2025-19715Proposed Rule

Regulators Forbidden from Shutting Bank Accounts Over Politics

Published Date: 10/30/2025

Proposed Rule

Summary

The OCC and FDIC want to stop using 'reputation risk' as a reason to punish banks or make them change their services. This means banks can’t be pressured to close accounts or drop customers just because of political or social views, or lawful but unpopular business activities. The rule is open for public comments until December 29, 2025, and aims to keep banking fair and free from biased actions.

Analyzed Economic Effects

5 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.

Banks protected from 'reputation risk' actions

The OCC and FDIC propose to forbid regulators from criticizing or taking adverse action against a bank on the basis of "reputation risk." The proposal would bar agency actions such as negative feedback in an exam, a memorandum of understanding, supervisory downgrades, denials of filings, or imposing heightened approval requirements when those actions are taken because of reputation concerns.

Customers less likely to lose bank services for beliefs

The proposed rule would prohibit the agencies from requiring, instructing, or encouraging banks to close accounts or refuse services because of a person's political, social, cultural, or religious views, constitutionally protected speech, or lawful but politically disfavored business activities. If finalized, this aims to reduce cases where banks are pressured to terminate or avoid customers for those reasons.

Potential compliance cost savings for OCC banks

The OCC estimates the proposed rule would reduce regulatory compliance burden for the 1,017 institutions it supervises and notes that 12.42 percent of Matters Requiring Attention (MRAs) in 2024 mentioned "reputation." The OCC says eliminating reputation-risk examinations could produce non-trivial cost savings for institutions that previously prepared for such reviews.

Fewer reputation-based hurdles for approvals and hires

Under the proposal, agencies could not disapprove board members, deny waivers (e.g., director citizenship or residency), or disapprove change-of-control notices solely to address reputation risk. The rule gives examples such as preventing a disapproval based on an unsubstantiated pretense where the true reason is reputation risk.

Sanctions and anti‑money‑laundering rules unchanged

The proposal explicitly does not affect requirements to prohibit or reject transactions or accounts involving Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)-sanctioned persons, entities, or jurisdictions. The agencies also state supervisors may continue BSA/anti‑money‑laundering (AML) supervision and enforcement, and the rule would bar using BSA/AML or sanctions as a pretext to pursue reputation risk.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Key Dates

Published Date
Comments Due
10/30/2025
12/29/2025

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Treasury Department
Comptroller of the Currency
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in