Housing Is a Human Right Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Jayapal
Introduced
Summary
End penalization of homelessness and expand Housing First supports. This bill would create new grants, a CDBG Plus block grant, permanent supportive housing priorities, voting access and library pilots, and new taxes on luxury property and large landlords to fund those programs.
Show full summary
- Would expand help for people experiencing homelessness and very low-income households by creating Housing First and permanent supportive housing priorities, funding diversion and mobile crisis teams, and authorizing targeted grants like $100 million per year for DOJ alternatives to penalization and $1 billion per year for FEMA Emergency Food & Shelter for 10 years.
- Would change how local governments and service providers work with homeless people by requiring lived-experience participation, universal non-discrimination protections, staff training for entities receiving over $1 million, new citizen participation rules for CDBG Plus, and faster federal property conveyances for homeless-serving projects.
- Would raise dedicated revenue and target program funding by adding three new taxes: a 5% tax on real-estate sales of $10 million or more, a 10% transfer tax on anonymous-entity sales, and a 1% rent tax on very large landlords; ESG and Continuum of Care grants would be topped up to $10 billion annually through credits and appropriations.
*Would pair new dedicated taxes with expanded, recurring housing program funding and direct those revenues to HUD and related programs.*
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
9 provisions identified: 7 benefits, 2 costs, 0 mixed.
Big boost for homeless housing programs
If enacted, HUD would launch a new CDBG Plus program to build and fix deeply affordable housing and needed services. Funds could build units for very low-income renters, convert hotels to housing, improve ADA access, and add basic-needs infrastructure. Until HUD writes new rules, money would be split using the old CDBG formula; a new need-based formula would be set within 12 months. Treasury would credit housing revenues each year: 40% to Emergency Solutions Grants, 40% to Continuum of Care, and 20% to CDBG Plus. ESG and CoC would be topped up each year to reach $10 billion each, for the first fiscal year after enactment and the next nine years.
Grants to stop penalizing homelessness
If enacted, the Attorney General could give $100 million each year for ten years to build alternatives to punishing homelessness. States, cities, public defenders, and nonprofits could apply. The money would support diversion and other approaches that connect people to services instead of arrest or fines.
More emergency food and shelter help
If enacted, the Emergency Food and Shelter program would cover more needs, like hygiene supplies, shelter repairs, tiny homes, and medical respite. Boards and providers would need nondiscrimination rules that protect gender identity and appearance. The program would get $1 billion each year for ten years. GAO would issue three reports over 12, 24, and 36 months to review funding methods and provider compliance.
New taxes on big property deals
If enacted, sales of real property with $10,000,000 or more in total sale price would face a 5% tax, usually split between buyer and seller. Transfers to tax‑exempt groups or governments would be excepted. A separate 10% tax would apply if a buyer or seller is an anonymous entity that does not make beneficial owners publicly available (with some LEI program exceptions). These taxes would apply to sales after December 31, 2025.
More voices in federal homelessness council
If enacted, an advisory board of at least 20 people would be created, with at least 10 members who are currently or were recently homeless. The board would meet twice a year, and members would get a stipend and travel costs. The Council would need 75% approval of Council and advisory board members to appoint its Executive Director; if no agreement, the advisory chair would serve as interim. The Council would be required to use evidence‑based practices, promote Housing First, and address disparities.
Grants tied to fair, non-punitive rules
If enacted, any group getting this Act’s funds would need a written nondiscrimination policy, including protections for gender identity and expression. Nonprofits would need regular community input. Recipients with over $1,000,000 a year would train staff in harm reduction, de‑escalation, trauma‑informed care, bias, and disability rights. Governments would need to show they are not enforcing laws that punish sleeping outside and that property handling follows due process. The Secretary could waive some matching funds if a government adopts Housing First and plans to end penalization.
More help in schools and libraries
If enacted, the government would fund $10 million each year for ten years for library pilot programs serving homeless people. State, county, or city library agencies could subgrant to public, school, and public law school libraries, and must report progress each year. The bill would also authorize $10 million each year on a permanent basis for McKinney‑Vento Title II services for students and families facing homelessness.
Help homeless people vote: grants and study
If enacted, the Election Assistance Commission would give $5 million a year for ten years to help homeless and housing‑unstable people vote. Nonprofits must have nondiscrimination policies, and groups with strong track records would get priority. The Commission would also study state‑by‑state barriers, including voter ID and REAL ID, and report within one year.
1% rent tax for mega landlords
If enacted, a 1% tax would apply to rent paid when the landlord is a very large owner (over 1,000 units in one metro, over 2,000 units overall, or 500 units across at least 3 states). Units covered by rent control, just‑cause, or source‑of‑income laws would be exempt. This would apply after December 31, 2025.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Jayapal
WA • D
Cosponsors
Meng
NY • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Ansari
AZ • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Carson
IN • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Casar
TX • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Chu
CA • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Clarke (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Evans (PA)
PA • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Garcia (IL)
IL • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Gomez
CA • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Johnson (GA)
GA • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Lee (PA)
PA • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Lieu
CA • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
McGovern
MA • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Ocasio-Cortez
NY • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Omar
MN • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Pressley
MA • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Ramirez
IL • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Simon
CA • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Stansbury
NM • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Thanedar
MI • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Tlaib
MI • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Torres (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Watson Coleman
NJ • D
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Goldman (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 7/21/2025
Pocan
WI • D
Sponsored 8/15/2025
McIver
NJ • D
Sponsored 8/15/2025
McGarvey
KY • D
Sponsored 11/18/2025
Grijalva
AZ • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Cohen
TN • D
Sponsored 1/22/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR51 — Washington, D.C. Admission Act
Full statehood for Washington, Douglass Commonwealth would admit the District of Columbia as a new state on equal footing, while defining a smaller federal "Capital" and setting staged transitions for courts, property, and federal programs. - Capital residents would gain full congressional representation: two U.S. Senators and one U.S. Representative. The bill also requires states to allow "absent Capital" residents to vote by absentee ballot in federal elections. - The U.S. House would be permanently increased to 436 members and apportionment would be adjusted beginning with the first decennial census after admission. - The bill defines the federal Capital with a required 180-day survey, preserves federal court, prosecutorial, prison, parole, National Guard, and employee benefit arrangements on a temporary basis, and phases those responsibilities to the State as it certifies the necessary laws and personnel are in place.
