HR116119th Congress

Stopping Border Surges Act

Sponsored By: Representative Biggs (AZ)

Introduced

Summary

Tightens asylum eligibility and overhauls rules for unaccompanied children and family detention. The bill would narrow who can get asylum, shorten filing windows, mandate recordings and checklists for credible-fear and expedited-removal interviews, and expand DHS authority over detention and adjudication.

Show full summary
  • Children and families: Requires specialized interviews for unaccompanied alien children and provides access to counsel at no expense to the Government. It would impose a 14-day hearing timeline for qualifying cases, require certain placement and caretaker contact information be disclosed, and mandate that specified child information be given to DHS within 90 days of enactment. It also narrows Special Immigrant Juvenile Status eligibility and clarifies that non-UAC minors may be detained only to a parent or legal guardian lawfully present.
  • Asylum applicants and process: Lowers the asylum filing deadline from 1 year to 6 months. It would anchor credible-fear screenings to asylum eligibility rules, require audio or audiovisual recordings and competent interpreters, and change work-authorization timing from 180 days to 1 year with any issued employment authorization expiring 6 months after issuance. It also allows asylum termination if an asylee returns to their home country subject to a waiver for compelling reasons.
  • Enforcement, fraud, and adjudication: Expands safe-third-country and internal-relocation bars, requires consideration of investigative work product in credibility determinations, and reallocates some asylum adjudicatory authority between DHS and the Attorney General. It adds a criminal penalty of up to 10 years for knowingly fraudulent asylum statements and creates a discovery-based 10-year statute of limitations for certain immigration fraud offenses.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

9 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 7 costs, 2 mixed.

Asylum deadline shorter, work permits delayed

If enacted, you would have 6 months from arrival to file for asylum (not 1 year). You would need to wait 1 year after you file to get work permission (not 180 days). Any work permit given would last only 6 months. These timing changes would delay and shorten work authorization for asylum applicants.

Harsher penalties for false asylum claims

If enacted, asylum forms would warn about penalties for false or frivolous claims. If you knowingly file a frivolous asylum case after the warning, you could be permanently ineligible for immigration benefits. You could still seek withholding of removal or protection under the torture convention. Knowingly lying or using false documents in asylum or withholding matters could bring fines or up to 10 years in prison.

Tighter asylum entry and transit rules

If enacted, only people who arrive at a U.S. port of entry could apply for asylum. People who enter elsewhere would generally be barred. DHS or the Attorney General could send some applicants to a country they passed through. You could avoid that only if you were denied protection in each transit country, were blocked by severe trafficking, or transited only countries not in key refugee and torture treaties.

New detention and placement rules for families

If enacted, DHS would have 30 days to move some unaccompanied children to HHS. Children who do not meet the statutory criteria would get a hearing within 14 days. DHS could detain families together when a parent is charged only with improper entry, and minors who are not unaccompanied could be released only to a parent or legal guardian who is lawfully present. HHS would give DHS caregiver background details, with a special 90-day reporting rule for some past placements. State licensing rules for family detention facilities would be preempted. Children would get access to counsel where practicable, at no government cost.

Asylum could end if you return

If enacted, your asylum status could end if you return to the country you fled, unless conditions there changed. DHS could waive this for a compelling reason. You could ask for a waiver before you leave or after you return.

Fewer kids qualify for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status

If enacted, fewer children could get Special Immigrant Juvenile Status. A child would be ineligible if reunification with any one parent or legal guardian is not legally barred under state law for abuse, neglect, abandonment, or similar reasons.

Longer time to charge immigration fraud

If enacted, prosecutors could bring certain immigration fraud cases up to 10 years after the fraud is discovered. This would extend the time window for charges under the listed immigration fraud statute.

Procedural shifts in asylum decision-making

If enacted, some asylum decisions would shift to DHS instead of only the Attorney General. A specific jurisdiction rule in the asylum statute would be removed. These changes would affect where and how some cases are handled.

Recorded and stricter credible fear interviews

If enacted, DHS would standardize and record expedited removal and credible fear interviews. Officers would use updated checklists and provide concise reasons for decisions. Interpreters would need to be competent and not tied to the applicant’s home-country government. Children would be interviewed by officers trained to work with child trafficking victims. The screening bar for credible fear would be tighter and tied more closely to asylum rules.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Biggs (AZ)

AZ • R

Cosponsors

  • Gill (TX)

    TX • R

    Sponsored 3/11/2025

  • Boebert

    CO • R

    Sponsored 5/6/2025

  • Collins

    GA • R

    Sponsored 5/8/2025

  • Gosar

    AZ • R

    Sponsored 6/20/2025

  • Nehls

    TX • R

    Sponsored 8/19/2025

  • Fry

    SC • R

    Sponsored 8/19/2025

  • Roy

    TX • R

    Sponsored 8/22/2025

  • Davidson

    OH • R

    Sponsored 9/4/2025

  • Cline

    VA • R

    Sponsored 9/17/2025

  • Grothman

    WI • R

    Sponsored 10/10/2025

  • Barr

    KY • R

    Sponsored 10/10/2025

  • Hunt

    TX • R

    Sponsored 10/14/2025

  • Cloud

    TX • R

    Sponsored 10/17/2025

  • Biggs (SC)

    SC • R

    Sponsored 10/21/2025

  • Donalds

    FL • R

    Sponsored 10/24/2025

  • Fine

    FL • R

    Sponsored 10/24/2025

  • Miller (IL)

    IL • R

    Sponsored 12/12/2025

  • Jack

    GA • R

    Sponsored 12/16/2025

  • Mace

    SC • R

    Sponsored 12/17/2025

  • Steube

    FL • R

    Sponsored 1/20/2026

  • Moore (WV)

    WV • R

    Sponsored 1/22/2026

  • Pfluger

    TX • R

    Sponsored 2/11/2026

  • Self

    TX • R

    Sponsored 2/11/2026

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov

Related Bills

Previous / Next Bills

Back to Legislation

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.

Already have an account? Sign in