2026-18804Proposed RuleWallet

FAA Redraws Airspace Lines Over Redmond Airport

Published Date: 9/15/2026

Proposed Rule

Summary

This action proposes to modify the Class D and Class E airspace area designated as a surface area, modify the Class E airspace area designated as an extension to a Class D or Class E surface area, and modify the Class E airspace area extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Roberts Field/Redmond Municipal Airport, Redmond, OR. This action would support the safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

Analyzed Economic Effects

4 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Controlled Airspace Expanded to 5.6 Miles

If you operate aircraft at or near Roberts Field/Redmond Municipal Airport (Redmond, OR), the Class D and Class E surface airspace would be expanded to a 5.6-mile radius (including airspace 3.9 miles east and 3.2 miles west extending to 5.6 miles south) to better contain Category E circling and departing IFR operations. The FAA says this supports IFR safety and expects at most de minimis costs or minor rerouting for operators.

Class E Extension Widened for RNAV/RNP Approaches

If you fly IFR into Roberts Field using RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 29 or Special RNAV (RNP) M RWY 29, the Class E extension would be widened and realigned so those procedures are contained when arriving aircraft are less than 1,000 feet above the surface. The change is intended to better contain arriving IFR aircraft during low-altitude segments.

Class E (>=700 ft) Area Reduced in Several Sectors

If you operate IFR near Roberts Field, the Class E airspace that begins at 700 feet above the surface would be reduced to the north, east, and southwest so it more closely contains arriving IFR aircraft descending below 1,500 feet and departing IFR aircraft until reaching 1,200 feet above the surface. The proposal changes sector extents and distances described in the amendment.

FAA: De Minimis Costs; No Significant Small-Entity Impact

The FAA explicitly states the proposal is routine, is not a "significant regulatory action," and is expected to result in at most de minimis costs from compliance or minor flight rerouting; it certifies the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Key Dates

Published Date
Comments Due
9/15/2026
10/30/2026

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Transportation Department
Federal Aviation Administration
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register