2026-16590Proposed RuleWallet

FCC ponders kid-proofing school Wi-Fi with E-Rate funds.

Published Date: 8/14/2026

Proposed Rule

Summary

In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) seeks comment on measures the Commission can take to better protect children when using E-Rate-funded networks, the Commission's progress in ensuring affordable access to high-speed broadband to and within schools and libraries, and whether the Commission's current interpretation of the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) is the best reading of the statute. The Commission also proposes actions to strengthen E-Rate program integrity and streamline program administration.

Analyzed Economic Effects

6 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 4 costs, 2 mixed.

E‑Rate Program Could Be Limited or Ended

The FCC is asking whether the E‑Rate program should be narrowed, limited, or even sunset because many schools and libraries now report broadband connectivity. The agency specifically asks whether Congress's directive in section 254(h) has been satisfied and whether the Commission has authority to limit or end the program.

Special Construction Funding May Be Cut

The FCC is considering whether to limit or eliminate E‑Rate funding for special construction and self‑provisioned network construction (including dark fiber) and whether applicants should have to disclose other funding sources (for example BEAD) to avoid duplication. The NPRM notes $136.6 million disbursed for self‑provisioned construction since the program added it in funding year 2016.

Discount Rates Could Be Changed or Phased Out

The FCC is seeking comment on changing the E‑Rate discount matrix, including phasing out funding for areas with low National School Lunch Program (NSLP) participation, adjusting rural vs. urban discounts, or limiting support to rural or single‑provider areas. These changes could reduce discounts (now 20%–90%) for some schools and libraries.

Funding Could Be Conditioned on Screen Time Rules

The FCC is asking whether E‑Rate support should be conditioned on schools and libraries imposing screen time limits or giving parents a meaningful opt‑out for screen‑based instruction. The FCC also asks who would set such limits and what costs schools would incur to implement them.

CIPA May Extend to All Devices and Network Filters

The FCC is seeking comment on whether the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) should be read to require protection (for example, network‑level filtering) for any device that accesses a school's or library's E‑Rate‑funded network, including third‑party devices. The FCC asks about technical capability and costs to distinguish and filter devices.

Head Start and Pre‑K Eligibility Could Be Narrowed

The FCC is considering whether Head Start and pre‑kindergarten students and facilities should have reduced or removed eligibility for E‑Rate support, or be required to cost‑allocate and exclude these students from funding requests. In FY2025, approximately $15.5 million was committed to Head Start (about $7.4 million disbursed to date) and $43.9 million committed to pre‑kindergarten (about $21.6 million disbursed to date).

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Key Dates

Published Date
Effective Date
Comments Due
8/14/2026
10/13/2026
11/12/2026

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Federal Communications Commission
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register