FEMA Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Graves
In Committee
Summary
FEMA becomes an independent, cabinet-level agency with a clarified all-hazards mission and consolidated federal leadership for preparedness, response, recovery, mitigation, and interoperable communications. The bill also rewrites large parts of the Stafford Act to speed repairs, expand assistance, strengthen mitigation, and publish new public dashboards for disaster spending and individual aid metrics.
Show full summary
- Families and disaster survivors: Expands housing help with a FEMA Emergency Home Repair program, authorizes direct repair assistance, and extends some temporary assistance periods from 18 to 24 months. Noncongregate sheltering can be provided without a fixed address and states cannot require a credit card for hoteling.
- State, Tribal, and local governments and utilities: Creates expedited Section 409 grants for repairing public and qualifying nonprofit facilities with a Federal share floor of 75% and incentives up to 85% for resilience. Offers small-disaster block grants equal to 80% of the estimated Federal public assistance share and sets a Tribal hazard-mitigation minimum of $75.0 million per year.
- Private nonprofits and houses of worship: Treats private nonprofits and houses of worship as eligible for assistance without regard to religious character and expands nonprofit closeout and eligibility parity with governments.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
29 provisions identified: 24 benefits, 1 costs, 4 mixed.
One application for many disaster programs
If enacted, FEMA would build a single web application to apply for many federal disaster programs. You could track your status and documents in one place. Agencies could only join after meeting strict data‑security and privacy rules and signing agreements with breach duties. FEMA could use limited, transparent waivers to collect needed info quickly, and GAO would review waiver risks within one year.
More disaster housing help for families
If enacted, disaster survivors could get direct money to repair an owner‑occupied primary home, utilities, and basic residential infrastructure when they cannot use other aid and lack resources. The President could also offer replacement help when a home is a total loss and replacement would cost less than repairs. Insurance money would not block short‑term displacement help, which would cover food, water, hygiene items, baby supplies, fuel, emergency supplies, hotels or motels, and stays with family or friends. For State‑managed housing aid, the federal share would be at least 75%, and States would need to share plan details and survivor choice where possible. FEMA would study renters’ access to aid and send a plan to Congress within 1 year.
Stronger renter and homeowner aid after disasters
If enacted, some temporary housing help would last up to 24 months, not 18. FEMA would have to consider local rent spikes when setting rental aid. More homes could qualify because the trigger changes to "damaged by a major disaster." People would not need a credit card or deposit to get approved non‑congregate sheltering. FEMA could not send a denial while your insurance claim is still pending. If you appeal and win (or FEMA erred), the Agency would reimburse your attorney’s fees, and FEMA must share the documents and reasons for decisions.
Upfront help to repair and harden homes
If enacted, the government could advance the full federal share to States for mitigation projects. FEMA would offer to advance the federal share to homeowners before work starts on resilience retrofits, like home elevations. It could also give direct help to households that lack resources for repairs or mitigation, without needing to show other means beyond insurance proceeds. Small emergency repairs up to habitability would be allowed so owners can safely shelter in place after a major disaster, subject to funding. FEMA would identify sheltering and housing options within 15 days of a disaster and issue final rules within two years.
FEMA becomes cabinet-level with oversight
If enacted, FEMA would become a cabinet‑level independent agency with a mission to reduce loss of life and property. The Administrator would lead national planning and response, oversee key teams and stockpiles, and integrate the needs of children, people with disabilities, and other vulnerable groups. The Administrator must be a seasoned emergency manager, and FEMA would have an Inspector General. Many related functions would transfer into FEMA within one year, with help from DHS during the transition.
New rules for hazard mitigation funding
If enacted, hazard mitigation dollars would be split by a set formula: 40% equally to eligible States; 20% by infrastructure risk; 20% by higher population and lower median income; and 20% by approved projects in distressed or rural areas. States would need to pass at least 50% of their funds to local governments within 60 days. Tribal governments would get no less than $75,000,000 each year. Funds for the same project could be combined across programs, and unused management funds could be reused for up to 5 years for capacity‑building and preparedness. Electric utilities could pair mitigation work with emergency power restoration and still qualify for mitigation aid. A mitigation loan program description would add “resilience” and change a program threshold from 2 to 4.
Preapproved mitigation plans for higher match
If enacted, States and Tribes would need to submit preapproved mitigation project plans within three years to qualify for a higher federal share. Plans must list projects, describe them, and estimate costs. A peer panel would recommend decisions within three months, and the President would act within one month after recommendations. Missing the deadline would make a jurisdiction ineligible for the higher share.
No income test for DOB waivers
If enacted, people seeking a duplication‑of‑benefits waiver would not face an income threshold. This would apply to disasters declared on or after January 1, 2016. It would not change rules for Sections 406, 408, or 409.
