George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Ivey
Introduced
Summary
Creates a sweeping federal framework to boost police accountability and transparency through a national misconduct registry, tighter use‑of‑force standards, and funded independent investigations. It also links federal grants to accreditation, anti‑profiling rules, body‑camera rules, and training for officers.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
11 provisions identified: 8 benefits, 0 costs, 3 mixed.
Ban on racial profiling in policing
If enacted, the bill would ban racial and other profiling in routine stops and searches. Officers could rely on race or similar traits only when trustworthy, local, and timely facts link a person to a crime. It would allow civil lawsuits, require federal policies, training, and data collection, and tie Byrne funding to States adopting required training starting one year after enactment.
More reporting on stops and force
If enacted, police at all levels would have to report stops, searches, and use of force with race, ethnicity, age, and gender details. States and Tribes that get Byrne funds would report quarterly and keep records at least 4 years; federal agencies would also report quarterly. The Attorney General would set rules within 6 months, audit yearly, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics would publish national reports within 3 years and then every year. States not in substantial compliance could lose DOJ law‑enforcement aid for that year, and the AG could cut up to 10% of Byrne funds. Researchers and State AGs could get non‑identifying data, and names would be protected. A small pilot would fund up to five hit‑rate projects ($5 million total plus $500,000 to evaluate).
National misconduct registry and officer certifications
If enacted, the Attorney General would create a public National Police Misconduct Registry within 180 days. Federal agencies would report within 1 year and then every 6 months; States that get Byrne funds would report every 180 days starting the first fiscal year that begins after 1 year. Entries would include complaints, discipline, terminations, certifications, lawsuits, and resignations under investigation. To keep Byrne funds starting the first fiscal year after 1 year from enactment, States and localities would need an officer certification/decertification system and must report that all officers completed required certifications in the prior year.
Stronger oversight and independent investigations
If enacted, the bill would fund independent deadly‑force investigations and expand oversight tools. It would authorize $750 million for FY2026–FY2028 to help States and Tribes run independent investigations, and $100 million each year for FY2026–FY2028 for State pattern‑and‑practice probes. A DOJ oversight task force would be created with $5 million each year. State attorneys general could sue in federal court and use subpoena power; DOJ could subpoena documents and witnesses. It would not limit existing remedies and would not waive Tribal sovereign immunity.
Tighter force rules and chokehold bans
If enacted, the bill would set federal rules for using force. Less‑lethal force would be allowed only when necessary and proportional after trying reasonable options. Deadly force would be a last resort to stop imminent serious harm and must avoid substantial risk to others, with a warning when feasible. The Attorney General would issue guidance within 120 days. It would define deadly and non‑deadly force, including chokeholds and repeated Taser shocks. One year after enactment, States would need laws banning chokeholds and carotid holds to keep Byrne or COPS grants, and such holds would count as punishment under federal civil‑rights law.
National rules for police body cameras
If enacted, federal officers would need to wear body cameras and turn them on for calls and stops. Officers would have to tell people they are being recorded, and in homes or with victims, some can ask to stop. Cameras could not use facial recognition or have footage run through it. Agencies using these grants would need public policies, protect stored footage, and report key stats. Officers would face limits on when they can view footage and on sharing recordings. Default retention would be 6 months (3 years if force or a complaint), and at least 90 days for in‑car video. These rules would apply only when officers are on duty.
New strings on DOJ policing grants
If enacted, DOJ grants would come with new conditions. Applicants would have to set aside at least 10% for anti‑profiling work, 5% for body‑camera policies, and 5% for accreditation help. Starting the first fiscal year that begins after 1 year from enactment, States and localities could lose Byrne or COPS funds if they lack chokehold/carotid‑hold bans, allow no‑knock drug warrants (for COPS), or fail to criminalize sexual acts under color of law with no consent defense. Jurisdictions could not pass funds to agencies with contracts that block DOJ consent‑decree enforcement or conflict with court orders. The Attorney General would issue guidance within 120 days and may steer discretionary grants to places that require accreditation. Covered programs include any funded by Byrne or COPS. Withheld funds could be released later, subject to a 5‑year cap.
Criminal ban on officer sexual acts
If enacted, it would be a federal crime for someone acting under color of law to engage in a sexual act with a person in federal custody. Consent would not be a defense. Penalties could include a fine and up to 15 years in prison. States and localities that get COPS grants would have to report each year on such cases and their outcomes, and federal watchdogs would report to Congress within 1 year and annually.
