HR1656119th CongressWALLET

PLUS for Veterans Act of 2025

Sponsored By: Representative Bergman

In Committee

Summary

This bill would tighten and standardize how agents, attorneys, and organizations represent veterans on VA claims by capping fees, requiring disclosures, and increasing penalties for improper charging. It also clarifies that giving a medical exam or completing the related report is not the same as preparing a claim for purposes of these rules.

Show full summary
  • Veterans and claimants would get clearer protections. The bill would cap flat fees for initial claims at the lesser of $12,500 or five times the monthly benefit increase, require a standard fee form, bar fee collection before an initial decision, and confirm the option to pick a private physician for exams.
  • People who want recognition as agents or attorneys would face a formal application process with mail, fax, or electronic options. The bill would allow conditional recognition if background checks take longer than 90 days, permit one-year temporary recognition and further one-year extensions, and require reporting on suspensions or denials by representative type.
  • Oversight, money, and penalties would be strengthened. The Secretary could assess applicants who charge fees with assessments up to $500 to fund administration. The bill would reinstate criminal and civil penalties for unauthorized fees, add enhanced penalties during conditional recognition including a $50,000 fine and possible bars from recognition, and deposit fines into a revolving fund. The bill would also preempt any state laws that conflict with these federal rights.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

7 provisions identified: 6 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.

Fee caps for veterans' initial claims

If enacted, you could not be asked to pay before the VA’s initial decision on your claim. Any fee would have to depend on a win for you. The total fee could not exceed the lesser of $12,500 or five times your monthly benefit increase. The $12,500 cap would adjust each Oct. 1 for inflation starting the first fiscal year after enactment. You would also get a standard notice about free help, your right to choose your own doctor for exams, and a ban on referrals to doctors with business ties to your representative.

Heavy penalties for violations by temporary reps

If enacted, the VA would revoke conditional recognition after notice when a temporary representative breaks VA laws or rules. After notice and a chance to be heard, that person could be fined $50,000. They would be barred for one year for a first violation and 10 years for later ones.

Criminal ban on unauthorized VA fees

If enacted, it would be a crime to ask for or take fees for VA claim help unless the law allows it. Violators could face fines, up to one year in jail, or both. This would take effect 90 days after the VA issues required rules.

Federal rules override conflicting state laws

If enacted, this Act would supersede any state law that conflicts with the rights it creates. States could not enforce rules that block these federal protections, whether old or new.

Medical exams not claim preparation

If enacted, giving or reporting a required medical exam would not count as preparing or prosecuting a claim. This would keep exam duties separate from representation rules.

VA must issue rules and annual reports

If enacted, the VA would have 180 days after enactment to issue rules for these changes. The VA would also report to Congress one year after enactment and every year after on suspensions and denials, with reasons and rep type.

New rules and $500 fee for paid reps

If enacted, agents and attorneys could apply for VA recognition by mail, fax, or online. If the VA cannot verify qualifications in 90 days, the VA would grant one-year conditional recognition and renew it yearly until verification. The VA could charge an assessment, capped at $500, for applicants who charge or collect fees; money would fund the program. The VA could not punish someone only for fee-charging that happened before enactment. Not keeping claimant data secure under HIPAA could be grounds to suspend or deny recognition.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Bergman

MI • R

Cosponsors

  • Correa

    CA • D

    Sponsored 2/27/2025

  • Miller-Meeks

    IA • R

    Sponsored 2/27/2025

  • Rouzer

    NC • R

    Sponsored 2/27/2025

  • Webster (FL)

    FL • R

    Sponsored 2/27/2025

  • McDowell

    NC • R

    Sponsored 2/27/2025

  • Harrigan

    NC • R

    Sponsored 2/27/2025

  • Alford

    MO • R

    Sponsored 2/27/2025

  • Lawler

    NY • R

    Sponsored 3/3/2025

  • Meuser

    PA • R

    Sponsored 3/3/2025

  • McCormick

    GA • R

    Sponsored 3/3/2025

  • Hudson

    NC • R

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • LaLota

    NY • R

    Sponsored 3/10/2025

  • Van Orden

    WI • R

    Sponsored 3/21/2025

  • Harris (NC)

    NC • R

    Sponsored 3/21/2025

  • Wagner

    MO • R

    Sponsored 3/21/2025

  • Gimenez

    FL • R

    Sponsored 3/25/2025

  • Nunn (IA)

    IA • R

    Sponsored 3/27/2025

  • Kustoff

    TN • R

    Sponsored 4/24/2025

  • Huizenga

    MI • R

    Sponsored 4/24/2025

  • Evans (CO)

    CO • R

    Sponsored 10/3/2025

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov

Related Bills

Back to Legislation

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.

Already have an account? Sign in