2026-03646Proposed Rule

EPA Speeds Up Eco-Lawsuits: Ditch Paper, Go Digital for Notices

Published Date: 2/24/2026

Proposed Rule

Summary

The EPA wants to make it easier and faster to handle citizen lawsuits about the environment by requiring people to send their Notices of Intent electronically. This change affects anyone planning to file a citizen suit under major environmental laws and aims to speed up EPA’s response without extra costs. Comments on this proposal are open until March 26, 2026, so now’s the time to speak up!

Analyzed Economic Effects

5 provisions identified: 5 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

NOIs must be filed electronically

If you plan to file a citizen suit under the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, Noise Control Act, RCRA, CERCLA, or TSCA, you will generally have to submit your Notice of Intent (NOI) electronically to the EPA via the procedure at www.epa.gov/ogc. The proposed amendments update 40 CFR parts 54, 135, 210, 254, 374, and 702 to require electronic service to the Administrator and the relevant Regional Administrator.

Electronic filing reduces filer costs

EPA states electronic service will be more convenient and less costly for NOI submitters because it avoids paper printing and certified mail costs and reduces disputes about timing. The Agency says centralizing electronic NOIs will also let EPA post them publicly more quickly, improving transparency.

Exception if electronic impracticable

If electronic service of an NOI is not practicable for you, the EPA would allow serving the NOI by certified mail, but the mailed submission must include an explanation of why electronic service is impracticable. The rule text repeats this practicability exception across the affected CFR parts.

Electronic timestamp sets service date

When you serve an NOI electronically under the proposed rules, the electronic date stamp will be treated as the date the notice was given; if you serve by mail, the return-receipt date will control. That timing determines the start of the 60-day waiting period the statutes require before most citizen suits can be filed in court.

EPA says no big burden on small entities

EPA certifies under the Regulatory Flexibility Act that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, concluding the rule imposes no net regulatory burden because it only changes the mechanism for providing NOIs. EPA also states this is an Executive Order 14192 deregulatory action meant to reduce burden.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Key Dates

Published Date
Comments Due
2/24/2026
3/26/2026

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in