HR20 — Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
Strengthens worker organizing rights and enforcement. The bill broadens who counts as an employee or joint employer and builds tougher remedies, penalties, and election rules to make organizing and bargaining easier to enforce and monitor. - Workers: Expands who is treated as an employee by tightening the three-part test for independent contractors and broadening the joint-employer test to include direct, indirect, and reserved control. It adds clear protections for strike participation and allows back pay without reduction and liquidated damages equal to twice awarded damages. - Employers: Requires prompt disclosure and new notice duties including a detailed voter list within two business days and multilingual employee notices. Noncompliance can trigger civil penalties including up to $50,000 per unfair labor practice, up to $10,000 per refusal to obey Board orders, and fines for posting or voter-list violations. - Elections, agencies, and unions: NLRB must adopt remote electronic voting within one year and aim to hold elections within twenty business days. The bill also boosts NLRB reporting and transparency, expands private suits, and creates new whistleblower protections and expedited enforcement.
HR1589 — American Dream and Promise Act of 2025
New pathways to permanent residence. This bill would create a ten‑year conditional permanent resident status for certain people who entered as children and would add an adjustment pathway for specified Temporary Protected Status and Deferred Enforced Departure holders. - Young long‑term residents and DACA‑eligible people could get a ten‑year conditional status if they meet rules like continuous presence since Jan 1, 2021 and education or credential benchmarks. They could convert to full permanent residence after meeting removal‑of‑condition rules and have limits on removal while applying. - Nationals with qualifying TPS or DED status who meet continuous‑presence rules could apply within a three‑year window and face a capped application fee of $1,140. - The bill creates a competitive grant program to help applicants, allows fee exemptions for youth, low‑income people, foster care alumni, and those with serious disabilities, and adds a $25 supplemental surcharge to fund appointed counsel.
HR5390 — FAMILY Act
This bill would create a federally administered paid family and medical leave insurance program that pays eligible workers for caregiving and serious medical needs while adding job and health coverage protections. It sets benefit formulas, eligibility rules, and a new Office of Paid Family and Medical Leave inside the Social Security Administration to run the program. - Families and caregivers: Would get paid leave based on earnings with benefits calculated using a three-tier formula and monthly minimum and maximum amounts. Caregiving is tracked in 1-hour units and capped per benefit period at 12 times an individual’s regular weekly hours, and the eligibility wage floor is $2,000 for benefit periods beginning in 2026. - Workers and job protections: Would include restoration to the same or equivalent job, continuation of health coverage during leave, anti-retaliation rules with a 12-month rebuttable presumption for recent leave takers, and limited exclusions for new hires. - Administration and employers: Creates a Deputy Commissioner‑led office at the SSA to set rules, run payments, publish annual demographic usage reports, share data with federal agencies, manage legacy State programs to avoid double counting, and require a GAO study after 2026 and every five years thereafter.
HR15 — Equality Act
Adds sexual orientation and gender identity to the federal definition of sex and creates a uniform, nationwide nondiscrimination framework across employment, housing, credit, education, public accommodations, jury service, and programs that receive federal funds. The bill would harmonize definitions, remedies, and rules of construction across multiple civil rights statutes to make enforcement and claims more consistent. - Workers: Private and federal employees would gain explicit protection from discrimination for sexual orientation and gender identity. The bill would update Title VII rules, expand remedies, and adjust bona fide occupational qualification rules to account for gender identity. - People using public places, students, and tenants: Public accommodations and education laws would explicitly bar discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The Fair Housing Act would adopt the same definitions and protections to cover renters and buyers. - Borrowers, juries, and enforcement: The Equal Credit Opportunity Act would bar credit discrimination on these bases. Jury selection rules would be updated to prevent discrimination. The bill would also prevent the Religious Freedom Restoration Act from being used to challenge enforcement under the covered civil rights laws.
HR14 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore robust federal oversight of voting rights by rewriting Section 2 and creating a broad practice-based preclearance system. It sets new tests for vote-dilution and vote-denial claims, adds retrogression rules for actions on or after January 1, 2021, and requires extensive public notice, data disclosure, and observer powers. - Minority and language-minority voters: Provides clearer legal paths to challenge districting and practices that dilute or abridge votes, recognizes coalitions of minority groups, and applies retrogression rules to actions from January 1, 2021. - States and local election officials: Triggers preclearance using a 25-year lookback with numeric thresholds and creates an administrative bailout that requires demonstrating sustained compliance over a 10-year period to avoid coverage. - Enforcement, oversight, and courts: Expands who may sue to include private "aggrieved persons", centralizes observer authority in the Attorney General, and authorizes pre-suit inspection and information demands that courts may enforce or modify.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in