All Roll Calls
Yes: 247 • No: 164
Sponsored By: Representative Pfluger
Passed House
Creates a presidential designation process to address foreign nationalization of U.S.-owned ports and expands limited transit allowances for vessels tied to those disputes. The bill would revise when a vessel can enter or move through ports under U.S. jurisdiction and would let the President designate a foreign port, harbor, or marine terminal after a Western Hemisphere partner government nationalizes or otherwise seizes property owned or controlled by a U.S. person, subject to arbitration limits tied to free trade agreements.
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
If enacted, the President would be able to label a foreign port or terminal as covered after that country seizes U.S.-owned property there. This would only apply in Western Hemisphere countries that have a free trade deal with the United States, and where the port was reachable only through land owned or controlled by a U.S. person. A ship that used a covered port would be allowed to enter or operate in U.S. ports or waters in an emergency or if its owner authorizes it. The President would not be able to make a designation if the dispute is already in pending arbitration under that trade deal. The President would have to remove the label if ownership is restored, seizure measures end, full compensation in convertible currency or an agreed equivalent is paid, or the dispute is otherwise resolved. These changes would take effect upon enactment.
Pfluger
TX • R
Rep. Carbajal, Salud O. [D-CA-24]
CA • D
Sponsored 1/15/2026
Sewell
AL • D
Sponsored 1/15/2026
Rep. Mann, Tracey [R-KS-1]
KS • R
Sponsored 1/15/2026
Edwards
NC • R
Sponsored 1/15/2026
McGuire
VA • R
Sponsored 1/16/2026
Rep. Moore, Barry [R-AL-1]
AL • R
Sponsored 1/20/2026
Rep. Strong, Dale W. [R-AL-5]
AL • R
Sponsored 1/22/2026
All Roll Calls
Yes: 247 • No: 164
house vote • 3/27/2026
On Passage
Yes: 247 • No: 164
HR2853 — Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Expands federal tools against organized retail and supply-chain theft. This bill would broaden civil forfeiture and money-laundering rules and create a new interagency Center to coordinate federal, state, local, tribal, and private partners. - Law enforcement: It would give federal investigators new forfeiture triggers and money-laundering reach, add $5,000 aggregation thresholds for certain stolen‑goods offenses, and require the Department of Homeland Security to stand up a coordination Center within 90 days and wind it down after 7 years. - Retailers and the private sector: The Center must build relationships with industry and create a secure information‑sharing system, track trends, and issue an initial report within 1 year followed by annual public reports. - People and property affected by investigations: The bill makes interstate shipment offenses and the transportation and sale of stolen goods eligible for federal forfeiture and treats general‑use prepaid cards and store gift cards as covered instruments for money‑laundering rules.
HR4577 — Defending American Property Abroad Act of 2025
Blocks use of foreign ports nationalized or expropriated by certain governments. It also expands U.S. trade law to treat seizures and nationality-based discrimination against U.S. assets as grounds for trade action. - Shipping and passenger operators: Vessels that were loaded at or previously held at a designated prohibited port cannot import or release goods into the United States, dock in U.S. ports, release passengers, or receive servicing such as repair, refueling, or provisioning. This applies to passenger vessels that carry 149 or more passengers. - U.S. businesses and investors: Expands Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to add direct or indirect nationalization or expropriation, denial of due process, arbitrary or capricious treatment, and discrimination based on nationality as actionable harms that can trigger trade remedies. - Geographic scope and who is protected: Targets ports and related infrastructure in Western Hemisphere free-trade partners and defines "United States person" to include citizens, lawful permanent residents, and entities at least 50 percent U.S.-owned.
HR3151 — SHIPS for America Act of 2025
Rebuild U.S. commercial shipbuilding and a U.S.-flag strategic fleet by pairing new tax credits, grants, and operating payments with stronger cargo-preference rules and workforce and innovation programs to restore domestic capacity and sealift readiness. It centralizes maritime strategy in a White House advisor and a Maritime Security Board and funds a broad set of industrial, port, and training programs to favor U.S.-built, U.S.-crewed vessels.
HR4398 — Veteran Burial Timeliness and Death Certificate Accountability Act
48-hour certification deadline for VA clinicians to sign death certificates for veterans who die of natural causes, plus annual reports tracking compliance and reasons for delays. The bill aims to reduce long waits that block burials and survivor benefits.
HR2102 — Major Richard Star Act
Establishes concurrent receipt for retirees with combat-related disabilities. This bill would let eligible retirees receive both military retired pay and veterans' disability compensation for the same months without the offset rules that currently reduce payments. - Families of disabled retirees: Veterans with combat-related disabilities would receive both retired pay and VA disability compensation for the same months, increasing their monthly household income. - Defense and VA payment rules: The bill would amend 10 U.S.C. 1413a and 10 U.S.C. 1414 to exempt retired pay from reductions under 38 U.S.C. 5304 and 5305 and add a clear monthly no-offset rule. - Implementation and technical changes: It renames and updates chapter sections, adjusts cross-references, and applies to payments beginning the first month after enactment.
HR979 — AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act of 2025
This bill would require AM broadcast capability to be installed as standard equipment in passenger motor vehicles. It focuses on driver-accessible AM reception, allows digital AM audio to count for compliance, and links vehicle AM capability to emergency alerting through IPAWS. - Drivers and households: Built-in, driver-accessible AM reception would make it easier for people to get local AM stations and emergency alerts from their vehicles. The bill allows devices that receive digital AM to meet the requirement. - Vehicle manufacturers: The Department of Transportation would need to issue a rule within 1 year, with a general compliance deadline no later than 2 years after the rule is issued. Small manufacturers that produced no more than 40,000 passenger vehicles in 2022 would get at least 4 years to comply. - Oversight and emergency systems: States would be barred from imposing their own AM-access rules. The bill mandates interim labels and pricing protections for cars without AM, authorizes civil penalties and DOJ injunctions for violations, requires a GAO study and a congressional briefing within 1 year, and includes an 8-year sunset for the authority.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph — ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
The federal government is the largest landowner in the United States — managing 640 million acres, or approximately 28% of the country's total land area. To put that in context: federal land is larger
The federal government is the world's largest lender, holding roughly $1.5 trillion in direct loan receivables and backstopping more than $5 trillion in loan guarantees — yet almost none of this shows
The United States federal statistical system is deliberately decentralized — 13 principal statistical agencies spread across 11 departments, each embedded within a mission agency whose policy work the
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization's most misunderstood provision is Article 5: an attack on one member "shall be considered an attack against them all" — but the treaty does not require any speci