All Roll Calls
Yes: 212 • No: 212
Sponsored By: Representative Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5]
Failed
End U.S. hostilities with Iran within 30 days. This concurrent resolution would direct the President under the War Powers Resolution to terminate the use of U.S. Armed Forces in hostilities against Iran by that deadline unless Congress provides a declaration of war or a specific authorization for use of military force. It preserves narrow defensive exceptions and keeps intelligence activities intact.
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
This concurrent resolution failed to pass. Had it passed, it would have directed the President to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against Iran by not later than 30 days after the date described in section 1(6), unless Congress declared war or enacted a specific authorization for use of military force against Iran. It would have allowed narrow exceptions for self‑defense, protecting U.S. forces and diplomatic facilities, and for keeping a defensive troop presence in the region, and it would not have required removing forces not engaged in hostilities. The resolution also said it did not authorize the use of military force and it protected intelligence, counterintelligence, and investigative activities and allowed intelligence sharing when the President determined it was appropriate and in the national security interests of the United States.
Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5]
NJ • D
Rep. Landsman, Greg [D-OH-1]
OH • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Cuellar
TX • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Rep. Golden, Jared F. [D-ME-2]
ME • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Costa
CA • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Rep. Panetta, Jimmy [D-CA-19]
CA • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Gonzalez, V.
TX • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Rep. Suozzi, Thomas R. [D-NY-3]
NY • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Gray
CA • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25]
FL • D
Sponsored 3/12/2026
Rep. Goodlander, Maggie [D-NH-2]
NH • D
Sponsored 4/28/2026
Rep. Schneider, Bradley Scott [D-IL-10]
IL • D
Sponsored 5/12/2026
All Roll Calls
Yes: 212 • No: 212
house vote • 5/14/2026
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Yes: 212 • No: 212
HR14 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore robust federal oversight of voting rights by rewriting Section 2 and creating a broad practice-based preclearance system. It sets new tests for vote-dilution and vote-denial claims, adds retrogression rules for actions on or after January 1, 2021, and requires extensive public notice, data disclosure, and observer powers. - Minority and language-minority voters: Provides clearer legal paths to challenge districting and practices that dilute or abridge votes, recognizes coalitions of minority groups, and applies retrogression rules to actions from January 1, 2021. - States and local election officials: Triggers preclearance using a 25-year lookback with numeric thresholds and creates an administrative bailout that requires demonstrating sustained compliance over a 10-year period to avoid coverage. - Enforcement, oversight, and courts: Expands who may sue to include private "aggrieved persons", centralizes observer authority in the Attorney General, and authorizes pre-suit inspection and information demands that courts may enforce or modify.
HR17 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Strengthening pay equity by expanding who is protected and limiting employers from using past pay, the Paycheck Fairness Act would tighten how pay differences are justified and increase enforcement and data collection. - Workers and prospective employees would gain a ban on employer reliance on wage history and new nonretaliation protections for wage discussions. The bill lets a candidate voluntarily share prior pay only after a job offer and only to justify a higher wage. - Employers would face new civil penalties for wage-history violations starting at $5,000 for a first offense and rising by $1,000 per subsequent offense to a $10,000 cap. Affected workers could recover damages up to $10,000 plus attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief where appropriate. - Federal enforcement and oversight would increase. The EEOC and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would enforce the rules. The bill would create a National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force and require expanded pay-data collection by EEOC, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and OFCCP from federal contractors. Provisions would take effect six months after enactment.
HR842 — Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act
Would expand Medicare to cover multi-cancer early detection screening tests. It defines eligible tests as certain FDA-cleared or approved genomic blood tests or comparable biological-sample tests and directs the Secretary to use the national coverage determinations process to decide when they are covered.
HR1065 — Protect Our Letter Carriers Act of 2025
Heightened protections for U.S. Postal Service letter carriers. This bill would fund security upgrades, push federal prosecutors to prioritize assaults on postal employees, and align sentencing for those attacks with rules for assaults on law enforcement. - Postal workers would get new security gear and safer collection points via high-security collection boxes and electronic mailbox keys funded at $1.4 billion per year for FY2026–2030. - The Attorney General would be directed to vigorously prosecute assaults on postal employees and to appoint an Assistant U.S. Attorney in every federal judicial district to coordinate those cases not later than one year after enactment. - The U.S. Sentencing Commission would be required to amend guidelines so assaults or robberies against postal employees are treated like assaults on law enforcement, with guideline changes due by May 1 following the first year after enactment. This bill would authorize $1.4 billion per year for FY2026–2030, totaling $7.0 billion in authorized federal spending.
HR2550 — Protect America's Workforce Act
Preserves federal employees' collective bargaining agreements. This Act nullifies the Executive Order titled "Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs." - Federal employees and unions: Collective bargaining agreements that were in effect on March 26, 2025 remain valid and continue to apply through each contract's stated term. - Federal agencies and federal funds: Agencies may not obligate or spend federal funds to carry out that Executive Order, and the Executive Order has no force or effect.
HR7973 — Momnibus Act
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph — ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
The federal government runs two closely related conservation-workforce pipelines on public lands: the Youth Conservation Corps YCC and the Public Lands Corps PLC. YCC is a summer employment program fo
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 1952 — the "Steel Seizure Case" — is the Supreme Court's foundational decision defining the limits of presidential power, and the source of the most
The Uruguay Round Agreements Act URAA of 1994 19 U.S.C. §§ 3501–3624 implemented U.S. membership in the World Trade Organization WTO and incorporated the Uruguay Round trade agreements — the broadest
- WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding DSU, Annex 2 to the WTO Agreement — Establishes the WTO dispute settlement system: consultations, panel proceedings, Appellate Body review, adoption of reports,