meet rules. Plus, banks can now stay in this easier framework longer—up to four straight quarters instead of two—helping them manage their money better without rushing.
2026-05960, Regulatory Capital Rules: Regulatory Capital and Standardized Approach for Risk-Weighted Assets
Big banks and community banks are getting new rules to better measure the risks in their loans and investments. The changes update how banks count certain assets and income when figuring out their safety net money, called regulatory capital. These updates aim to make banks safer and smarter with their money, with some rules kicking in soon and affecting how much capital banks need to hold.
2025-21625, Regulatory Capital Rule: Revisions to the Community Bank Leverage Ratio Framework
The government wants to make it easier for small banks to stay in a special low-risk capital program by lowering the required leverage ratio from 9% to 8%. They’re also giving banks more time—up to four quarters instead of two—to fix any issues without losing their spot. Banks and bank holding companies should weigh in by January 30, 2026, as these changes could save them money and reduce red tape.
2025-21626, Regulatory Capital Rule: Modifications to the Enhanced Supplementary Leverage Ratio Standards for U.S. Global Systemically Important Bank Holding Companies and Their Subsidiary Depository Institutions; Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity and Long-Term Debt Requirements for U.S. Global Systemically Important Bank Holding Companies
Big U.S. banks that are super important to the economy are getting new rules to keep them safer and stronger. These changes tweak how much money they must keep on hand and how they handle long-term debt, helping prevent financial trouble. The new rules kick in soon and could affect how these banks manage billions in assets and debt.
2026-15774, Regulatory Modernization and Relief for Mutual Holding Companies
The Board invites comment on a notice of proposed rulemaking (proposal) to modernize the regulatory framework applicable to mutual holding companies (MHCs), primarily through proposed revisions to Regulation MM (12 CFR part 239), which governs the formation, operations, activities, and conversion of savings and loan holding companies in mutual form. The proposal would amend Regulation MM by, among other things, eliminating certain dividend waiver requirements, reducing burden associated with conversions from mutual-to-stock form, revising certain post-conversion restrictions, eliminating the requirement that subsidiary holding companies of MHCs obtain federal charters, and revising and clarifying other provisions of the regulation. The proposal also would amend the capital rule (12 CFR part 217) to clarify that certain mutual capital instruments may qualify as regulatory capital and to codify model term sheets for mutual capital certificates as appendices to the regulation.
2026-15777, Loans to Executive Officers, Directors, and Principal Shareholders of Member Banks; Bank Holding Companies
The Board is inviting public comment on proposed amendments to Regulation O, which governs loans by member banks to their insiders and insiders of their affiliates. The proposed amendments would update and modernize the regulation, increase transparency by clarifying requirements and incorporating existing interpretations, and promote efficiency by reducing regulatory burden. The proposed amendments also would incorporate existing statutory requirements that are not currently reflected in the regulation. Moreover, the proposed amendments would update several outdated dollar-based thresholds in Regulation O and index these thresholds going forward. In addition, the proposed amendments would address the application of Regulation O to member banks that lend to companies that are presumed to be controlled by large asset management companies through passive investment funds. Finally, the proposed amendments would revise and reorganize the regulation to streamline the text and make it more accessible.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-10376, Regulation A: Extensions of Credit by Federal Reserve Banks
The Federal Reserve is proposing a rule that says if you have a special-purpose payment account, you can’t borrow money from the Fed’s discount window. This change won’t affect the usual borrowing programs or interest rates. If you want to share your thoughts, you have until July 27, 2026, to speak up!
Next: 2026-10379, Schedules of Controlled Substances; Removal of Exemption Status for Inactive Butalbital Products
The DEA wants to remove certain inactive butalbital prescription products from their special exemption list because these products aren’t available anymore or the companies behind them are gone. This means these products will now be treated like controlled substances, not exempt ones. If you have thoughts, you’ve got until June 25, 2026, to speak up—no money changes for active products, just a cleanup of the list!