Law Enforcement Protection and Privacy Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Higgins (LA)
Introduced
Summary
Protecting firearm trace data by exempting ATF trace records from public disclosure and creating civil penalties and a private lawsuit path for unlawful disclosures. This bill would add a new FOIA exemption for the ATF’s Firearms Trace System and for certain dealer records under 18 U.S.C. 923.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
4 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 0 costs, 2 mixed.
Licensed gun dealers could sue over leaks
If enacted, federally licensed firearm businesses could sue over unlawful disclosures of protected records. Courts could award the greater of triple damages (including lost income or reputational harm) or $25,000 per disclosed item, plus possible punitive damages and attorney’s fees. The Attorney General could fine non‑federal entities $10,000 per item for a first violation or if the last violation was over 3 years ago, or $25,000 per item otherwise. Fines would be per disclosure, could be collected in court, and a $25,000‑tier penalty would trigger a 1‑year loss of access to protected info. Civil fines would apply to disclosures after enactment; the right to sue would begin on enactment.
FOIA shield for firearm trace records
The bill would add a FOIA exemption for ATF firearm trace data and certain licensee records. Agencies could deny FOIA requests for the Firearms Trace System and for records dealers must keep or report under federal law. This would reduce public access to those records, while shielding sensitive trace and dealer information. The exemption would take effect upon enactment.
Keeps other legal remedies available
The bill would not block any other legal remedies. If a court strikes part of the Act, the rest would still apply. These rules would take effect upon enactment.
Who and what counts as protected info
The bill would define key terms. It would name the covered disclosure statute, adopt the federal definition of agency, and define local entities. It would define protected information to include the ATF Firearms Trace System and dealer records that must be kept or reported. These definitions would determine who can be sued or fined and which records are protected. They would take effect upon enactment.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Higgins (LA)
LA • R
Cosponsors
Weber (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Babin
TX • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Schmidt
KS • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Fleischmann
TN • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Collins
GA • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Gill (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Rutherford
FL • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Harris (MD)
MD • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Messmer
IN • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Moore (AL)
AL • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Yakym
IN • R
Sponsored 3/11/2025
Sessions
TX • R
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Crenshaw
TX • R
Sponsored 6/3/2025
Harshbarger
TN • R
Sponsored 6/3/2025
DesJarlais
TN • R
Sponsored 8/22/2025
Langworthy
NY • R
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Miller (OH)
OH • R
Sponsored 9/8/2025
Jackson (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Nehls
TX • R
Sponsored 10/6/2025
Rogers (AL)
AL • R
Sponsored 11/17/2025
Jack
GA • R
Sponsored 12/19/2025
Grothman
WI • R
Sponsored 2/3/2026
Gooden
TX • R
Sponsored 2/26/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR1181 — Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act
Stops payment systems from assigning merchant codes that single out firearms sellers. This bill would prohibit payment card networks and covered entities from requiring or assigning merchant category codes that identify a retailer as selling firearms, ammunition, accessories, or firearm components. - Firearms retailers: Businesses could not be assigned MCCs that are used only or primarily for firearms retailers, which limits one way transactions could be labeled. - Payment card networks and covered entities: Networks and processors would be barred from requiring merchants to use or from assigning MCCs that identify a business as a firearms retailer. - Federal enforcement and oversight: The Attorney General would set up a complaint process within 90 days after enactment, investigate complaints, demand remediation within 30 days, and may seek federal injunctions. The bill would preempt state and local rules on assigning or disclosing these MCCs while allowing narrow fraud and security compliance exceptions and require annual reports to Congress on investigations and effectiveness.
HR45 — FIND Act
Prevents federal contractors from excluding or limiting businesses in the firearm and ammunition industry. The bill would create a new procurement rule that requires prime contractors and many subcontractors to certify they have no policies that discriminate against defined firearm entities or firearm trade associations. - Firearm and ammunition businesses and trade associations: Would block contractors from refusing services, limiting operations beyond law, or making category-based exclusions against defined firearm entities or trade groups. - Prime contractors and subcontractors: Prime contractors must include a no-discrimination certification and may not award a first-tier subcontract worth more than 10 percent of the prime contract to an uncertified entity. The bill bans structuring tiers to evade that limit. - Federal agencies: Agency contracting officials would be required to add the certification and subcontract limits into procurement contracts for goods and services. A narrow sole-source exception is included. - Enforcement: A contractor that violates the clause would face termination for default and initiation of suspension or debarment proceedings.
HR38 — Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
National concealed-carry reciprocity. This bill would create nationwide recognition of state concealed-carry licenses so people with a valid photo ID and a state permit or the right to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in many other States. - Gun owners and travelers: People not federally prohibited from firearms possession who hold a state concealed-carry license or are entitled to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in States that issue permits or do not ban concealed carry. Machine guns and destructive devices are excluded. It would take effect 90 days after enactment. - State and property rights: States would keep the power to prohibit or restrict concealed carry on private property and on State or local government property. The bill also lists federal public lands and agencies where carrying would be allowed in publicly accessible areas, including National Park units and Forest Service land. - Criminal and civil protections: Officers may not arrest absent probable cause that the carry falls outside the law and prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt when the defense is raised. Prevailing defendants can recover reasonable attorney fees and may sue for deprivation of rights with damages.
HR404 — Hearing Protection Act
This bill would reclassify firearm silencers under federal law by removing them from the National Firearms Act's definition of “firearm” and creating a parallel federal licensing and tax framework. It would also preempt state and local silencer taxes and require destruction of prior federal silencer records. - Owners and buyers: People acquiring or possessing silencers would be subject to a federal licensing and registration regime under Chapter 44 of Title 18, even as silencers are taken out of the NFA firearm definition. - State and local governments: Would be barred from imposing taxes, special registration, marking, or recordkeeping on silencers beyond ordinary sales or use taxes. - Records and industry rules: Would require destruction of existing silencer entries in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record within 365 days, mandate serial-number marking on silencers, and add a 10 percent federal excise tax on silencers sold by manufacturers or importers.
HR1301 — Death Tax Repeal Act
This bill would repeal the federal estate tax and the generation‑skipping transfer tax. It would also reshape gift tax rules by keeping tiered rates but creating a $10 million lifetime exemption indexed for inflation. - Heirs of people who die on or after enactment would not owe the federal estate tax. This removes that tax from those estates. - Donors and high‑net‑worth individuals would still face a gift tax, but under a tiered schedule from 18% to 35% and a $10 million lifetime exemption that is indexed for inflation after 2011. - Generation‑skipping transfers made on or after enactment would not be subject to the GST tax. Qualified domestic trusts for surviving spouses of decedents who died before enactment would follow transitional rules, including changed treatment of distributions after a 10‑year period beginning on the enactment date.
HR703 — Main Street Tax Certainty Act
This bill would permanently preserve the qualified business income (QBI) deduction by removing the sunset provision in Internal Revenue Code section 199A. The change would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, so the deduction would be available for 2026 and later tax years. It achieves this by striking subsection (i) of section 199A and setting that effective date. Taxpayers with qualified business income would continue to claim the QBI deduction under the existing Section 199A rules for those years.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in