All Roll Calls
Yes: 420 • No: 0
Sponsored By: Representative Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4]
Passed House
Public disclosure of taxpayer-funded sexual harassment settlements in the House. This resolution requires a single, public list that shows names and the total amount of taxpayer funds tied to reviews or investigations involving sexual harassment, sexual abuse, or sexual misconduct and related payments. The Committee on Ethics and the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights must publish the consolidated list within 60 days and the Clerk must provide an attest to the information.
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
The House directs the Committee on Ethics and the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights to publish one public list within 60 days after June 30, 2026. For each Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner with taxpayer-funded payments, list the name and the total taxpayer funds across all settlements, reimbursements, awards, payments, or other financial considerations. Cases must come from House ethics reviews or investigations about sexual harassment, sexual abuse, or sexual misconduct. The release also shows totals for three groups: member cases without sexual misconduct, employee cases with it, and employee cases without it. Any matter counts as sexual misconduct if any part involved it, even if resolved under another claim. This applies only to matters the Ethics Committee or the Workplace Rights Office reviewed, conducted, or facilitated.
Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4]
KY • R
There are no cosponsors for this bill.
All Roll Calls
Yes: 420 • No: 0
house vote • 6/30/2026
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Yes: 420 • No: 0
HR277, Matthew Lawrence Perna Act of 2025
Would expand protections and legal remedies for people involved in nonviolent political protests. It focuses on pretrial release, new civil damages for wrongful detention, limits on using national security tools against U.S. citizens, and faster, more local trials for some protest-related charges. - Protesters and detained people: Would bar pretrial detention for a "covered political protest offense" that is not a crime of violence and would let people sue the United States or federal officers for damages if they were detained but not convicted or had charges dropped. - Defendants and courts: Would make speedy-trial timing apply to covered political protest offenses and let defendants charged in the District of Columbia choose trial venue in the federal district where they primarily live. - U.S. citizens and oversight: Would ban use of a defined set of "national security authorities" against a U.S. citizen unless the person is intentionally acting as an agent of a foreign power, and would add definitions and remedies for malicious prosecution and "malicious overprosecution."
HR2395, SHORT Act
Reclassifies short‑barreled rifles and shotguns under federal law and limits state oversight. The SHORT Act would change the Internal Revenue Code and Title 18 to treat certain short‑barreled weapons differently, create a federal safe harbor for people who comply with Chapter 44, preempt state taxes and registration rules, and require destruction of some National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record entries. - Owners who follow federal Chapter 44 rules would be regarded as meeting any state or local registration or licensing requirement for short‑barreled rifles and shotguns. - States and localities would be barred from imposing taxes other than general sales or use taxes, or from requiring markings, recordkeeping, or registration for short‑barreled rifles and shotguns that affect interstate commerce. - The Attorney General would have to destroy within 365 days certain NFRTR registrations and transfer and maker applications that identify owners or makers of those weapons.
HR740, Veterans’ ACCESS Act of 2025
Faster, clearer access to VA community care and mental health treatment. This bill would set measurable drive‑time and wait‑time standards for community care, tighten timelines and appeals for denials, and standardize rapid screening and admission for residential mental health programs. - Veterans and households: Veterans would get written notice of eligibility within two business days and VA would have to schedule primary, mental health, and most extended care within a 30‑minute average drive and 20 days of request. Specialty care would be scheduled within a 60‑minute drive and 28 days. - Mental health patients and families: The bill would require a standardized clinical screen within 48 hours of an admission request and admission of priority cases within 48 hours of determination. Placement must weigh veteran preferences and proximity to social supports and VA must offer accredited non‑VA options and transportation help if it cannot meet standards. - Providers and VA modernization: Provider claim deadlines would extend from 180 days to 1 year. The bill would reform the Center for Innovation with a required budget line item, create a three‑year pilot in at least five sites to allow outpatient mental health and substance use care without referrals, and require an interactive online self‑service appointment and appeals tool with a plan due in 180 days.
HRES1430, Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R.185) to advance responsible policies.
Expanded access and enforcement for victims and states to obtain unredacted Epstein-related records. This bill would let victims and state actors force production of full investigative files and adds penalties for officials who hide, alter, or destroy those records. - Victims would be able to obtain full, unredacted records and FD-302 files that identify or relate to them. Limited redactions could protect other victims' personal information and victims could seek monetary relief, injunctive relief, costs, and attorney's fees with expedited court handling. - States and state investigators would be able to sue in federal or state court to get full copies for use in investigations or proceedings. State officers could possess, review, copy, retain, and use those records under protective orders and the bill sets secure procedures for classified materials. - Department of Justice, FBI, or U.S. attorney personnel who conceal, remove, destroy, alter, withhold, or falsely certify records would face criminal penalties including fines or imprisonment under specified federal statutes.
HR9694, Epstein Files Transparency Act II
Gives victims and States new legal power to obtain full, unredacted Epstein-related records. This bill would let victims and state attorneys general sue to force release, seek damages and fees, and impose penalties on federal personnel who withhold or falsify records. - Victims would be able to sue for full, unredacted records that identify or relate to them, including FD-302 files. Courts would be required to advance these cases and could award injunctive relief, monetary relief, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees. - State attorneys general and other authorized State officers could bring actions on behalf of the State or its residents and could receive classified materials in secure facilities for investigations or prosecutions under protective procedures. A Member of Congress could obtain unredacted records within seven calendar days and seek remedies within 30 calendar days for unlawful withholding or redaction. - The bill would strip 28 CFR 16.21-16.29 from applying to requests under this law and make the Act the exclusive procedural framework for State access to covered records while preserving other legal remedies. It would also attach criminal penalties to DOJ, FBI, or U.S. Attorney personnel who conceal, destroy, falsify, or materially misrepresent covered records under existing obstruction and records statutes.
HR5811, Restoring America’s Leadership in Innovation Act of 2025
Would restore first-to-invent patent rules and a one-year grace period while overturning key post-2011 patent procedures. It would also abolish the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and push many validity fights back toward courts. - Inventors and startups would gain stronger protection from early disclosures because earlier conception and diligent reduction to practice matter again and there is a one-year grace period before filing. - Parties that challenge patents and alleged infringers would lose AIA inter partes and post-grant review paths, and the PTAB would be replaced with a Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, shifting most validity disputes toward judicial proceedings while keeping ex parte reexamination. - Patent owners and licensees would get stronger rights: patents would carry a broad presumption of validity, individual claims would be presumed valid, patent terms would be tolled during validity challenges, injunctive relief would be presumptive, and patents would be treated as transferable private property.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Treasury securities are the federal government's primary borrowing instrument — debt obligations issued by the Department of the Treasury to finance federal expenditures beyond what tax revenues cover
The Emergency Food Assistance Program TEFAP, codified at 7 U.S.C. Chapter 102, is the federal program that connects USDA-purchased food commodities with food banks, food pantries, soup kitchens, and o
Two separate but complementary federal programs protect dairy farmers against threats to their market: one funds research to expand dairy markets, the other compensates farmers when their milk or cows