Easier civil-rights suits and prosecutions
If enacted, the bill would narrow qualified‑immunity defenses in civil‑rights suits. Officers could not avoid liability by claiming good faith, a belief their conduct was lawful, or that the right was not clearly established. It would also change federal criminal standards by replacing “willfully” with “knowingly or recklessly,” removing the death‑penalty option, and counting an act as causing death if it was a substantial factor.
Grants for community safety and hiring
If enacted, the bill would support community‑led safety work and officer hiring. Byrne and COPS grants could fund local task forces and crisis teams, with best‑practice reports. COPS could offer incentives to recruit and keep officers who live in or move to the communities they serve and would report on diversity and relocation impacts. The Attorney General could give $25 million in FY2026 to community groups for non‑police responses. Small tribal or local agencies could get technical help if they meet set conditions.
Limits on military gear to police
If enacted, the bill would tighten transfers of surplus military gear to local police. Agencies would need to describe the intended use, give at least 30 days of public notice online and in prominent places, and get approval from the local governing body. Recipients would have to return items they no longer need. The Department of Defense would send annual accounting reports to Congress.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Ivey
MD • D
Cosponsors
Adams
NC • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Ansari
AZ • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Balint
VT • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Beatty
OH • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Bell
MO • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Bera
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Beyer
VA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Brown
OH • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Brownley
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Carson
IN • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Carter (LA)
LA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Casten
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Castor (FL)
FL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Cherfilus-McCormick
FL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Chu
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Clarke (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Cleaver
MO • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Clyburn
SC • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Cohen
TN • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Correa
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Costa
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Crockett
TX • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Crow
CO • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Davis (IL)
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Dean (PA)
PA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
DelBene
WA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
DeGette
CO • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Deluzio
PA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
DeSaulnier
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Doggett
TX • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Escobar
TX • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Espaillat
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Evans (PA)
PA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Figures
AL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Fletcher
TX • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Foster
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Foushee
NC • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Friedman
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Frost
FL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Garamendi
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Garcia (CA)
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Garcia (IL)
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Garcia (TX)
TX • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Green, Al (TX)
TX • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Hayes
CT • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Houlahan
PA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Hoyer
MD • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Huffman
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Jackson (IL)
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Jacobs
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Jayapal
WA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Johnson (GA)
GA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Kamlager-Dove
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Kelly (IL)
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Khanna
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Krishnamoorthi
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Larsen (WA)
WA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Leger Fernandez
NM • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Lieu
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Lynch
MA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Matsui
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
McBath
GA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
McBride
DE • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
McClellan
VA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
McCollum
MN • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
McGarvey
KY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
McGovern
MA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
McIver
NJ • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Meeks
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Meng
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Mfume
MD • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Moore (WI)
WI • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Morelle
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Moulton
MA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Mrvan
IN • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Nadler
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Neguse
CO • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Ocasio-Cortez
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Olszewski
MD • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Omar
MN • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Panetta
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Pelosi
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Peters
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Pingree
ME • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Del. Plaskett, Stacey E. [D-VI-At Large]
VI • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Pocan
WI • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Pressley
MA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Ramirez
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Ross
NC • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Scanlon
PA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Schakowsky
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Schneider
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Scott, David
GA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Sewell
AL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Simon
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Sherman
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Smith (WA)
WA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Soto
FL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Stansbury
NM • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Stevens
MI • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Strickland
WA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Swalwell
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Thanedar
MI • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Thompson (MS)
MS • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Tlaib
MI • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Tokuda
HI • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Torres (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Trahan
MA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Underwood
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Vargas
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Veasey
TX • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Velazquez
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Wasserman Schultz
FL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Waters
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Watson Coleman
NJ • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Williams (GA)
GA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Wilson (FL)
FL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Tonko
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Johnson (TX)
TX • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Raskin
MD • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Randall
WA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Casar
TX • D
Sponsored 9/17/2025
Bishop
GA • D
Sponsored 9/19/2025
Larson (CT)
CT • D
Sponsored 10/10/2025
Gomez
CA • D
Sponsored 10/31/2025
Norcross
NJ • D
Sponsored 12/10/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR51 — Washington, D.C. Admission Act
Full statehood for Washington, Douglass Commonwealth would admit the District of Columbia as a new state on equal footing, while defining a smaller federal "Capital" and setting staged transitions for courts, property, and federal programs. - Capital residents would gain full congressional representation: two U.S. Senators and one U.S. Representative. The bill also requires states to allow "absent Capital" residents to vote by absentee ballot in federal elections. - The U.S. House would be permanently increased to 436 members and apportionment would be adjusted beginning with the first decennial census after admission. - The bill defines the federal Capital with a required 180-day survey, preserves federal court, prosecutorial, prison, parole, National Guard, and employee benefit arrangements on a temporary basis, and phases those responsibilities to the State as it certifies the necessary laws and personnel are in place.
HR1589 — American Dream and Promise Act of 2025
New pathways to permanent residence. This bill would create a ten‑year conditional permanent resident status for certain people who entered as children and would add an adjustment pathway for specified Temporary Protected Status and Deferred Enforced Departure holders. - Young long‑term residents and DACA‑eligible people could get a ten‑year conditional status if they meet rules like continuous presence since Jan 1, 2021 and education or credential benchmarks. They could convert to full permanent residence after meeting removal‑of‑condition rules and have limits on removal while applying. - Nationals with qualifying TPS or DED status who meet continuous‑presence rules could apply within a three‑year window and face a capped application fee of $1,140. - The bill creates a competitive grant program to help applicants, allows fee exemptions for youth, low‑income people, foster care alumni, and those with serious disabilities, and adds a $25 supplemental surcharge to fund appointed counsel.
HR15 — Equality Act
Adds sexual orientation and gender identity to the federal definition of sex and creates a uniform, nationwide nondiscrimination framework across employment, housing, credit, education, public accommodations, jury service, and programs that receive federal funds. The bill would harmonize definitions, remedies, and rules of construction across multiple civil rights statutes to make enforcement and claims more consistent. - Workers: Private and federal employees would gain explicit protection from discrimination for sexual orientation and gender identity. The bill would update Title VII rules, expand remedies, and adjust bona fide occupational qualification rules to account for gender identity. - People using public places, students, and tenants: Public accommodations and education laws would explicitly bar discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The Fair Housing Act would adopt the same definitions and protections to cover renters and buyers. - Borrowers, juries, and enforcement: The Equal Credit Opportunity Act would bar credit discrimination on these bases. Jury selection rules would be updated to prevent discrimination. The bill would also prevent the Religious Freedom Restoration Act from being used to challenge enforcement under the covered civil rights laws.
HR14 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore robust federal oversight of voting rights by rewriting Section 2 and creating a broad practice-based preclearance system. It sets new tests for vote-dilution and vote-denial claims, adds retrogression rules for actions on or after January 1, 2021, and requires extensive public notice, data disclosure, and observer powers. - Minority and language-minority voters: Provides clearer legal paths to challenge districting and practices that dilute or abridge votes, recognizes coalitions of minority groups, and applies retrogression rules to actions from January 1, 2021. - States and local election officials: Triggers preclearance using a 25-year lookback with numeric thresholds and creates an administrative bailout that requires demonstrating sustained compliance over a 10-year period to avoid coverage. - Enforcement, oversight, and courts: Expands who may sue to include private "aggrieved persons", centralizes observer authority in the Attorney General, and authorizes pre-suit inspection and information demands that courts may enforce or modify.
HR2763 — American Family Act
This bill creates monthly child tax credit payments that replace the annual Child Tax Credit mechanism and add a separate credit for other dependents. It sets fixed monthly amounts, a monthly advance payment system, rules for presumptive eligibility, and enforcement for improper claims. - Families and parents: Parents get monthly payments of $300 per child age 6 and older, higher monthly rates for younger children, and a $2,400 payment for a child in their birth month. - Other dependents and income: A new $500 nonrefundable credit for other dependents is added and phases out for higher earners, with thresholds that vary up to about $400,000 depending on filing status. - Administration and safeguards: The IRS will deliver monthly advance payments, use presumptive eligibility and a submission portal, require child and taxpayer TINs, permit limited data sharing with other government entities, and can disallow claims for fraud with penalties including a 120-month bar for fraud and a 24-month bar for reckless or intentional disregard.
HR17 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Strengthening pay equity by expanding who is protected and limiting employers from using past pay, the Paycheck Fairness Act would tighten how pay differences are justified and increase enforcement and data collection. - Workers and prospective employees would gain a ban on employer reliance on wage history and new nonretaliation protections for wage discussions. The bill lets a candidate voluntarily share prior pay only after a job offer and only to justify a higher wage. - Employers would face new civil penalties for wage-history violations starting at $5,000 for a first offense and rising by $1,000 per subsequent offense to a $10,000 cap. Affected workers could recover damages up to $10,000 plus attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief where appropriate. - Federal enforcement and oversight would increase. The EEOC and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would enforce the rules. The bill would create a National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force and require expanded pay-data collection by EEOC, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and OFCCP from federal contractors. Provisions would take effect six months after enactment.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in