FDA Fixes Typo: Heart Device Patent Gets Two Extra Months
Published Date: 3/10/2026
Notice
Summary
The FDA fixed a date typo in their earlier announcement about the AURORA EV-ICD patent review period. This update changes a deadline from February 6, 2026, to April 7, 2026, giving companies and patent holders more time to respond. If you’re involved with this medical device, this means a small but important shift in timing for patent extension decisions.
No Economic Impacts Identified for this Document
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-06478 — Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; VYLOY
The FDA has officially set the review period for VYLOY, a human biological product, so its patent holder can apply for extra patent time. This affects the company behind VYLOY, giving them a chance to extend their patent protection and potentially boost profits. If anyone thinks the dates are wrong or wants to challenge the company’s review speed, they must act by June 2 or September 30, 2026.
2026-06481 — Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; HYMPAVZI
The FDA has set the official review period for HYMPAVZI, a new human biological product, so its patent holder can apply for extra patent time. This affects the company behind HYMPAVZI and anyone interested in patent extensions. If you think the dates are wrong or want to challenge the company’s diligence, you have until June 2 or September 30, 2026, to speak up—potentially impacting patent length and market exclusivity.
2026-06480 — Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; EMRELIS
The FDA has officially set the review period for EMRELIS, a medicine patent, so the patent owner can apply for extra protection time. If anyone thinks the dates are wrong, they have until June 2, 2026, to speak up. Also, people can challenge whether the patent owner was diligent during the review by September 30, 2026. This affects patent holders and could impact how long they keep exclusive rights to their product.
2026-06479 — Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; ENFLONSIA
The FDA has set the official review period for ENFLONSIA, a human biological product, so its patent holder can apply for extra patent time. This affects the company behind ENFLONSIA and anyone interested in patent rules. If you think the dates are wrong or want to challenge the company’s review speed, you have until June 2 or September 30, 2026, to speak up—potentially impacting patent length and market exclusivity.
2026-06477 — Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; ENCELTO
The FDA has officially set the review period for ENCELTO, a medicine patent, so the company can apply to extend its patent protection. This affects the drug maker by potentially giving them more time to exclusively sell ENCELTO, which can mean more money. If anyone thinks the dates are wrong or the company wasn’t diligent, they have until June 2 or September 30, 2026, to speak up.
2026-06483 — Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; INJECTAFER
The FDA has officially set the review period for INJECTAFER, a drug patent up for extension. This means the company can apply to extend their patent protection, potentially keeping their exclusive rights longer and impacting competition and pricing. If anyone thinks the dates are wrong or the company wasn’t diligent, they can speak up by June 2 or September 30, 2026.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-04705 — Sunshine Act Meetings
The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is holding a closed meeting on March 26, 2026, to discuss a specific mine safety case involving GMS Mine Repair & Maintenance, Inc. This meeting affects the Commission and related staff, with no public access or direct cost impact. The focus is on legal questions about enforcing safety rules and past judge decisions.
Next: 2026-04702 — University of Texas at Austin; Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Training, Research, Isotopes, General Atomics Mark II Research Reactor; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
The University of Texas at Austin is getting the green light to keep running its nuclear research reactor for teaching and research. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission checked the environmental impact and found no big problems, so the license renewal is moving forward without extra costs or delays. This means students and researchers can keep using the reactor safely in Austin for years to come.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.
Already have an account? Sign in