Stopping Border Surges Act
Sponsored By: Representative Biggs (AZ)
Introduced
Summary
Tightens asylum eligibility and overhauls rules for unaccompanied children and family detention. The bill would narrow who can get asylum, shorten filing windows, mandate recordings and checklists for credible-fear and expedited-removal interviews, and expand DHS authority over detention and adjudication.
Show full summary
- Children and families: Requires specialized interviews for unaccompanied alien children and provides access to counsel at no expense to the Government. It would impose a 14-day hearing timeline for qualifying cases, require certain placement and caretaker contact information be disclosed, and mandate that specified child information be given to DHS within 90 days of enactment. It also narrows Special Immigrant Juvenile Status eligibility and clarifies that non-UAC minors may be detained only to a parent or legal guardian lawfully present.
- Asylum applicants and process: Lowers the asylum filing deadline from 1 year to 6 months. It would anchor credible-fear screenings to asylum eligibility rules, require audio or audiovisual recordings and competent interpreters, and change work-authorization timing from 180 days to 1 year with any issued employment authorization expiring 6 months after issuance. It also allows asylum termination if an asylee returns to their home country subject to a waiver for compelling reasons.
- Enforcement, fraud, and adjudication: Expands safe-third-country and internal-relocation bars, requires consideration of investigative work product in credibility determinations, and reallocates some asylum adjudicatory authority between DHS and the Attorney General. It adds a criminal penalty of up to 10 years for knowingly fraudulent asylum statements and creates a discovery-based 10-year statute of limitations for certain immigration fraud offenses.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
9 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 7 costs, 2 mixed.
Asylum deadline shorter, work permits delayed
If enacted, you would have 6 months from arrival to file for asylum (not 1 year). You would need to wait 1 year after you file to get work permission (not 180 days). Any work permit given would last only 6 months. These timing changes would delay and shorten work authorization for asylum applicants.
Harsher penalties for false asylum claims
If enacted, asylum forms would warn about penalties for false or frivolous claims. If you knowingly file a frivolous asylum case after the warning, you could be permanently ineligible for immigration benefits. You could still seek withholding of removal or protection under the torture convention. Knowingly lying or using false documents in asylum or withholding matters could bring fines or up to 10 years in prison.
Tighter asylum entry and transit rules
If enacted, only people who arrive at a U.S. port of entry could apply for asylum. People who enter elsewhere would generally be barred. DHS or the Attorney General could send some applicants to a country they passed through. You could avoid that only if you were denied protection in each transit country, were blocked by severe trafficking, or transited only countries not in key refugee and torture treaties.
New detention and placement rules for families
If enacted, DHS would have 30 days to move some unaccompanied children to HHS. Children who do not meet the statutory criteria would get a hearing within 14 days. DHS could detain families together when a parent is charged only with improper entry, and minors who are not unaccompanied could be released only to a parent or legal guardian who is lawfully present. HHS would give DHS caregiver background details, with a special 90-day reporting rule for some past placements. State licensing rules for family detention facilities would be preempted. Children would get access to counsel where practicable, at no government cost.
Asylum could end if you return
If enacted, your asylum status could end if you return to the country you fled, unless conditions there changed. DHS could waive this for a compelling reason. You could ask for a waiver before you leave or after you return.
Fewer kids qualify for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status
If enacted, fewer children could get Special Immigrant Juvenile Status. A child would be ineligible if reunification with any one parent or legal guardian is not legally barred under state law for abuse, neglect, abandonment, or similar reasons.
Longer time to charge immigration fraud
If enacted, prosecutors could bring certain immigration fraud cases up to 10 years after the fraud is discovered. This would extend the time window for charges under the listed immigration fraud statute.
Procedural shifts in asylum decision-making
If enacted, some asylum decisions would shift to DHS instead of only the Attorney General. A specific jurisdiction rule in the asylum statute would be removed. These changes would affect where and how some cases are handled.