Pilot grants for home resilience upgrades
If enacted, FEMA would run a pilot to help pay for home resilience retrofits, like floodproofing, safe rooms, seismic, wildfire, and wind upgrades. The pilot must start within one year and ends September 30, 2028. It would prioritize people who show financial need and may use up to 10% of annual Section 203 funds.
Protect FEMA workers’ pay and staffing
If enacted, employees moved into the new Agency would keep their grade and pay for 1 year after transfer. Leaders reappointed without a break would keep at least their prior Executive Schedule rate. FEMA would study hiring and retention in noncontiguous communities, brief Congress within 6 months, and update policies to fix staffing problems.
Public dashboards and data on disaster aid
If enacted, FEMA would post public dashboards after disasters showing project costs, timelines, and decisions, plus an Individual Assistance dashboard with approvals, denials, and top denial reasons. Agencies would publish quarterly, machine‑readable data on disaster spending by project. FEMA would study nationwide mitigation results, with the first report due in 18 months, public data in two years, and yearly updates.
Direct fire assistance for Tribal governments
If enacted, Tribal governments could request fire management help directly from FEMA and receive grants and resources. The program would cover assessments and emergency stabilization to protect public safety, even outside the incident period. The President would need to update the rules within 1 year after consulting with Tribal governments. If a Tribal direct request is not granted, State‑requested eligibility would still be preserved.
Faster pay and simpler debris rules
If enacted, emergency‑work reimbursements would be paid within 120 days after a request, when the President finds at least 90% of estimated costs are eligible. The President would be barred from adding extra requirements for debris removal beyond what the law already lists. FEMA would need to update guidance and finish a debris‑contracting best‑practices review within 1 year. Owners and operators of eligible private nonprofit facilities would be treated like State and local governments for closeout rules.
Faster reviews and less disaster paperwork
If enacted, FEMA would set up a unified review to speed environmental and historic checks within 1 year. One review could cover all agencies, with a 45–60 day public comment window and a final decision within 90 days after the final statement. Within 2 years, FEMA would plan to cut paperwork for applicants, post award data on a public website, and form a group to streamline damage assessments. FEMA would need to act on the group’s recommendations within 180 days.
Faster reviews for same-site disaster repairs
If enacted, repair or replacement work done in the same place would not count as a major NEPA action. Some permits could be allowed on notice, and historic and endangered species reviews could be expedited for repairs. States could take over FEMA’s environmental and historic reviews if they meet safeguards and accept audits and liability. FEMA must issue rules in 180 days.
Keep FEMA programs running during move
If enacted, older legal mentions of FEMA and its leaders would point to the new Agency so programs keep working. Existing orders, permits, contracts, and cases would continue during the transition. Some grant programs would stay in the Department of Homeland Security during the shift, with an agreement so FEMA runs them and may charge DHS an administration fee.
More weight for rural and distressed areas
If enacted, FEMA would have to factor in whether affected places are economically distressed or rural when recommending disaster declarations. If Section 409 aid is authorized for such areas, the President would be directed to provide Section 408 aid too. FEMA would update policies and guidance to follow this.
Reimburse housing for responders and pumping
If enacted, FEMA could reimburse governments for sheltering emergency responders when damage disrupts normal services, for up to six months after the incident period ends. Owners and operators of stormwater pumping stations could be reimbursed for flood‑fighting work at equipment rates, including temporary and permanent setups.
Review disaster timing and fast-moving events
If enacted, FEMA would convene a panel within six months to review how incident periods are set, including slow‑onset and compound disasters. An interim report is due in one year, a final report in two years, and rulemaking would follow after a 30‑day congressional review. FEMA would also set up a group within 90 days to study fast‑moving disasters, with best practices due in one year.
Simpler forms and contracting for grants
If enacted, FEMA must create a single hazard mitigation grant form within 180 days to reduce paperwork and speed payments. Local governments would be treated like States for certain federal procurement rules when using Stafford Act funds. These changes aim to speed agreements and contracting.
Small disaster block grants for States
If enacted, a State or Tribe could choose a one‑time block grant equal to 80% of the estimated federal share for a small disaster. They must pick the option when seeking the declaration and agree on the amount within 90 days. FEMA would approve within 90 days of a complete application and send funds within 30 days after approval. Choosing this option would replace regular Public Assistance for that disaster.
Task force to close disaster backlog
If enacted, FEMA would create a task force to cut its backlog of declared disasters. The task force must deliver results within one year and then end. FEMA must brief Congress within 180 days and every six months until 800 disasters are closed. A disaster can be closed once 90% of approved costs are validated. The Comptroller General would review within two years.
More crisis counseling, with admin caps
If enacted, crisis counseling after disasters would clearly cover substance and alcohol use, along with private mental health care. FEMA would review application changes and report to Congress within 180 days. Admin pay would be capped: up to 12% for a grantee under one program, and up to 15% combined for grantee and subgrantee under others.
Shift to faster public facility grants
If enacted, FEMA could issue faster grants to repair or replace public and qualifying nonprofit facilities after a major disaster. FEMA would review cost estimates within 90 days and make funds available within 30 days after approval, with a federal share of at least 75% (possible incentives up to 85% or reductions to 65% for failing required mitigation). Applicants must submit estimates within 5 years unless extended. Also, no new Section 406 applications could be approved if filed 180 days after enactment, and much of Section 406 would end on December 31, 2032. Applicants who filed before enactment could choose the new Section 409 grant instead.
FEMA working capital fund and fees
If enacted, FEMA would create a revolving working capital fund to run shared facilities. FEMA could charge fees that cover full operating costs and accept advance payments when needed. During transition, FEMA could take over related DHS assets and balances. These steps could raise or shift costs for agencies and other facility users.
No disaster aid bias by politics
If enacted, FEMA could not deny or reduce disaster help because of your political affiliation. This would add politics to the list of protected traits when FEMA decides eligibility and aid.
Clear definitions for disasters and reporting
If enacted, the bill would set standard definitions for terms like catastrophic incident, State, local government, Tribal government, and vulnerable populations with access and functional needs. It would also define which agencies, assistance types, and recipients must report disaster data. These definitions guide how programs and transparency rules would work.
Veterans Advocate to improve disaster help
If enacted, FEMA would designate a Veterans Advocate. The Advocate would join disaster declaration processes, work with veterans’ groups, and promote hiring of veterans, including reservists. This would not create new benefits on its own but aims to improve access and fairness.
Use two latest building codes
If enacted, FEMA programs would use the two most recent editions of consensus codes and standards, including local or Tribal amendments. The hazard mitigation revolving loan fund would implement these editions. This could raise some project costs but aims to improve safety and resilience.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Graves
MO • R
Cosponsors
Larsen (WA)
WA • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Webster (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Stanton
AZ • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rouzer
NC • R
Sponsored 8/1/2025
Ezell
MS • R
Sponsored 8/1/2025
Edwards
NC • R
Sponsored 8/1/2025
Haridopolos
FL • R
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Thompson (CA)
CA • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Friedman
CA • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Carter (GA)
GA • R
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Fine
FL • R
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Cole
OK • R
Sponsored 9/3/2025
Moskowitz
FL • D
Sponsored 9/3/2025
Riley (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 9/9/2025
Fitzpatrick
PA • R
Sponsored 9/9/2025
McBath
GA • D
Sponsored 9/10/2025
Bilirakis
FL • R
Sponsored 9/10/2025
Guthrie
KY • R
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Gillen
NY • D
Sponsored 9/17/2025
Calvert
CA • R
Sponsored 9/19/2025
Bergman
MI • R
Sponsored 9/19/2025
Alford
MO • R
Sponsored 9/26/2025
Davis (NC)
NC • D
Sponsored 9/26/2025
Vasquez
NM • D
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Mann
KS • R
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Huizenga
MI • R
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Vindman
VA • D
Sponsored 10/8/2025
Bell
MO • D
Sponsored 10/17/2025
Bynum
OR • D
Sponsored 10/17/2025
Walberg
MI • R
Sponsored 10/21/2025
Dunn (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 10/21/2025
Harrigan
NC • R
Sponsored 10/21/2025
Franklin, Scott
FL • R
Sponsored 11/7/2025
Grothman
WI • R
Sponsored 11/7/2025
Cammack
FL • R
Sponsored 11/7/2025
Fields
LA • D
Sponsored 11/7/2025
Miller (WV)
WV • R
Sponsored 11/17/2025
Soto
FL • D
Sponsored 12/2/2025
Timmons
SC • R
Sponsored 12/5/2025
Bishop
GA • D
Sponsored 12/9/2025
Pappas
NH • D
Sponsored 12/18/2025
Yakym
IN • R
Sponsored 1/7/2026
Wilson (SC)
SC • R
Sponsored 1/8/2026
Bresnahan
PA • R
Sponsored 1/21/2026
Steube
FL • R
Sponsored 1/21/2026
Suozzi
NY • D
Sponsored 1/22/2026
Murphy
NC • R
Sponsored 1/22/2026
Schrier
WA • D
Sponsored 1/27/2026
Balderson
OH • R
Sponsored 1/27/2026
Langworthy
NY • R
Sponsored 1/27/2026
Ross
NC • D
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Figures
AL • D
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Moore (NC)
NC • R
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Lee (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Begich
AK • R
Sponsored 1/30/2026
LaLota
NY • R
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Smith (WA)
WA • D
Sponsored 2/2/2026
Carey
OH • R
Sponsored 2/4/2026
Scott, David
GA • D
Sponsored 2/25/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR1262 — Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act
Speeds and strengthens pediatric cancer drug development. It expands which cancer products companies must study in children, reshapes organ transplant network governance and fees, and adds new FDA international and transparency steps. - Children with cancer and researchers: Requires pediatric studies that produce clinically meaningful data on dosing, safety, and early effectiveness and widens the kinds of drug combinations studied. It also sets aside $25 million for pediatric drug studies in each of fiscal years 2026, 2027, and 2028. - Transplant patients and transplant network members: Changes Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network governance and financing by allowing quarterly registration fees, requiring those fees fund OPTN operations, improving electronic health record integration, and calling for a GAO review within two years. - FDA partners and drug makers: Creates an Abraham Accords Office to boost regulatory coordination and technical assistance abroad, and forces more transparency during generic (ANDA) reviews about whether generics are qualitatively and quantitatively the same as listed drugs. It also raises the Medicare Improvement Fund amount from $1.4 billion to $2.6 billion. Increases federal outlays by roughly $1.3 billion, driven by a $1.2 billion boost to the Medicare Improvement Fund and $75 million for pediatric studies, adding to federal spending.
HR842 — Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act
Would expand Medicare to cover multi-cancer early detection screening tests. It defines eligible tests as certain FDA-cleared or approved genomic blood tests or comparable biological-sample tests and directs the Secretary to use the national coverage determinations process to decide when they are covered.
HR1422 — Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act of 2025
Targets Iran's energy revenue through global sanctions. This bill would create a broad sanctions framework to punish foreign persons who process, export, or sell Iran-origin oil, condensates, gas, LNG, or petrochemical products. It pairs blocking of assets and visa bans with ownership-based triggers, waivers, humanitarian carve-outs, and new reporting to limit Iran's access to energy markets and finance for weapons and terrorism. - Foreign energy firms and financial institutions would face blocking of property and bans on transactions if they knowingly handle Iran-origin energy or are 50% or more owned by such actors. Associated aliens could become inadmissible and have visas revoked. - Maritime operators, insurers, flag registries, and LNG pipeline facilities would be exposed to sanctions risk when linked to Iran-origin shipments, though safety-of-crew rules and specific exemptions for imports remain. - Humanitarian organizations would keep explicit exemptions for agricultural commodities, food, medicine, medical devices, and humanitarian assistance to avoid disrupting aid. - U.S. agencies and private companies would see new duties: an interagency working group and multilateral contact group would coordinate enforcement, and private-sector reporting would be required to flag evasion and proceeds from intercepted Iran-origin energy sales.
HR909 — Crime Victims Fund Stabilization Act of 2025
Would make the False Claims Act apply to deposits to the Crime Victims Fund through FY2029. It would also require an Inspector General audit that sets the audit's scope, timing, and recipients, and the measure is titled the Crime Victims Fund Stabilization Act of 2025. - Entities that make deposits to the Crime Victims Fund would be subject to the False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3729–3731) for deposits from enactment through FY2029. - An Inspector General audit would examine the Crime Victims Fund and the bill would set the audit's scope, timing, and who receives the report.
HR979 — AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act of 2025
This bill would require AM broadcast capability to be installed as standard equipment in passenger motor vehicles. It focuses on driver-accessible AM reception, allows digital AM audio to count for compliance, and links vehicle AM capability to emergency alerting through IPAWS. - Drivers and households: Built-in, driver-accessible AM reception would make it easier for people to get local AM stations and emergency alerts from their vehicles. The bill allows devices that receive digital AM to meet the requirement. - Vehicle manufacturers: The Department of Transportation would need to issue a rule within 1 year, with a general compliance deadline no later than 2 years after the rule is issued. Small manufacturers that produced no more than 40,000 passenger vehicles in 2022 would get at least 4 years to comply. - Oversight and emergency systems: States would be barred from imposing their own AM-access rules. The bill mandates interim labels and pricing protections for cars without AM, authorizes civil penalties and DOJ injunctions for violations, requires a GAO study and a congressional briefing within 1 year, and includes an 8-year sunset for the authority.
HR3514 — Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2025
Standardize prior authorization in Medicare Advantage plans to make approvals faster and more transparent for beneficiaries and providers. The bill would require plans that use prior authorization to adopt a secure electronic PA program, publish plan-level PA data, and follow federal timeframes and enrollee protections.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in