CHOICE for Veterans Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Bergman
In Committee
Summary
Creates regulated accreditation and fee limits for people who help veterans file VA benefits claims. It would set a national recognition system for agents, attorneys, and organizations, standardize fee agreements, and expand claimants' access to no-cost accredited help.
Show full summary
- Veterans and families: Veterans would get a public, quarterly-updated list of accredited representatives and an online warning about fees. The VA must point claimants to recognized organizations that offer no-cost claim preparation.
- Representatives: Agents and attorneys would need formal recognition and a knowledge test and must meet higher continuing education requirements. The VA could grant temporary recognition and charge an assessment of up to $500 for recognition applications.
- Oversight and penalties: The VA would gain audit authority and must report annually to Congress while the Government Accountability Office would review the recognition process. The bill creates civil and criminal-like penalties, requires revocation for violators, and sets a $50,000 penalty for repeat offenses.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
8 provisions identified: 5 benefits, 1 costs, 2 mixed.
Find accredited, no-cost VA claim help
If enacted, the VA would have to tell unrepresented claimants about free, accredited help. The VA would keep a public online list of accredited helpers and update it at least every quarter. Claim portals would show fee warnings and links to that list. You could also report unaccredited preparers and any fees they charged.
Federal rules override conflicting state laws
If enacted, the bill’s federal rules would override any state law that conflicts with them. States could not enforce rules that undercut the rights this bill creates.
New fee limits for VA claims
If enacted, you would see new rules on fees for VA claims. Fees must be contingency-only and may not be more than the lower of $12,500 or five times your monthly benefit increase. If fees are higher than your past‑due award, the representative would have to offer installments, with each payment no more than your monthly increase. Representatives could not charge in some cases, like presumptive service‑connection claims, claims filed on active duty, certain delays they caused, or when the same organization already charged you. The cap would also rise each October 1 with inflation (CPI).
Pension date extended to April 2032
If enacted, a VA pension payment limit date would move from November 30, 2031 to April 30, 2032. This would keep the current rule in place a few months longer.
More oversight of VA recognition program
If enacted, VA and GAO would review and report on how VA recognizes agents and attorneys. VA would finish its own review within 180 days and send recommendations to Congress. GAO would report within one year with findings and suggested fixes. VA would also report to Congress each year on denials, suspensions, and penalties, with reasons.
Criminal ban on unauthorized claim fees
If enacted, it would be a crime to charge or try to charge VA claim fees unless the law allows it. Penalties could include a fine under federal law, up to one year in jail, or both. The VA would define what “preparation, presentation, or prosecution” of a claim means within 90 days, and the new penalty rules would start 180 days after those regulations are issued. The ban would not cover independent medical exams with no business tie to a recognized representative.
Stronger penalties for rule-breaking representatives
If enacted, conditionally recognized representatives who break VA rules could lose recognition and face steep penalties. Each violation could bring a $50,000 fine, a 1‑year bar the first time, and a 10‑year bar after that. The VA would also add new misconduct rules, like poor data security, selling personal data, steering clients to doctors they have business ties with, or using overseas call centers for claim work.
New recognition rules and application fee
If enacted, people seeking VA recognition to help with claims would face new steps. The VA would post an on‑demand knowledge test within 180 days and raise continuing education rules within one year. If VA cannot verify qualifications in 180 days, applicants would get one year of conditional recognition, with 180‑day extensions until verification is done. The VA could charge an application assessment up to $500 to those who plan to charge fees. VA could not deny recognition just for past fee‑charging or for being a nonprofit employee acting in that role.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Bergman
MI • R
Cosponsors
Bost
IL • R
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Self
TX • R
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Van Orden
WI • R
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Harris (NC)
NC • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Alford
MO • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Van Drew
NJ • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Rouzer
NC • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Miller-Meeks
IA • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Newhouse
WA • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Franklin, Scott
FL • R
Sponsored 5/7/2025
Kelly (PA)
PA • R
Sponsored 5/7/2025
DesJarlais
TN • R
Sponsored 5/7/2025
LaLota
NY • R
Sponsored 6/2/2025
Moore (NC)
NC • R
Sponsored 6/12/2025
Rose
TN • R
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Moore (AL)
AL • R
Sponsored 7/29/2025
Edwards
NC • R
Sponsored 8/5/2025
Webster (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 8/26/2025
Nunn (IA)
IA • R
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Kustoff
TN • R
Sponsored 9/10/2025
James
MI • R
Sponsored 9/10/2025
Calvert
CA • R