Recorded and stricter credible fear interviews
If enacted, DHS would standardize and record expedited removal and credible fear interviews. Officers would use updated checklists and provide concise reasons for decisions. Interpreters would need to be competent and not tied to the applicant’s home-country government. Children would be interviewed by officers trained to work with child trafficking victims. The screening bar for credible fear would be tighter and tied more closely to asylum rules.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Biggs (AZ)
AZ • R
Cosponsors
Gill (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 3/11/2025
Boebert
CO • R
Sponsored 5/6/2025
Collins
GA • R
Sponsored 5/8/2025
Gosar
AZ • R
Sponsored 6/20/2025
Nehls
TX • R
Sponsored 8/19/2025
Fry
SC • R
Sponsored 8/19/2025
Roy
TX • R
Sponsored 8/22/2025
Davidson
OH • R
Sponsored 9/4/2025
Cline
VA • R
Sponsored 9/17/2025
Grothman
WI • R
Sponsored 10/10/2025
Barr
KY • R
Sponsored 10/10/2025
Hunt
TX • R
Sponsored 10/14/2025
Cloud
TX • R
Sponsored 10/17/2025
Biggs (SC)
SC • R
Sponsored 10/21/2025
Donalds
FL • R
Sponsored 10/24/2025
Fine
FL • R
Sponsored 10/24/2025
Miller (IL)
IL • R
Sponsored 12/12/2025
Jack
GA • R
Sponsored 12/16/2025
Mace
SC • R
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Steube
FL • R
Sponsored 1/20/2026
Moore (WV)
WV • R
Sponsored 1/22/2026
Pfluger
TX • R
Sponsored 2/11/2026
Self
TX • R
Sponsored 2/11/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR925 — Dismantle DEI Act of 2025
Bans many federal Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices across the federal government. The bill would define a narrow set of "prohibited DEI practices," require agencies to end DEI offices and related programs, and block similar DEI requirements for contractors, grantees, accrediting bodies, and parts of the military and financial regulators.
HR425 — Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act
Ends the Corporate Transparency Act and removes its amendments from federal law. It also adjusts related U.S. Code citations and parts of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 to reflect that repeal. - Repeals the Corporate Transparency Act as title LXIV of division F of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283) and removes all amendments made by that Act. - Edits Title 31, United States Code by removing or changing cross-references that mentioned section 5336 and updating references in sections 5321 and 5322. - Alters the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 by repealing section 6502 and striking or modifying portions of section 6509 as described in the bill.
HR569 — Birthright Citizenship Act of 2025
Restrict who counts as "subject to the jurisdiction" for birthright citizenship by tying it to parents' legal status. This bill would rewrite the statutory definition in 8 U.S.C. 1401 to make parental status the determining factor for whether a U.S. birth qualifies under the jurisdiction test. - Families and children: A person born in the United States would be considered subject to the jurisdiction only if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or national, a lawful permanent resident whose residence is in the United States, or an alien with lawful status who is actively serving in the armed forces. This ties eligibility to specific parental categories rather than territorial birth alone. - Noncitizen parents: Children born to parents who do not meet those listed parental statuses would not meet the statute's jurisdictional test for birthright citizenship under this framework. - Timing and grandfathering: The bill says these changes would not affect the citizenship or nationality status of anyone born before the law takes effect.
HR1241 — SAFE for America Act of 2025
This bill would eliminate the Diversity Visa (DV) program from the Immigration and Nationality Act. It would remove the statutory basis for the DV lottery and revise many cross-references in immigration law to reflect that removal, with the changes taking effect on October 1, 2025. - Prospective diversity-visa applicants. People who would have used the DV lottery lose that pathway to permanent residence after the effective date. - Federal immigration agencies and legal practitioners. The bill redesignates subsections and updates cross-references across several INA provisions, including sections 101, 201, 203, 204, 214, 216, and 245, so the statute reads consistently without the DV program.
HR38 — Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
National concealed-carry reciprocity. This bill would create nationwide recognition of state concealed-carry licenses so people with a valid photo ID and a state permit or the right to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in many other States. - Gun owners and travelers: People not federally prohibited from firearms possession who hold a state concealed-carry license or are entitled to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in States that issue permits or do not ban concealed carry. Machine guns and destructive devices are excluded. It would take effect 90 days after enactment. - State and property rights: States would keep the power to prohibit or restrict concealed carry on private property and on State or local government property. The bill also lists federal public lands and agencies where carrying would be allowed in publicly accessible areas, including National Park units and Forest Service land. - Criminal and civil protections: Officers may not arrest absent probable cause that the carry falls outside the law and prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt when the defense is raised. Prevailing defendants can recover reasonable attorney fees and may sue for deprivation of rights with damages.
HR2705 — Nuclear Family Priority Act
Refocuses family-based immigration to prioritize spouses and children. The bill would narrow who counts as an immediate relative, rewrite family-sponsored categories, change annual visa limits and country allocation rules, and create a limited parent visa. - Families and sponsors: Would redefine "immediate relatives" to include only spouses and children of U.S. citizens or permanent residents and would limit family-preference visas to spouses and children of lawful permanent residents. It also changes age rules so some younger applicants can be adjudicated as children for visa purposes. - Parents of adult U.S. citizens: Would create a new W nonimmigrant visa for parents of U.S. citizens aged 21 or older. Admissions would be up to 5 years, with no work authorization, no eligibility for public benefits, and the U.S. citizen child must arrange health insurance at no cost to the parent. - Visa supply and country caps: Would set the annual family-sponsored level at 88,000 minus a computed adjustment and restructure per-country limits so 75% of family visas are issued without country caps and the remainder are allocated under country ceilings.
Previous / Next Bills
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in