SPEED for BEAD Act
Sponsored By: Representative Hudson
Introduced
Summary
Would streamline and expand broadband deployment under the BEAD program by setting a clear gigabit standard, allowing any technology that meets performance, and limiting grant-related conditions and federal rate-setting.
Show full summary
- Families and communities: Would treat any technology that meets the performance criteria as reliable broadband and defines gigabit as at least 1,000 megabits per second (1,000 Mbps), broadening which builds qualify.
- Workers and trainees: Would add telecommunications workforce development as an eligible use of BEAD funds, opening federal support for training and hiring.
- Local implementers and providers: Would let project applicants remove high-cost locations from defined project areas and still receive subgrants, and would bar grant conditions tied to wages, project labor agreements, union or local-hiring rules, diversity or equity requirements, network management rules like data caps, and certain letters of credit.
- Program funding rules: Would require unused BEAD allocations, after deadlines, to be transferred to the general fund of the Treasury.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
6 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 1 costs, 2 mixed.
Limits on BEAD bid conditions
The bill would bar BEAD officials from requiring rules on wages, project labor agreements, union status, local hiring, climate, network practices (like data caps), open access, or diversity/equity programs. It would also restrict certain letters‑of‑credit demands when a provider already runs similar networks and seeks less than 25% of its annual revenue or to serve less than 25% of its locations. These limits would apply even if a state proposed them earlier.
Let bidders drop costly locations
If a state defines a project area, bidders would be able to remove locations that make the job unreasonably costly. The state could then award separate subgrants for the removed sites. This could help smaller providers bid on the rest.
Wider tech options for BEAD builds
The bill would let BEAD projects use any technology that meets the program’s performance rules. Fiber, fixed wireless, or satellite could qualify if they pass the tests. It would also define gigabit‑level service as at least 1,000 megabits per second download. States would use this standard to judge eligible sites and bids.
Unused BEAD money returns to Treasury
If a recipient does not use its full BEAD allocation by the deadline, the unused money would go back to the U.S. Treasury. States or other recipients that miss the deadline would lose access to those funds. This could reduce broadband buildouts where delays occur.
No price setting in BEAD projects
The bill would stop the NTIA and states from setting or capping broadband rates or using prices to score bids. Two exceptions would remain: rate rules approved before enactment, or rate rules tied to a required low‑cost plan. Providers would have more pricing flexibility; consumers could see fewer price controls.
BEAD funds for telecom training
The bill would allow BEAD money to pay for telecom workforce programs. Training, apprenticeships, and similar programs could get funding. Workers who enroll could gain skills for broadband jobs.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Hudson
NC • R
Cosponsors
Allen
GA • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Latta
OH • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Bilirakis
FL • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Carter (GA)
GA • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Dunn (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Joyce (PA)
PA • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Fulcher
ID • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Pfluger
TX • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Cammack
FL • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Obernolte
CA • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Houchin
IN • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Fry
SC • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Goldman (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Crenshaw
TX • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Fedorchak
ND • R
Sponsored 3/10/2025
Miller-Meeks
IA • R
Sponsored 3/10/2025
Bergman
MI • R
Sponsored 3/31/2025
Harrigan
NC • R
Sponsored 4/7/2025
Weber (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 5/21/2025
Wittman
VA • R
Sponsored 7/14/2025
Foxx
NC • R
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Williams (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 1/7/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR703 — Main Street Tax Certainty Act
This bill would permanently preserve the qualified business income (QBI) deduction by removing the sunset provision in Internal Revenue Code section 199A. The change would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, so the deduction would be available for 2026 and later tax years. It achieves this by striking subsection (i) of section 199A and setting that effective date. Taxpayers with qualified business income would continue to claim the QBI deduction under the existing Section 199A rules for those years.
HR38 — Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
National concealed-carry reciprocity. This bill would create nationwide recognition of state concealed-carry licenses so people with a valid photo ID and a state permit or the right to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in many other States. - Gun owners and travelers: People not federally prohibited from firearms possession who hold a state concealed-carry license or are entitled to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in States that issue permits or do not ban concealed carry. Machine guns and destructive devices are excluded. It would take effect 90 days after enactment. - State and property rights: States would keep the power to prohibit or restrict concealed carry on private property and on State or local government property. The bill also lists federal public lands and agencies where carrying would be allowed in publicly accessible areas, including National Park units and Forest Service land. - Criminal and civil protections: Officers may not arrest absent probable cause that the carry falls outside the law and prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt when the defense is raised. Prevailing defendants can recover reasonable attorney fees and may sue for deprivation of rights with damages.
HRES719 — Honoring the life and legacy of Charles "Charlie" James Kirk.
Condemns political violence. The resolution condemns the assassination of Charles 'Charlie' James Kirk, honors his life and leadership, and urges swift justice while offering sympathy to his family.
HR21 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Mandates care and penalties for infants born alive after an abortion. This bill would set standards of care, require reporting, create criminal penalties, and allow civil suits when an infant is born alive following an abortion. - Women and families: A woman on whom an abortion is performed may sue anyone who violates the law and recover objectively verifiable medical and psychological damages, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. Courts must award reasonable attorney's fees to prevailing plaintiffs and may award fees to defendants if a suit is frivolous. - Health care practitioners and facility employees: Any practitioner present at a birth resulting from an abortion must exercise the same professional skill, care, and diligence as for any other live-born infant of the same gestational age. Practitioners or employees who know of a failure to comply must immediately report the violation to appropriate State or Federal law enforcement. - Criminal and statutory consequences: Violators face fines, up to 5 years in prison, or both, and anyone who intentionally kills a born-alive infant is punished under the murder statute. The bill also updates chapter headings and adds statutory definitions for "abortion" and "attempt."
HR3699 — Energy Choice Act
Preempt state and local limits on energy sources. This bill would bar a State or local government, and any state or local instrumentality or regulatory agency, from adopting, implementing, or enforcing laws, building codes, standards, or policies that prohibit or limit connecting, reconnecting, modifying, installing, transporting, distributing, expanding, or accessing an energy service based on the type or source of energy when that energy is sold in interstate commerce and delivered to an end-user.
HR452 — Miracle on Ice Congressional Gold Medal Act
This law awards Congressional Gold Medals to the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team as a formal recognition of their Lake Placid victory and its lasting effect on American morale and the sport of hockey. It directs the Treasury to strike the medals and sets rules for duplicates, display, and funding. - Team legacy and public recognition: The Act honors the 1980 team with a symbolic national award that reinforces their historical and cultural significance for fans, players, and communities connected to the game. - Museum displays and research access: One gold medal goes to the Lake Placid Olympic Center, one to the United States Hockey Hall of Fame Museum in Eveleth, Minnesota, and one to the United States Olympic & Paralympic Museum in Colorado Springs for display and research. - Mint operations and collectibles: The Secretary of the Treasury will strike the medals, may sell bronze duplicates at prices that cover costs, and classifies the medals as national and numismatic items. The U.S. Mint Public Enterprise Fund pays for production and receives proceeds from duplicate sales.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in