Sponsored 9/19/2025
Salazar
FL • R
Sponsored 9/26/2025
Lawler
NY • R
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Evans (CO)
CO • R
Sponsored 10/3/2025
McCormick
GA • R
Sponsored 10/8/2025
Crawford
AR • R
Sponsored 10/10/2025
Meuser
PA • R
Sponsored 10/10/2025
Steil
WI • R
Sponsored 10/17/2025
Smucker
PA • R
Sponsored 10/24/2025
Burchett
TN • R
Sponsored 10/24/2025
Miller (OH)
OH • R
Sponsored 10/28/2025
Harrigan
NC • R
Sponsored 10/28/2025
Huizenga
MI • R
Sponsored 10/31/2025
McDowell
NC • R
Sponsored 10/31/2025
Kelly (MS)
MS • R
Sponsored 10/31/2025
Wagner
MO • R
Sponsored 11/4/2025
Crenshaw
TX • R
Sponsored 12/1/2025
McCaul
TX • R
Sponsored 12/2/2025
Stauber
MN • R
Sponsored 12/2/2025
Hudson
NC • R
Sponsored 12/5/2025
Ogles
TN • R
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Dunn (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Bice
OK • R
Sponsored 2/9/2026
Wied
WI • R
Sponsored 2/9/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR703 — Main Street Tax Certainty Act
This bill would permanently preserve the qualified business income (QBI) deduction by removing the sunset provision in Internal Revenue Code section 199A. The change would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, so the deduction would be available for 2026 and later tax years. It achieves this by striking subsection (i) of section 199A and setting that effective date. Taxpayers with qualified business income would continue to claim the QBI deduction under the existing Section 199A rules for those years.
HR452 — Miracle on Ice Congressional Gold Medal Act
This law awards Congressional Gold Medals to the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team as a formal recognition of their Lake Placid victory and its lasting effect on American morale and the sport of hockey. It directs the Treasury to strike the medals and sets rules for duplicates, display, and funding. - Team legacy and public recognition: The Act honors the 1980 team with a symbolic national award that reinforces their historical and cultural significance for fans, players, and communities connected to the game. - Museum displays and research access: One gold medal goes to the Lake Placid Olympic Center, one to the United States Hockey Hall of Fame Museum in Eveleth, Minnesota, and one to the United States Olympic & Paralympic Museum in Colorado Springs for display and research. - Mint operations and collectibles: The Secretary of the Treasury will strike the medals, may sell bronze duplicates at prices that cover costs, and classifies the medals as national and numismatic items. The U.S. Mint Public Enterprise Fund pays for production and receives proceeds from duplicate sales.
HR909 — Crime Victims Fund Stabilization Act of 2025
Would make the False Claims Act apply to deposits to the Crime Victims Fund through FY2029. It would also require an Inspector General audit that sets the audit's scope, timing, and recipients, and the measure is titled the Crime Victims Fund Stabilization Act of 2025. - Entities that make deposits to the Crime Victims Fund would be subject to the False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3729–3731) for deposits from enactment through FY2029. - An Inspector General audit would examine the Crime Victims Fund and the bill would set the audit's scope, timing, and who receives the report.
HRES719 — Honoring the life and legacy of Charles "Charlie" James Kirk.
Condemns political violence. The resolution condemns the assassination of Charles 'Charlie' James Kirk, honors his life and leadership, and urges swift justice while offering sympathy to his family.
HR1301 — Death Tax Repeal Act
This bill would repeal the federal estate tax and the generation‑skipping transfer tax. It would also reshape gift tax rules by keeping tiered rates but creating a $10 million lifetime exemption indexed for inflation. - Heirs of people who die on or after enactment would not owe the federal estate tax. This removes that tax from those estates. - Donors and high‑net‑worth individuals would still face a gift tax, but under a tiered schedule from 18% to 35% and a $10 million lifetime exemption that is indexed for inflation after 2011. - Generation‑skipping transfers made on or after enactment would not be subject to the GST tax. Qualified domestic trusts for surviving spouses of decedents who died before enactment would follow transitional rules, including changed treatment of distributions after a 10‑year period beginning on the enactment date.
HR38 — Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
National concealed-carry reciprocity. This bill would create nationwide recognition of state concealed-carry licenses so people with a valid photo ID and a state permit or the right to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in many other States. - Gun owners and travelers: People not federally prohibited from firearms possession who hold a state concealed-carry license or are entitled to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in States that issue permits or do not ban concealed carry. Machine guns and destructive devices are excluded. It would take effect 90 days after enactment. - State and property rights: States would keep the power to prohibit or restrict concealed carry on private property and on State or local government property. The bill also lists federal public lands and agencies where carrying would be allowed in publicly accessible areas, including National Park units and Forest Service land. - Criminal and civil protections: Officers may not arrest absent probable cause that the carry falls outside the law and prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt when the defense is raised. Prevailing defendants can recover reasonable attorney fees and may sue for deprivation of rights with damages.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in