PLUS for Veterans Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Bergman
In Committee
Summary
This bill would tighten and standardize how agents, attorneys, and organizations represent veterans on VA claims by capping fees, requiring disclosures, and increasing penalties for improper charging. It also clarifies that giving a medical exam or completing the related report is not the same as preparing a claim for purposes of these rules.
Show full summary
- Veterans and claimants would get clearer protections. The bill would cap flat fees for initial claims at the lesser of $12,500 or five times the monthly benefit increase, require a standard fee form, bar fee collection before an initial decision, and confirm the option to pick a private physician for exams.
- People who want recognition as agents or attorneys would face a formal application process with mail, fax, or electronic options. The bill would allow conditional recognition if background checks take longer than 90 days, permit one-year temporary recognition and further one-year extensions, and require reporting on suspensions or denials by representative type.
- Oversight, money, and penalties would be strengthened. The Secretary could assess applicants who charge fees with assessments up to $500 to fund administration. The bill would reinstate criminal and civil penalties for unauthorized fees, add enhanced penalties during conditional recognition including a $50,000 fine and possible bars from recognition, and deposit fines into a revolving fund. The bill would also preempt any state laws that conflict with these federal rights.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
7 provisions identified: 6 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
Fee caps for veterans' initial claims
If enacted, you could not be asked to pay before the VA’s initial decision on your claim. Any fee would have to depend on a win for you. The total fee could not exceed the lesser of $12,500 or five times your monthly benefit increase. The $12,500 cap would adjust each Oct. 1 for inflation starting the first fiscal year after enactment. You would also get a standard notice about free help, your right to choose your own doctor for exams, and a ban on referrals to doctors with business ties to your representative.
Heavy penalties for violations by temporary reps
If enacted, the VA would revoke conditional recognition after notice when a temporary representative breaks VA laws or rules. After notice and a chance to be heard, that person could be fined $50,000. They would be barred for one year for a first violation and 10 years for later ones.
Criminal ban on unauthorized VA fees
If enacted, it would be a crime to ask for or take fees for VA claim help unless the law allows it. Violators could face fines, up to one year in jail, or both. This would take effect 90 days after the VA issues required rules.
Federal rules override conflicting state laws
If enacted, this Act would supersede any state law that conflicts with the rights it creates. States could not enforce rules that block these federal protections, whether old or new.
Medical exams not claim preparation
If enacted, giving or reporting a required medical exam would not count as preparing or prosecuting a claim. This would keep exam duties separate from representation rules.
VA must issue rules and annual reports
If enacted, the VA would have 180 days after enactment to issue rules for these changes. The VA would also report to Congress one year after enactment and every year after on suspensions and denials, with reasons and rep type.
New rules and $500 fee for paid reps
If enacted, agents and attorneys could apply for VA recognition by mail, fax, or online. If the VA cannot verify qualifications in 90 days, the VA would grant one-year conditional recognition and renew it yearly until verification. The VA could charge an assessment, capped at $500, for applicants who charge or collect fees; money would fund the program. The VA could not punish someone only for fee-charging that happened before enactment. Not keeping claimant data secure under HIPAA could be grounds to suspend or deny recognition.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Bergman
MI • R
Cosponsors
Correa
CA • D
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Miller-Meeks
IA • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Rouzer
NC • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Webster (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
McDowell
NC • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Harrigan
NC • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Alford
MO • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Lawler
NY • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Meuser
PA • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
McCormick
GA • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Hudson
NC • R
Sponsored 3/4/2025
LaLota
NY • R
Sponsored 3/10/2025
Van Orden
WI • R
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Harris (NC)
NC • R
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Wagner
MO • R
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Gimenez
FL • R
Sponsored 3/25/2025
Nunn (IA)
IA • R
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Kustoff
TN • R
Sponsored 4/24/2025
Huizenga
MI • R
Sponsored 4/24/2025
Evans (CO)
CO • R
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR452 — Miracle on Ice Congressional Gold Medal Act
This law awards Congressional Gold Medals to the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team as a formal recognition of their Lake Placid victory and its lasting effect on American morale and the sport of hockey. It directs the Treasury to strike the medals and sets rules for duplicates, display, and funding. - Team legacy and public recognition: The Act honors the 1980 team with a symbolic national award that reinforces their historical and cultural significance for fans, players, and communities connected to the game. - Museum displays and research access: One gold medal goes to the Lake Placid Olympic Center, one to the United States Hockey Hall of Fame Museum in Eveleth, Minnesota, and one to the United States Olympic & Paralympic Museum in Colorado Springs for display and research. - Mint operations and collectibles: The Secretary of the Treasury will strike the medals, may sell bronze duplicates at prices that cover costs, and classifies the medals as national and numismatic items. The U.S. Mint Public Enterprise Fund pays for production and receives proceeds from duplicate sales.
HR3132 — CHOICE for Veterans Act of 2025
Creates regulated accreditation and fee limits for people who help veterans file VA benefits claims. It would set a national recognition system for agents, attorneys, and organizations, standardize fee agreements, and expand claimants' access to no-cost accredited help. - Veterans and families: Veterans would get a public, quarterly-updated list of accredited representatives and an online warning about fees. The VA must point claimants to recognized organizations that offer no-cost claim preparation. - Representatives: Agents and attorneys would need formal recognition and a knowledge test and must meet higher continuing education requirements. The VA could grant temporary recognition and charge an assessment of up to $500 for recognition applications. - Oversight and penalties: The VA would gain audit authority and must report annually to Congress while the Government Accountability Office would review the recognition process. The bill creates civil and criminal-like penalties, requires revocation for violators, and sets a $50,000 penalty for repeat offenses.
HR979 — AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act of 2025
This bill would require AM broadcast capability to be installed as standard equipment in passenger motor vehicles. It focuses on driver-accessible AM reception, allows digital AM audio to count for compliance, and links vehicle AM capability to emergency alerting through IPAWS. - Drivers and households: Built-in, driver-accessible AM reception would make it easier for people to get local AM stations and emergency alerts from their vehicles. The bill allows devices that receive digital AM to meet the requirement. - Vehicle manufacturers: The Department of Transportation would need to issue a rule within 1 year, with a general compliance deadline no later than 2 years after the rule is issued. Small manufacturers that produced no more than 40,000 passenger vehicles in 2022 would get at least 4 years to comply. - Oversight and emergency systems: States would be barred from imposing their own AM-access rules. The bill mandates interim labels and pricing protections for cars without AM, authorizes civil penalties and DOJ injunctions for violations, requires a GAO study and a congressional briefing within 1 year, and includes an 8-year sunset for the authority.
HR703 — Main Street Tax Certainty Act
This bill would permanently preserve the qualified business income (QBI) deduction by removing the sunset provision in Internal Revenue Code section 199A. The change would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, so the deduction would be available for 2026 and later tax years. It achieves this by striking subsection (i) of section 199A and setting that effective date. Taxpayers with qualified business income would continue to claim the QBI deduction under the existing Section 199A rules for those years.
HRES719 — Honoring the life and legacy of Charles "Charlie" James Kirk.
Condemns political violence. The resolution condemns the assassination of Charles 'Charlie' James Kirk, honors his life and leadership, and urges swift justice while offering sympathy to his family.
HR842 — Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act
Would expand Medicare to cover multi-cancer early detection screening tests. It defines eligible tests as certain FDA-cleared or approved genomic blood tests or comparable biological-sample tests and directs the Secretary to use the national coverage determinations process to decide when they are covered.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in