Municipal Bond Dealers Get Clearer Confirmation Rules
Published Date: 6/23/2026
Notice
Summary
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) is updating Rule G-12 to simplify and clarify how dealers confirm certain municipal securities trades that can’t be checked automatically. This change affects brokers and dealers by retiring old confusing guidance and making the rules clearer. The new rules will kick in within a year, with no extra costs expected.
Analyzed Economic Effects
5 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
Specific Confirmation Info Standardized
The amended Rule G-12(c) lists the exact information required on inter-dealer confirmations, including confirming party contact info, contra party identification, purchase/sale designation, par value (or maturity value for zero coupon), trade date, settlement date, yield and dollar price computed per MSRB Rule G-33, amount of concession, final monies, delivery details, issuer name, a securities identifier (CUSIP or alternative), maturity date, interest rate, and dated date. The rule groups these items into three categories (transaction info, identification info, and additional securities info).
Dealers: Confirmation Rules Clarified
If you are a broker or dealer, Rule G-12(c) has been amended to put existing interpretive guidance into the rule and to retire or revise old guidance for inter-dealer municipal securities trades that are ineligible for automated comparison. The change explicitly covers inter-dealer trades in digital, tokenized, or other municipal securities that do not have CUSIP numbers and will apply equally to all dealers who engage in transactions subject to Rule G-12(c).
Some Descriptive Disclosures Removed
The amendment removes certain descriptive confirmation requirements from Rule G-12(c) for inter-dealer trades, including credit backing, features of securities, status of securities, and tax information. The MSRB noted that dealers remain subject to other MSRB rules for obligations that are not part of inter-dealer confirmations.
No New Requirements or Extra Costs
The MSRB and the SEC stated that the amended Rule G-12(c) would not impose any new requirements, would eliminate obsolete or superfluous requirements, and that no extra costs are expected. The Commission also found the change would apply equally to all dealers subject to Rule G-12(c).
Implementation Timing and Guidance Retirement
The MSRB will publish a regulatory notice listing the interpretive guidance items being retired or revised no later than 90 days after the SEC approval, and the rule's effective date will occur no later than one year after approval. The retirement and revision of related interpretive guidance will occur simultaneously with the rule's effective date.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
2026-10373, Registered Offering Reform
The SEC wants to make it easier and cheaper for more companies to sell their stocks and bonds to the public. They’re opening up special forms and benefits to more businesses, updating rules to be more modern, and cutting red tape by overriding some state rules. If you’re a company planning to raise money, these changes could speed things up and save you money, with feedback due by July 27, 2026.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-12525, Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by The Options Clearing Corporation To Amend Its System for Theoretical Analysis and Numerical Simulation Methodology Description To Incorporate Options Implied Interest Rates as an Additional Source of Interest Rates Inputs for Constructing the Interest Rate Discount Curve Used in Options Pricing.
The Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) is updating how it calculates interest rates used in pricing options by adding a new source called 'options implied interest rates.' This change helps make option prices more accurate and affects traders and investors who rely on OCC’s pricing models. The update is under review now, and it could impact how options are valued and traded soon.
Next: 2026-12527, Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Rules 2627 And 2628 To Integrate Several Definitions and Concepts From the Amended CTA/CQ Plan, Reorganize Rule 2622, and Make Conforming Changes to Related Rules
MIAX PEARL is updating its rules to include new definitions and ideas from a big industry plan called the Amended CTA/CQ Plan. They’re also cleaning up and reorganizing an existing rule to make things clearer and easier to follow. These changes take effect right away and mainly affect traders and firms using MIAX PEARL’s platform, with no new fees or costs announced.