HR6660119th CongressWALLET

Replace Animal Tests Act of 2025

Sponsored By: Representative Moskowitz, Jared [D-FL-23]

Introduced

Summary

Would ban submitting animal-test data to federal agencies when a scientifically satisfactory non-animal test method exists. It would shift regulatory requirements toward validated non-animal methods, set agency guidance and public reporting rules, and allow limited exceptions and penalties.

Show full summary
  • Regulated companies and product developers would face enforcement. Agencies could refuse animal-derived data and impose civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation.
  • Federal agencies named in the bill would have one year to issue guidance on non-animal methods and must publish annual reports on animal use, waivers, species, and testing types.
  • Animals used in testing would get stronger protections when no non-animal method exists. Companies would have to minimize the number of animals and reduce pain, suffering, distress, or lasting harm.
  • Exceptions preserve some existing data and foreign compliance. Data generated before enactment, tests done to meet foreign rules, and agency-requested animal tests with written justification would still be allowed.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.

New rules for animal test data

If enacted, this bill would bar submission of animal-test data to FDA, EPA, USDA, or CPSC when the agency has accepted an alternative non-animal test method or has issued a waiver. It would allow animal data in four situations: data made before enactment; tests done abroad to meet a foreign rule; data requested after an agency finds existing data insufficient and no non-animal method was practicably available; and specific animal tests requested in writing with a written justification. Each covered agency would have to issue guidance on acceptable non-animal methods within one year and could change its regulations to remove animal-data requirements. Agencies would publish a progress report within one year and then yearly listing animals used, species, test types, waivers issued, and purposes. Agencies could refuse noncompliant animal data and impose civil penalties up to $10,000 for each violation. When no non-animal method exists and no waiver is granted, entities would have to use as few animals as possible and minimize pain, suffering, distress, or lasting harm.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Moskowitz, Jared [D-FL-23]

FL • D

Cosponsors

  • Schakowsky

    IL • D

    Sponsored 12/11/2025

  • Rep. Thanedar, Shri [D-MI-13]

    MI • D

    Sponsored 12/11/2025

  • Rep. Waters, Maxine [D-CA-43]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 1/8/2026

  • Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

    DC • D

    Sponsored 1/14/2026

  • Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]

    NV • D

    Sponsored 2/4/2026

  • Rep. Goldman, Daniel S. [D-NY-10]

    NY • D

    Sponsored 3/12/2026

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation