Restoring Equal Opportunity Act
Sponsored By: Representative Gill (TX)
Introduced
Summary
Prohibits disparate-impact liability under major federal civil rights laws in employment and housing. It would also nullify specific EEOC and Justice Department regulations and the Presidential approvals that adopted them.
Show full summary
- Workers and protected groups: Individuals could not bring claims under Title VII that challenge neutral workplace policies because they produce disproportionate effects on certain groups.
- Tenants and housing applicants: People could not bring disparate-impact claims under the Fair Housing Act against neutral housing practices that disproportionately affect protected classes.
- Employers and housing providers: Would reduce legal exposure for neutral hiring, promotion, or housing policies that have unequal outcomes across groups.
- Federal rules and enforcement: Would void identified 1966 EEOC and 1973 DOJ regulations and the Presidential approvals tied to section 602 of the Civil Rights Act, removing those rules from effect.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
3 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 2 costs, 1 mixed.
No disparate-impact claims in housing
If enacted, renters and home buyers could not bring "disparate impact" claims under the Fair Housing Act. Claims that require proof of intentional discrimination would still be allowed. Landlords and housing providers would face fewer legal risks over neutral policies that affect groups differently. This would take effect when the bill becomes law.
No disparate-impact claims at work
If enacted, workers and job seekers would not be able to sue under the "disparate impact" theory in federal employment law. Claims that require proof of intentional discrimination would still be allowed. Employers would face fewer lawsuits over neutral policies that affect groups differently. This would take effect when the bill becomes law.
Cancels parts of civil rights rules
If enacted, the bill would cancel certain past Presidential approvals of civil rights regulations and remove specific regulatory language. Agencies and recipients of federal funds could face fewer compliance risks tied to "effects" of policies. People bringing civil-rights complaints could have fewer tools to enforce those claims. This would take effect when the bill becomes law.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Gill (TX)
TX • R
Cosponsors
Mace
SC • R
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Jack
GA • R
Sponsored 1/22/2026
Ogles
TN • R
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Moore (AL)
AL • R
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Donalds
FL • R
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Brecheen
OK • R
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Alford
MO • R
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Higgins (LA)
LA • R
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Guest
MS • R
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Hunt
TX • R
Sponsored 2/2/2026
McCormick
GA • R
Sponsored 2/2/2026
Harshbarger
TN • R
Sponsored 2/2/2026
Roy
TX • R
Sponsored 2/2/2026
Clyde
GA • R
Sponsored 2/2/2026
McGuire
VA • R
Sponsored 2/2/2026
Self
TX • R
Sponsored 2/2/2026
Gosar
AZ • R
Sponsored 2/3/2026
Miller (IL)
IL • R
Sponsored 2/3/2026
Kennedy (UT)
UT • R
Sponsored 2/3/2026
Barr
KY • R
Sponsored 2/3/2026
Latta
OH • R
Sponsored 2/3/2026
Collins
GA • R
Sponsored 2/3/2026
DesJarlais
TN • R
Sponsored 2/3/2026
Perry
PA • R
Sponsored 2/3/2026
Boebert
CO • R
Sponsored 2/4/2026
Moore (WV)
WV • R
Sponsored 2/4/2026
Norman
SC • R
Sponsored 2/4/2026
Rulli
OH • R
Sponsored 2/4/2026
Rose
TN • R
Sponsored 2/4/2026
Cloud
TX • R
Sponsored 2/4/2026
Biggs (SC)
SC • R
Sponsored 2/4/2026
Cline
VA • R
Sponsored 2/4/2026
Kustoff
TN • R
Sponsored 2/5/2026
Patronis
FL • R
Sponsored 2/9/2026
Pfluger
TX • R
Sponsored 2/9/2026
Franklin, Scott
FL • R
Sponsored 2/9/2026
Stutzman
IN • R
Sponsored 2/9/2026
Biggs (AZ)
AZ • R
Sponsored 2/9/2026
Grothman
WI • R
Sponsored 2/9/2026
Van Epps
TN • R
Sponsored 2/17/2026
Jackson (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 2/17/2026
McDowell
NC • R
Sponsored 2/17/2026
Crank
CO • R
Sponsored 2/23/2026
Estes
KS • R
Sponsored 2/23/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR925 — Dismantle DEI Act of 2025
Bans many federal Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices across the federal government. The bill would define a narrow set of "prohibited DEI practices," require agencies to end DEI offices and related programs, and block similar DEI requirements for contractors, grantees, accrediting bodies, and parts of the military and financial regulators.
HR425 — Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act
Ends the Corporate Transparency Act and removes its amendments from federal law. It also adjusts related U.S. Code citations and parts of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 to reflect that repeal. - Repeals the Corporate Transparency Act as title LXIV of division F of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283) and removes all amendments made by that Act. - Edits Title 31, United States Code by removing or changing cross-references that mentioned section 5336 and updating references in sections 5321 and 5322. - Alters the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 by repealing section 6502 and striking or modifying portions of section 6509 as described in the bill.
HR38 — Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
National concealed-carry reciprocity. This bill would create nationwide recognition of state concealed-carry licenses so people with a valid photo ID and a state permit or the right to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in many other States. - Gun owners and travelers: People not federally prohibited from firearms possession who hold a state concealed-carry license or are entitled to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in States that issue permits or do not ban concealed carry. Machine guns and destructive devices are excluded. It would take effect 90 days after enactment. - State and property rights: States would keep the power to prohibit or restrict concealed carry on private property and on State or local government property. The bill also lists federal public lands and agencies where carrying would be allowed in publicly accessible areas, including National Park units and Forest Service land. - Criminal and civil protections: Officers may not arrest absent probable cause that the carry falls outside the law and prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt when the defense is raised. Prevailing defendants can recover reasonable attorney fees and may sue for deprivation of rights with damages.
HR4620 — To amend title 18, United States Code, to include rioting in the definition of racketeering activity.
Adds rioting to the list of predicate offenses under the federal RICO law. This bill would let prosecutors treat rioting, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2101, as a qualifying act that can help prove a pattern of racketeering and trigger RICO remedies like criminal penalties, asset forfeiture, and civil enforcement. - Individuals accused of riot-related crimes could face RICO charges and federal criminal penalties and may be subject to asset forfeiture if rioting fits a pattern of racketeering. - Organizations linked to repeated riot-related offenses could be targeted with criminal RICO prosecutions and civil RICO suits, including seizure of assets. - Federal prosecutors would gain another tool to connect multiple riot incidents into a single pattern and pursue racketeering remedies across related conduct.
HR7296 — SAVE America Act
Requires documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register for federal elections and a nationwide tangible photo ID for voting. The bill pairs those rules with a rapid federal verification program using DHS SAVE and the Social Security Administration’s SSN Verification Service and sets tight setup deadlines for implementation.
HR1301 — Death Tax Repeal Act
This bill would repeal the federal estate tax and the generation‑skipping transfer tax. It would also reshape gift tax rules by keeping tiered rates but creating a $10 million lifetime exemption indexed for inflation. - Heirs of people who die on or after enactment would not owe the federal estate tax. This removes that tax from those estates. - Donors and high‑net‑worth individuals would still face a gift tax, but under a tiered schedule from 18% to 35% and a $10 million lifetime exemption that is indexed for inflation after 2011. - Generation‑skipping transfers made on or after enactment would not be subject to the GST tax. Qualified domestic trusts for surviving spouses of decedents who died before enactment would follow transitional rules, including changed treatment of distributions after a 10‑year period beginning on the enactment date.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in