NSCC Proposes Stronger Risk Buffers for ETP Trades
Published Date: 6/4/2026
Notice
Summary
The National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) wants to improve how it handles risks from exchange-traded products (ETPs) by updating its Clearing Fund rules. This change affects NSCC members who trade these products and aims to keep the system safer and stronger. The new rules could impact how much money members need to put into the fund, with the proposal open for public comments starting June 2026.
Analyzed Economic Effects
4 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 3 costs, 0 mixed.
Gap Risk Charge: Map & Decompose ETFs
NSCC would change how it calculates the Gap Risk Charge by mapping and decomposing certain ETFs into their underlying holdings (including mapping leveraged/inverse ETFs and single-stock ETFs) and netting direct and indirect exposures. In NSCC's Impact Study (Jan 2025–Feb 2026) this change increased the overall daily Gap Risk Charge by about $223 million (from $727 million to about $950 million), and the top 20 member accounts saw average daily increases ranging from approximately $4.4 million to $23.4 million.
Bid-Ask Spread Charge: More Granular ETP Fees
NSCC would apply more granular basis point charges for different ETP sub-categories (for example, by capitalization or asset class such as cryptocurrency or fixed income ETPs) when calculating the Bid-Ask Spread Charge. The Impact Study showed an overall average daily increase in the Bid-Ask Spread Charge of about $6 million (from $96 million to about $102 million); individual member impacts in the top 20 ranged from reductions of about $75,000–$100,000 for two accounts to increases of about $82,000–$752,000 for others.
Fat Tail Calibration: VaR Tail Risk Changes
NSCC would add rule language describing its Fat Tail Adjustment Factor and allow calibrating tail-risk parameters by Member portfolio type instead of using a single industry-index-based factor. In the Impact Study, recalibrating the Fat Tail Adjustment Factor reduced the average daily parametric VaR Charge by about $168 million (from $5.49 billion to about $5.32 billion); the top 20 Member reductions ranged from about $2.6 million to $13 million, or roughly 3.3%–3.7% reductions for those accounts.
Net Member Impact: ~$60M Increase (<1% Total VaR)
Taking all proposed changes together, NSCC's Impact Study found an overall increase of approximately $60 million across Members during Jan 2025–Feb 2026, which NSCC says is less than 1 percent of the total VaR Charge. NSCC plans individual outreach to Members and expects to implement the changes by no later than October 30, 2026; the public comment period for the Commission ends June 25, 2026.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
2026-10373, Registered Offering Reform
The SEC wants to make it easier and cheaper for more companies to sell their stocks and bonds to the public. They’re opening up special forms and benefits to more businesses, updating rules to be more modern, and cutting red tape by overriding some state rules. If you’re a company planning to raise money, these changes could speed things up and save you money, with feedback due by July 27, 2026.
2026-10222, Enhancement of Emerging Growth Company Accommodations and Simplification of Filer Status for Reporting Companies
The SEC is making it easier for companies that report their finances by simplifying their categories into just two groups: big and small filers. Smaller companies, including emerging growth ones, will get more time to file reports and enjoy simpler rules, while big companies keep stricter standards. These changes aim to save time and money, with feedback open until July 20, 2026.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-11143, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the BondBloxx Private Credit Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(f), Trust Issued Receipts
The SEC is taking extra time to decide if the Cboe BZX Exchange can list and trade shares of the BondBloxx Private Credit Trust. This affects investors interested in new trust-issued receipts and means the decision deadline is now July 21, 2026. No money changes yet, but this move could open new trading options soon!
Next: 2026-11145, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 519C, Mass Cancellation of Trading Interest
Miami International Securities Exchange (MIAX) is upgrading its mass cancellation rule to add a cool new feature called Selective Liquidity Auto Purge (SLAP). This lets traders cancel specific groups of orders more precisely and quickly, making trading smoother and smarter. The change is effective immediately, helping members save time and avoid costly mistakes during busy market moments.